But as the Technocratic Perspective shows, Consensus also makes the Traditions criminally negligent, because you're making things worse for everyone else by allowing for the idea of man-eating monsters in exchange for the ability to set things on fire with just your mind.
Well that's the thing- from the trad-perspective, those monsters either aren't man-eating at all, or there are other just as valid protections against them.
In the Old World, all it took was some Aramanth and Clove put in a cloth bag and work around your neck, and you had a potent ward against all manner of night folk- just as strong as forcefields and primium. In many ways, from the trad perspective, the old world was
better, because those defenses were far more reliable than forcefields and primium because they
always worked. They didn't run out of battery power, or suffer from scarcity- any grandmother could put them together. She didn't need to be a mage either, it was just an intrinsic power of those plants.
Now, that's all changed. There's still night folk preying on humans on the street, but they can't operate as openly, and while the old measures aren't nearly as strong/now require mages, the proliferation of the technocracy's paradigm means that those enemies of humanity have all these extra tools to use against you, and you're reliant on a human run cabal that is totally victim to funding shortages and politics and personal ideologies to defend you and yours.
Is it any wonder that the grandmother who grew up with stories about the capricious faerie folk and how to ward them off wishes for the days when a a few sprigs of John's Wort was sufficient, while now the faeries are armed with AK-47's and Semtex when they come to steal your children and the defenses that used to work do nothing unless you're a mage/linear sorceror.
The worst part from a trad perspective is, the change in paradigm
only affects mages. It doesn't affect any of the night folk- except changelings but that's because they're 'special'- and all the hostile beings that the technocracy claims it wants to protect the world from... are still out there, in the shadows.
Both sides are right, and both sides are wrong, in similar and entirely different ways. That's really what Consensus means- there is no single objective truth. Even fundamental elements that traditionally transcend consensus- like gravity or life 2 (the human body functions), may be changeable. There's no perfect path to ascension just waiting to be discovered- oh no. You've gotta work for your happy endings.