@MJ12 Commando - I suspect the gap is that there are too many options. The response to Gretkov is a fully open "you are present, you can do whatever your Spheres allow, what do you do" vote - and that leads to decision paralysis. JaniceQuest has boiled down to two options, and minor variants on them.
-- or to put it another way, I have no idea how to solve Gretkov beyond a general "it'd be kind of cool to just lock him up on the spot, is that a thing we can actually do? Wish we had something like, Life 3/DSci 3 'Ward to particular body'." But I do know that I much prefer Ethos to Pathos, here.
-- Speaking of which. @Aleph - The thing is... I'm not sure how to put my thoughts into words here. I feel like Pathos is too... the closest word is general, I think. Sure, the path we took to get this far was absolutely personal to Roth, it required engaging him as a character - but at the end of Pathos is a new path that really doesn't. The steps we take after we break him under the load aren't specific to Roth, they generalize to to any sufficiently broken person who's lost all direction.
-- In other words, it removes his character from the equation and leaves him with no narrative agency. And I feel like that that literally never happening is a major theme of PQ. That you can be killed, or tortured, or fall three Enlightenment stages and lose half your memories, or turned into an evil space ghost, or just about anything else - but the decisions of Mages always matter. Even if it's just "I choose to die, would you kindly kill me."
Pathos, as written, generalizes too well. I'm wary of it.
(And also. Half of what Janice is arguing about, is that Roth is a Hard Man who makes Hard Decisions, is too willing to make the allegedly necessary sacrifice. You can make the case that one of the conflicts here, other than uneasy peace versus easy war, is precisely Gold vs. Bronze.)
-- or to put it another way, I have no idea how to solve Gretkov beyond a general "it'd be kind of cool to just lock him up on the spot, is that a thing we can actually do? Wish we had something like, Life 3/DSci 3 'Ward to particular body'." But I do know that I much prefer Ethos to Pathos, here.
-- Speaking of which. @Aleph - The thing is... I'm not sure how to put my thoughts into words here. I feel like Pathos is too... the closest word is general, I think. Sure, the path we took to get this far was absolutely personal to Roth, it required engaging him as a character - but at the end of Pathos is a new path that really doesn't. The steps we take after we break him under the load aren't specific to Roth, they generalize to to any sufficiently broken person who's lost all direction.
-- In other words, it removes his character from the equation and leaves him with no narrative agency. And I feel like that that literally never happening is a major theme of PQ. That you can be killed, or tortured, or fall three Enlightenment stages and lose half your memories, or turned into an evil space ghost, or just about anything else - but the decisions of Mages always matter. Even if it's just "I choose to die, would you kindly kill me."
Pathos, as written, generalizes too well. I'm wary of it.
(And also. Half of what Janice is arguing about, is that Roth is a Hard Man who makes Hard Decisions, is too willing to make the allegedly necessary sacrifice. You can make the case that one of the conflicts here, other than uneasy peace versus easy war, is precisely Gold vs. Bronze.)