First in game post is a warning that they are physically ill, this isn't a thing that should be held against anyone, though it should be kept in mind and as time goes on if participation doesn't increase in future days it does become a point of interest. As each day generates something to be analyzed.
Ah, the joys of being distracted during a hammer game. By the time you check what's going on you can't vote because it would get things too close. Honestly both sides have me facepalming, but really Day one Lynches tend to be a mess like that. At least there's no actual claims yet.
Observation/check-in post, I like them as it at least shows you're paying attention, however having to many is always a concern if they are not eventually joined with stances and analysis. I did press him to take a side as this observation didn't.
Honestly probably TPK, though Nani is somewhat suspicious too.
States a side but worded in a on the fence sort of the way giving credence to both sides which isn't inherently bad both sides had and still had points on the matter. Its a safe response.
[X] Lynch TPK
Because frankly it's getting obnoxious, and I remember the games where we used role card info as verification. It gets tiresome fast, and either wrecks the setup or fails to give good results. There's little reason to think the scum don't know the name of the (lowercase) town. I mean it's two people being stubborn at one another but I'm willing to give Nani benefit of the doubt.
Also because this honestly looks to me like a slightly different scum ploy than the one he pulled last game. Instead of actively clamping down on info he grandstands about a minor detail in a way that creates an impression he's Town because he knows a random factoid that doesn't actually have reason for scum not to know it.
Change of tune to an extent now a "major" stance has been made with a vote 5 onto TPK, a vote that seems to move to Nanimani not being lynched as nanimani had just reached vote 6 while TPK dropped down to vote 4 due to Shadow Shinobi's vote swap. Does add reasoning to the action that is somewhat new though to be fair very few reasons could be expressed that weren't already in day 1.
[X] Unvote TPK
Not entirely sure about Masked, but can understand wanting the others disarmed just in case.
Jumps off TPK and a statement distancing himself from TMR's lynch, not joining it, which honestly makes me believe they are not a teammate of TMR. However with TMR appearing most likely 3rd party that isn't really a telling analysis.
Honestly seems a bit wonky to have Town start outnumbered by thirds. As is by your count we'd already have an equal number of Townies and thirds. Perhaps 2 of each faction except you? Still bad but would mean we're not having Ritual levels of everyone for themselves. Regardless, assuming what you say is true, Town is in a pretty awkward spot.
Observational post though with some light analysis, worded in such a way that is does believe the Winged Cat claim just not in its entirety.
Could be rolecop Maf who hit lucky and found a Hunter. See a wizard, see a Hunter, assume they're made for one another, get easy gratitude and separation from Town by giving out slightly doctored info. Maybe keep the Hunter in mind for if they start to reach majority, or need a scapegoat.
Admittedly that's complete paranoia on how the info could be technically correct but be obtained by different means. Happy to believe him for now, agree it seems too complex to be made up.
Theorycrafting, nothing inherently wrong with that, though as a general statement I disagree with the thought that complex claims are unlikely to be false. This idea actually makes complex claims more powerful as if you can justify something that sounds weird you can make people believe it, this works both as town and non-town as I made up a complicated role in TPK's game as town where I could convert people that claimed third party into good guys during the day if they said a phrase I made up then added a bit more where they would die if they attempted to kill in the night after making the oath. It didn't seem to convince the townies all that much but it did freak out and put both scum factions on their toes. So complexity does not denote honesty.
Just been a bit distracted and don't really have anything to add today. Will try to go over stuff and see if there's anything I'm missing later, but kinda ambivalent on Lynch targets today and the only other major thing to comment on is Winged Cat's explaination of the setup, which I've already done. Stuck in lurk mode right now.
Oh hi, I'm sure you have something to add why not do a quick list of your thoughts on all the players if nothing else?
Also some paranoia driven theorycrafting as I never trust anyone fully. I do not think the following is the case ->
What if scum decided not to kill and had nanimani claim being healed to try and pull the doctor into revealing? If the doctor reveals yes they likely lose a member but they get the doctor killed that night, if the doctor doesn't reveal they instill nanimani into our thoughts and minds as town for being attacked but healed and thus not mafia. If they kill the doctor the next night their ruse becomes very stable and unlikely to be disproved.
Once again I don't believe that scenario occured but it was an interesting thought experiment. Reasoning on why I don't believe that is the case is ->
Killing Nanimani makes sense last night if you kill and reveal Nanimani as town (who has claimed a power role so scum know they are removing some form of power role unless Nanimani was bluffing) you throw additional shade onto what was team lynch Nanimani and may be able to get a lynch off on that selection of players having a bit of the policy lynch flavor return in force, this also would give benefit to the defenses of those on team Lynch TPK as that team would've been defending a now confirmed townie. Basically I'm saying good job doctor.