- Pronouns
- They/Them
But yeah, remind me in the morning and I'll write it up.
"Be kind to the creature that guards your door. Do not mock its broken, bleeding face.Don't mind TenFolds, he's just grumpy because the latest cactus is spinier than he expected.
This is what Omicron is thinking of.
Edit: But seriously whenever I read stuff like this I'm like "Ohhh, Ahhh, wondrous. Dangerous. How do we control this or kill it?"
Reminds me of one of my reactions upon I finished reading the Promethean books.
"These guys could be the perfect soldier if minor changes were made to their psyches and bodies. What would an enterprising Mage/Cheiron directive do?"
Wait, why would that evolve in the first place? I don't even mean the right angle stuff, I mean – hunting humans is a ridiculous niche to have, and functionally impossible unless you're prepared to engage in the kind of pack tactics that primitive psychopathy largely precludes. It's easier and more energy-efficient to hunt pretty much anything else, why would they even become a subspecies?Specifically they're an extinct prehistoric human subspecies adapted for hunting other human subspecies. They're clinical psychopaths with extremely acute intellect but the way their brain is wired to get that intellectual acuity makes them go into seizures when they see right angles. As a result they died out when humanity started building architecture and they couldn't approach human settlements anymore.
"This work of science fiction whose narrative revolves around fictional science contains nonsensical fictional science" is legitimate criticism which with sufficient severity constitutes a reason to reject the work.
Wait, why would that evolve in the first place? I don't even mean the right angle stuff, I mean – hunting humans is a ridiculous niche to have, and functionally impossible unless you're prepared to engage in the kind of pack tactics that primitive psychopathy largely precludes. It's easier and more energy-efficient to hunt pretty much anything else, why would they even become a subspecies?
No, Blindsight vampires explicitly need to eat people. They trapped themselves in a narrow ecological niche because Humans have an enzyme that helped the development of their savant-like skills, and in turn increased intellect made them incrementally better hunters , so they locked themselves in a loop of needing to eat humans to better eat humans. When their favored prey became unavailable they died out.Blindsight vampires are not specifically human predators - and aren't specifically blood-drinkers, either. "Vampire" is really a misnomer. They're really more like a subspecies of movie super-smart serial killers. Like, their baseline is that they're Hannibal Lector or Jigsaw.
Basically, the thought exercise with them is "what if consciousness is a handicap because it means you're wasting brain cycles on things like self-doubt and the like". You don't have to agree with it, but the axiom that Blindsight runs with is "human intelligence is a mess of kludged together compromises and repurposing of existing systems, so we can't assume that everything humans think is important for intelligence is actually necessary for intelligence". And so Blindsight (which refers to the phenomenon of blindsight, where people with certain kinds of brain injury which means they can't consciously see despite having working eyes will still react to external stimuli despite insisting they don't see a thing) works with the idea that... okay, what if a human subspecies in pre-history evolved a slightly different way of thinking so they were smarter than us, but didn't have something we think is vital for being a person.
Remember, Blindsight is a hard-sci-fi horror novel.
(And real life blindsight is super-creepy. Someone who's sure they can't see anything, who swears blind that they're blind, can be coaxed to walk down a hallway littered with obstacles and traps and they'll dodge them and evade them while insisting they're walking in a straight line. You can sit them in front of a TV, have the TV display someone who looks like they're going to punch them, and they'll flinch. Their consciousness isn't in full control of their body.)
didn't you make a sheet for kaneki once?Wait, why would that evolve in the first place? I don't even mean the right angle stuff, I mean – hunting humans is a ridiculous niche to have, and functionally impossible unless you're prepared to engage in the kind of pack tactics that primitive psychopathy largely precludes. It's easier and more energy-efficient to hunt pretty much anything else, why would they even become a subspecies?
Yes, I once wrote a character sheet for a magic ghost warrior patterned off a surgically-created cannibal mutant.
Reminds me of people with split brain. The two halves of your brain can have startlingly different responses to stimuli when they stop talking to each other. One guy had to fight off one of his own arms attempts to strangle his wife because his right hemisphere decided that aggression was the best way to deal with her upsetting him.
"The fuck is this shit even, is it a bird or a mammal or what the fuck"
Actually I was talking about the fact that other scientists immediately accused the person who brought back the dead platypus of playing hoax on them by sewing together a fake implausible animal."The fuck is this shit even, is it a bird or a mammal or what the fuck"
Meh, many real-world evolutionary oddities look implausible. We just can't say "this is bad fiction!" because we can see them in real life. If they didn't exist IRL but were found in fiction, people would complain about them being implausible. Recall what happened with the first report of a platypus?
Well, Echopraxia hints that the whole 'ultra-territorial solitary' thing is not how things really were back in the old days, contrary to what the claims that are spread through the public. I also personally have a suspicion that the combination of (a) all of vampire genome being present-but-dormant in modern humans and (b) vampire ability to superhumanly manipulate humans are somehow related to the vampires' reproductive strategies.Platypuses are quite functional in their native environment. Their evolutionary adaptations are bizarre, but functional.
The same is the case with parasitism.
The evolutionary nice of a solitary human who eats other humans is a pretty massive dead end, though. Even ignoring the right angle thing, serial killers aren't exactly known to be reproductively prolific.
And the thing about natural selection is that it doesn't favor ability or strength or skill or speed or ruthlessness. It favors banging. In the evolution, the ability to win a fight doesn't really matter much unless it's a fight over a member of the opposite sex with nice looking parts. Evolution favors those who have mastered the steps of the horizontal tango, the sluts and the whores, the bimbos and the himbos.
An ultra-creepy cannibal sociopath is an evolutionary dead end because no one is going to fuck him or her. It's rather that simple.
A subspecies semen vampire who can't live without human sperm would be more plausible.
No, Blindsight vampires explicitly need to eat people. They trapped themselves in a narrow ecological niche because Humans have an enzyme that helped the development of their savant-like skills, and in turn increased intellect made them incrementally better hunters , so they locked themselves in a loop of needing to eat humans to better eat humans. When their favored prey became unavailable they died out.
Peter Watts said:Homo sapiens vampiris was a short-lived Human subspecies which diverged from the ancestral line between 800,000 and 500,000 year BP. More gracile than either neandertal or sapiens, gross physical divergence from sapiens included slight elongation of canines, mandibles, and long bones in service of an increasingly predatory lifestyle. Due to the relatively brief lifespan of this lineage, these changes were not extensive and overlapped considerably with conspecific allometries; differences become diagnostically significant only at large sample sizes (N>130)
However, while virtually identical to modern humans in terms of gross physical morphology, vampiris was radically divergent from sapiens on the biochemical, neurological, and soft-tissue levels. The GI tract was foreshortened and secreted a distinct range of enzymes more suited to a carnivorous diet. Since cannibalism carries with it a high risk of prionic infection2, the vampire immune system displayed great resistance to prion diseases3, as well as to a variety of helminth and anasakid parasites. Vampiris hearing and vision were superior to that of sapiens; vampire retinas were quadrochromatic (containing four types of cones, compared to only three among baseline humans); the fourth cone type, common to nocturnal predators ranging from cats to snakes, was tuned to near-infrared. Vampire grey matter was "underconnected" compared to Human norms due to a relative lack of interstitial white matter; this forced isolated cortical modules to become self-contained and hypereffective, leading to omnisavantic pattern-matching and analytical skills4.
Virtually all of these adaptations are cascade effects that— while resulting from a variety of proximate causes— can ultimately be traced back to a paracentric inversion mutation on the Xq21.3 block of the X-chromosome5. This resulted in functional changes to genes coding for protocadherins (proteins that play a critical role in brain and central nervous system development). While this provoked radical neurological and behavioral changes, significant physical changes were limited to soft tissue and microstructures that do not fossilise. This, coupled with extremely low numbers of vampire even at peak population levels (existing as they did at the tip of the trophic pyramid) explains their virtual absence from the fossil record.
Significant deleterious effects also resulted from this cascade. For example, vampires lost the ability to code for -Protocadherin Y, whose genes are found exclusively on the hominid Y chromosome6. Unable to synthesise this vital protein themselves, vampires had to obtain it from their food. Human prey thus comprised an essential component of their diet, but a relatively slow-breeding one (a unique situation, since prey usually outproduce their predators by at least an order of magnitude). Normally this dynamic would be utterly unsustainable: vampires would predate humans to extinction, and then die off themselves for lack of essential nutrients.
Extended periods of lungfish-like dormancy7 (the so-called "undead" state)—and the consequent drastic reduction in vampire energetic needs— developed as a means of redressing this imbalance. To this end vampires produced elevated levels of endogenous Ala-(D) Leuenkephalin (a mammalian hibernation-inducing peptide8) and dobutamine, which strengthens the heart muscle during periods on inactivity9.
Peter Watts said:Yeah, the protocadherin thing is spelled out in the endnotes, but I should have looked at it a lot more critically. I was desperately looking for some reason why vampires needed to feed on humans, why they couldn't just as easily prey on warthogs or wildebeests (which would have kept them from going extinct after we baselines stumbled on the use of crosses as an antipredator defense). I needed some vital nutrient or compound that could only be found in human prey, and I was so giddy with relief to find that protocadherin paper (hey, it even affected brain development!) that I didn't look as closely at it as I should have. It was only after the book was out that someone said "Wait a minute, that gene's on the Y chromosome — so do human females have stunted nervous systems, or what?"