Warhammer 40k General thread

My personal prefered take is that spacemarines can recuit male or female assperants, but that the process of become an Astartes "turns" them all into male "battlebrothers". I like this because I think it keeps the feel of the all male force (warrior monks) that I like, but allows for some solving of the recruitment poal arguement. It also means that those who want to do homebrew chapters that are female can just say that the effects of the process are different because of a gene-seed quirk or whatever.

That said I really find people's insistance of female marines are bit strange, and think the current status quo works. I can't help but feel that in some cases the motivation is down to culture war point scoring rather any regard for the setting. Maybe I am wrong though and there are good reasons.

I get it, SM are easy to paint and are your best sellers, but come on GW.

I do play SM as my main army, (and like centurions!), and particularly with the new Primarius there are some gaps in the range, but I would want GW to give other factions some more love, which tbf they seem to be doing.
 
To me, the question of female marines is "what's the hook?" Narratively it serves the Imperium far better to not allow women into its ultra-machismo, apex-fascist-police-state policing, warrior-monk religious orders. Space Marines aren't bystanders, they're THE biggest and more archetypal enforcer of the Imperium's vision especially as it comes to xenos, mutants and heretics. They're hulking brutes, on the surface level they seem barely men but on a more primal level they're the most men. The only thing they know how to do and the only thing they even understand to be possible is to enforce dominance via terrible, omnidirectional violence. They're the personification of the death cult.

'Allowing' women into this paradigm is the decision of a capitalist who wants to acquire more players for a faction which like, okay some people are upfront about this being their motivation. Still, I kind of just don't even remotely care about that logic? There's more to art than whether it is dementedly inclusive to the most people at once. The way to include more and new people into 40k is not by making the Imperium welcoming, because the Imperium should not be understood to be welcoming ever. If the Imperium is to be made 'welcoming' then it should only ever be in the sense that it has suborned gender, race, class, etc. unto itself. You aren't a female space marine because 'females' don't exist. You won't be wearing gendered clothing or wading into battle in pride colours. You are a Space Marine. You are His Angel of Death. You exist to stoically slaughter defiant populations of oppressed peoples. Your psycho-stimulant drugs and mandatory daily hours of brain conditioning remove all social thought from you completely. You are no longer a person having become a self-perpetuating tool of the system. You exist only to deal violence to those who, in another life, would have been your fiercest allies but can now only see as the subhuman other.

It does not even occur to you to mourn what you have lost. You do not feel for you will Know No Fear.

Congratulations, you are now represented.

Raising this question is like raising the question of where all the black Ku Klux Klan members are. If you're asking it then there's something you're not understanding.

If your response to all that baggage is "don't care want girl marine" then again, okay but why should I care that you don't care? I care. I care that 40k is ugly and want it to say that way. I want 40k to continue to be weird and offputting for the same reason that I want Everything Everywhere All At Once to continue to be weird and offputting. The progressive power of diversity doesn't come from making everyone into an equally straight white male in the current system. It comes from the melding and acknowledgement and retention of differences to create a new system that is not broken in the first place. Go read other sci-fi. Go play other wargames. 40k can crash and burn economically and it would be more authentic that way than introducing female marines. It's good for things to end, if that is the straw that breaks the camel's back then so be it. In fifty or a hundred years you can dredge it back up as Warhammer 40,000 and Female Space Marines (ala Pride and Prejudice and Zombies) if it still matters to you then, but I'm willing to bet that it won't.

It's not a problem that 40k is about bad people doing bad things to each other and I'm tired of pretending that it is. I'm tired of the cult of the mainstream that demands everything be for everybody.
 
All or mostly male: Space Marines, CSM (unless you count Heretics), Orks
All or mostly female: Sisters of Battle
Both in a mix: Aeldari, Imperial Guard, Custodes (Sisters of Silence), Tau, Genestealer Cults (maybe? I haven't taken a close look at their models)
Indeterminate/unclear: Tyranids, Mechanicus, Necrons, Demons, Knights
Orks are technically genderless asexual fungi so they are not actually "male"
That said I really find people's insistance of female marines are bit strange, and think the current status quo works. I can't help but feel that in some cases the motivation is down to culture war point scoring rather any regard for the setting. Maybe I am wrong though and there are good reasons.
it is peak liberalism "isn't it a good thing half of all weapon manufacturers are lead by women" parody. women can be xenophobic imperial dogs too!!/s
 
I'm tired of the cult of the mainstream that demands everything be for everybody.

Could you point me to where this cult is and how diversifying the roster makes any of these factions less atrocious? From where I'm sitting finding more ways to fit more people into the meat-grinder instead of less...feels well more 40k?

Like say I don't think the setting is enahanced in terms of grimarkness by the soft retcon of things like Necron Pariahs because now you have fewer ways for the necrons to be horrible. If genestealer cults were made more diverse with say a way of actually effectively preying on Orkoids, that wouldn't make the setting a nicer place to live in just by being more diverse. @_@

This isn't even me disagreeing with the stance that loyalist space marines should all be male. I can sort of sort of see it for CSM due to thousands of years of warp fuckery...but as for the meta-narrative hear more broadly I don't get it.

Perhaps I am misunderstanding the argument?
 
I feel like Orkoids could have females by having it being unlocked via some krork lite/like phenomenon and or /tyranid interactions like those that were once attributed to the creation of squigs.

It could be a measure to increase genetic variation in case something was otherwise hindering them like IDK having to run on the same genetic scrap for who knows how many millions of years at this point?

Modelwise just bring back really big mouthed/ long jawed orks and claim they are mouth brooders when reproducing sexually, boom done.
No?
 
If Warhammer cannot survive as a product without chuds, then it deserves to die.

Considering your definition of 'chud' seems to be 'wouldn't like femarines'? *eyeroll* Good luck with that.

Raising this question is like raising the question of where all the black Ku Klux Klan members are. If you're asking it then there's something you're not understanding.

Unrelated to anything but... Ron Stallworth. Also kinda Daryl Davis, though he never actually 'joined' so much as 'played music and talked with some of them'. The latter converted a few people away from the Klan.

To me, the question of female marines is "what's the hook?" Narratively it serves the Imperium far better to not allow women into its ultra-machismo, apex-fascist-police-state policing, warrior-monk religious orders. Space Marines aren't bystanders, they're THE biggest and more archetypal enforcer of the Imperium's vision especially as it comes to xenos, mutants and heretics. They're hulking brutes, on the surface level they seem barely men but on a more primal level they're the most men. The only thing they know how to do and the only thing they even understand to be possible is to enforce dominance via terrible, omnidirectional violence. They're the personification of the death cult.

'Allowing' women into this paradigm is the decision of a capitalist who wants to acquire more players for a faction which like, okay some people are upfront about this being their motivation. Still, I kind of just don't even remotely care about that logic? There's more to art than whether it is dementedly inclusive to the most people at once. The way to include more and new people into 40k is not by making the Imperium welcoming, because the Imperium should not be understood to be welcoming ever. If the Imperium is to be made 'welcoming' then it should only ever be in the sense that it has suborned gender, race, class, etc. unto itself. You aren't a female space marine because 'females' don't exist. You won't be wearing gendered clothing or wading into battle in pride colours. You are a Space Marine. You are His Angel of Death. You exist to stoically slaughter defiant populations of oppressed peoples. Your psycho-stimulant drugs and mandatory daily hours of brain conditioning remove all social thought from you completely. You are no longer a person having become a self-perpetuating tool of the system. You exist only to deal violence to those who, in another life, would have been your fiercest allies but can now only see as the subhuman other.

It does not even occur to you to mourn what you have lost. You do not feel for you will Know No Fear.

Congratulations, you are now represented.

If your response to all that baggage is "don't care want girl marine" then again, okay but why should I care that you don't care? I care. I care that 40k is ugly and want it to say that way. I want 40k to continue to be weird and offputting for the same reason that I want Everything Everywhere All At Once to continue to be weird and offputting. The progressive power of diversity doesn't come from making everyone into an equally straight white male in the current system. It comes from the melding and acknowledgement and retention of differences to create a new system that is not broken in the first place. Go read other sci-fi. Go play other wargames. 40k can crash and burn economically and it would be more authentic that way than introducing female marines. It's good for things to end, if that is the straw that breaks the camel's back then so be it. In fifty or a hundred years you can dredge it back up as Warhammer 40,000 and Female Space Marines (ala Pride and Prejudice and Zombies) if it still matters to you then, but I'm willing to bet that it won't.

It's not a problem that 40k is about bad people doing bad things to each other and I'm tired of pretending that it is. I'm tired of the cult of the mainstream that demands everything be for everybody.
Mostly agreed.

I don't think there's a problem with having an all-male faction in the first place, any more than having an all-female faction like the SoB (though the fact that the Sisters have male priest models is somewhat annoying). It's fiction, do what you want.

When creating a space marine, you essentially use a human being as a base to create a miniature clone of a primarch. Femarines would not be any different from the male marines in any meaningful way. Vulkan's geneseed would still turn you black and give you glowing red eyes. Corvus Corax's geneseed would still give you albinism. etc. Which means the model wouldn't be different, which means you'd have token diversity at best.

I also feel that just adding female space marines doesn't fix any of the *actual* problems 40k has as a game line. Namely: the minis are too expensive, there's not enough focus on non-marine factions (especially non-imperial), lore decisions are being made based on what sells (oh hello Custodians and/or Knights I didn't see you there) or are being ignored (look at the product line and tell me you know the Imperium's been split in half by the great rift)...

And I said this earlier, but if we really want women to get more invested in 40k, and we really think the best way to do that is to create more female models, can we give them something other than the mens' table scraps?

Orks are technically genderless asexual fungi so they are not actually "male"

While this is technically true, I feel it's a little silly to argue that the faction of big green masculine warriors that all use 'he' pronouns and are referred to as 'da boyz' aren't a all/mostly male faction. It feels unfair to the 'we have too many all-male factions' argument to grab what is only technically correct. It's also why the tyranids are in 'indeterminate' despite being eusocial insects (and thus probably mostly infertile females).

Could you point me to where this cult is and how diversifying the roster makes any of these factions less atrocious?

Dude where have you been the last 20 years?

From where I'm sitting finding more ways to fit more people into the meat-grinder instead of less...feels well more 40k?

Like say I don't think the setting is enahanced in terms of grimarkness by the soft retcon of things like Necron Pariahs because now you have fewer ways for the necrons to be horrible. If genestealer cults were made more diverse with say a way of actually effectively preying on Orkoids, that wouldn't make the setting a nicer place to live in just by being more diverse. @_@

This isn't even me disagreeing with the stance that loyalist space marines should all be male. I can sort of sort of see it for CSM due to thousands of years of warp fuckery...but as for the meta-narrative hear more broadly I don't get it.

Perhaps I am misunderstanding the argument?

Space Marines are not something you can just "throw into the meat grinder" like guardsmen (hence why more female guardsmen would actually work). They're too difficult to create.

One of the arguments given for why we need femarines is to introduce more diversity to the product line to draw in a wider audience (i fucking hate that term so much) but in this case doing so comes at the cost of one of the things that Delirium feels makes the Space Marines grimdark: their nature as an exclusionary faction. I could be wrong but that seems to be what he's going for.

Pariahs aren't a thing because they don't fit into the new Necron paradigm, it has nothing to do with how horrible they are or they would've gotten rid of the Flayed Ones. The Daemonculabra is an example of a thing that isn't referenced because the writers realized they went too far into the grimderp side.

I feel like Orkoids could have females by having it being unlocked via some krork lite/like phenomenon and or /tyranid interactions like those that were once attributed to the creation of squigs.

It could be a measure to increase genetic variation in case something was otherwise hindering them like IDK having to run on the same genetic scrap for who knows how many millions of years at this point?

Modelwise just bring back really big mouthed/ long jawed orks and claim they are mouth brooders when reproducing sexually, boom done.
No?
There used to be female orks, apparently. Sometimes a Boy would get a weird feelin' and go off to 'find somefin'
 
Last edited:
Dude where have you been the last 20 years?



Space Marines are not something you can just "throw into the meat grinder" like guardsmen (hence why more female guardsmen would actually work). They're too difficult to create.



Pariahs aren't a thing because they don't fit into the new Necron paradigm, it has nothing to do with how horrible they are or they would've gotten rid of the Flayed Ones. The Daemonculabra is an example of a thing that isn't referenced because the writers realized they went too far into the grimderp side.

Assume I've been under some rock on mars if it helps you out. The meatgrinder *is* the creation of marines given how many children get ground into (sometimes literal) mush from the Imperium trying and most of the time failing to build them.

I don't get how it (pariahs existing as a phenomenon within any of necrondom) falls outside the new paradigm, what exactly was newly introduced to the necrons that would inculcate against using meatbags that way? Genuinely being serious, legitimately out of touch on this stuff I think.
 
Assume I've been under some rock on mars if it helps you out. The meatgrinder *is* the creation of marines given how many children get ground into (sometimes literal) mush from the Imperium trying and most of the time failing to build them.

Now you have the exact opposite problem.

"Isn't it great that women get ground down into mushy giblets during the recruitment process too?"

I don't get how it (pariahs existing as a phenomenon within any of necrondom) falls outside the new paradigm, what exactly was newly introduced to the necrons that would inculcate against using meatbags that way? Genuinely being serious, legitimately out of touch on this stuff I think.

Necron Pariahs were essentially human blanks taken by the necrons and turned into new anti-psyker soldiers for their force. Occasionally Pariahs maintained enough of their former selves to speak with their enemies, giving them a bit of character (see Dawn of War Dark Crusade). It's also implied that the existence of blanks in the human species was due to genetic manipulation by the Necrons millennia ago for this exact purpose.

Necrons now have characters with names and personalities, so they don't need someone speakign for them. They have a construction material called Blackstone that suppresses the warp, so they don't need an anti-psyker weapon. And the ability to bring in other species doesn't really fit with their aesthetic as an ancient race of robot skeletons returning to reclaim their old empire from lesser beings. Their combat niche is now filled by Lychguard, iirc (wasn't much of a tabletop player when they were still around)

It's not a decision I agree with. In lore, they were an experimental weapon that didn't work as well as the necrons wanted and were abandoned. Which is kind of disappointing imo, I like pariahs.
 
Could you point me to where this cult is and how diversifying the roster makes any of these factions less atrocious? From where I'm sitting finding more ways to fit more people into the meat-grinder instead of less...feels well more 40k?

Like say I don't think the setting is enahanced in terms of grimarkness by the soft retcon of things like Necron Pariahs because now you have fewer ways for the necrons to be horrible. If genestealer cults were made more diverse with say a way of actually effectively preying on Orkoids, that wouldn't make the setting a nicer place to live in just by being more diverse. @_@

This isn't even me disagreeing with the stance that loyalist space marines should all be male. I can sort of sort of see it for CSM due to thousands of years of warp fuckery...but as for the meta-narrative hear more broadly I don't get it.

Perhaps I am misunderstanding the argument?

It makes them less atrocious in a very surface-level way but that's also why it's insidious. If you know the meta backstory to the issue then the question of the Imperium using more people as Space Marine fodder is understood in that context but if you don't, say if your first introduction to 40k is in 2025, then the Imperium is having the edges increasingly sanded off and that's the context you understand it in. We complain a lot about the Imperium being painted as the good guys but stuff like this is exactly what tricks people who aren't paying attention into seeing it that way. "The Imperium is just doing what's necessary, look there's nothing unfair about it see, they even pick from both sexes for Space Marines." Guilliman's return and reformation of certain aspects of the Imperium play into this in a big way. I think the way the fandom adores the Ultramarines as the 'good guy' Space Marines is genuinely concerning because they're not less cruel, they're just more efficient in their cruelty. The more of these kinds of changes that happen the harder and harder it becomes to intuit that the Imperium is meant to be a critique of the fascist state and the more people will agree that the Imperium is broadly correct.

The reality is that 'I'm an equal opportunity abuser' is pretty much never actually true. You've probably even seen the old meme of racists trying to defend themselves by saying they hate everyone equally or something. It's just not true. They don't hate everyone equally, they might be misanthropic but it's very clear there's a special reservoir of extra hatred for certain people. The Imperium is deeply fascist and part of that is an inherent obsession with masculinity. Many people will say that Space Marines are a juvenile male power fantasy and that's absolutely right, it's exactly what they are.

They were designed this way, they're a product of a mixture of both uncritically accepting certain ideas but also of purposely setting out to make an institution that was violently macho. It's not a boys club by accident, it's a boy club because of course it's a boys club, why would men let women into it? The mission statement of creating a Space Marine is to make the biggest toughest, big mclargehuge guy possible. It's representative both of real-world misogyny and Imperial misogyny that they've convinced themselves by the power of tradition, ego and pseudo-science that this is a necessary division. You can gene-enhance an afab person in 40k but the specific institution of 'the Space Marines' is by boys for boys and that says something that it wouldn't say if you changed it.

The thing is also that despite feeling strongly about this I want to try to be clear that what I care about isn't whether female space marines can exist but the idea that 40k needs to change specifically to pursue market dominance or satisfy customers that aren't me personally currently interested. I understand it exists to make money and Games Workshop will make a - largely financial - decision about this over which I have no control, and if they say female marines can be a thing then they can be. It won't impact my enjoyment of 40k overly much except that I'll have fun making girl berserkers. The decision itself doesn't matter here but the financial-incentive-driven logic piques my concern. It has the effect of making things blander in the name of chasing growth. The number doesn't always have to go up is basically the point.

GW should continue to chase out grognards and Nazis (firstly just because it's the correct thing to do, but also that group has its own terrible ideas for the direction 40k ought to go in) but it should do that by ceasing to focus on the Imperium in the way that it does and highlighting how shitty it is in comparison to other factions and the real world, not by sanding off its edges and telling you that actually the Imperium believes in girlbossing and Marneus Calgar says trans rights. I vastly prefer using something in the vein of the Leagues of Votann to explore this space than the Imperium.
 
The reality is that 'I'm an equal opportunity abuser' is pretty much never actually true. You've probably even seen the old meme of racists trying to defend themselves by saying they hate everyone equally or something. It's just not true. They don't hate everyone equally, they might be misanthropic but it's very clear there's a special reservoir of extra hatred for certain people. The Imperium is deeply fascist and part of that is an inherent obsession with masculinity. Many people will say that Space Marines are a juvenile male power fantasy and that's absolutely right, it's exactly what they are.

GW should continue to chase out grognards and Nazis (firstly just because it's the correct thing to do, but also that group has its own terrible ideas for the direction 40k ought to go in) but it should do that by ceasing to focus on the Imperium in the way that it does and highlighting how shitty it is in comparison to other factions and the real world, not by sanding off its edges and telling you that actually the Imperium believes in girlbossing and Marneus Calgar says trans rights. I vastly prefer using something in the vein of the Leagues of Votann to explore this space than the Imperium.
So I have to ask because I'm sure what you mean.

When you say. "but it's very clear there's a special reservoir of extra hatred for certain people."

Who exactly are these certain people?

And I also have to ask, going by your last line, it sounds like you don't want GW giving the imperium LGBTQ characters, you'd rather see them added to the league of voltann.

Is this what you intended to say?
 
Orks are technically genderless asexual fungi so they are not actually "male"

it is peak liberalism "isn't it a good thing half of all weapon manufacturers are lead by women" parody. women can be xenophobic imperial dogs too!!/s

Orks are male coded in every way that matters.

Honestly no, given what your definition of a chud is, Warhammer couldn't survive losing 99% of the community.

You have no clue what my definition is. Are you afraid it might include you?

Considering your definition of 'chud' seems to be 'wouldn't like femarines'? *eyeroll* Good luck with that.

This, notably is not my definition.

I think people who would dislike fem marines are wrong, but I don't think non chuds would quit the hobby over female space marines, because, frankly, it's not that important. The only people who would actually lose their shit and quit the hobby are, in fact, the chuds. No one else will.

There's a whole lot about the hobby I am not a fan of (largely business related) that hasn't driven me to burn my armies in a trashcan. People can get over things they don't like for the game, community, or the rest of the lore. It's only people so poisoned by the culture war that the very thought of any progress in something they partake in would lead them to excessively (and probably loudly) doing away with thousands of dollars of models.

It makes them less atrocious in a very surface-level way but that's also why it's insidious. If you know the meta backstory to the issue then the question of the Imperium using more people as Space Marine fodder is understood in that context but if you don't, say if your first introduction to 40k is in 2025, then the Imperium is having the edges increasingly sanded off and that's the context you understand it in. We complain a lot about the Imperium being painted as the good guys but stuff like this is exactly what tricks people who aren't paying attention into seeing it that way. "The Imperium is just doing what's necessary, look there's nothing unfair about it see, they even pick from both sexes for Space Marines." Guilliman's return and reformation of certain aspects of the Imperium play into this in a big way. I think the way the fandom adores the Ultramarines as the 'good guy' Space Marines is genuinely concerning because they're not less cruel, they're just more efficient in their cruelty. The more of these kinds of changes that happen the harder and harder it becomes to intuit that the Imperium is meant to be a critique of the fascist state and the more people will agree that the Imperium is broadly correct.

The reality is that 'I'm an equal opportunity abuser' is pretty much never actually true. You've probably even seen the old meme of racists trying to defend themselves by saying they hate everyone equally or something. It's just not true. They don't hate everyone equally, they might be misanthropic but it's very clear there's a special reservoir of extra hatred for certain people. The Imperium is deeply fascist and part of that is an inherent obsession with masculinity. Many people will say that Space Marines are a juvenile male power fantasy and that's absolutely right, it's exactly what they are.

They were designed this way, they're a product of a mixture of both uncritically accepting certain ideas but also of purposely setting out to make an institution that was violently macho. It's not a boys club by accident, it's a boy club because of course it's a boys club, why would men let women into it? The mission statement of creating a Space Marine is to make the biggest toughest, big mclargehuge guy possible. It's representative both of real-world misogyny and Imperial misogyny that they've convinced themselves by the power of tradition, ego and pseudo-science that this is a necessary division. You can gene-enhance an afab person in 40k but the specific institution of 'the Space Marines' is by boys for boys and that says something that it wouldn't say if you changed it.

The thing is also that despite feeling strongly about this I want to try to be clear that what I care about isn't whether female space marines can exist but the idea that 40k needs to change specifically to pursue market dominance or satisfy customers that aren't me personally currently interested. I understand it exists to make money and Games Workshop will make a - largely financial - decision about this over which I have no control, and if they say female marines can be a thing then they can be. It won't impact my enjoyment of 40k overly much except that I'll have fun making girl berserkers. The decision itself doesn't matter here but the financial-incentive-driven logic piques my concern. It has the effect of making things blander in the name of chasing growth. The number doesn't always have to go up is basically the point.

GW should continue to chase out grognards and Nazis (firstly just because it's the correct thing to do, but also that group has its own terrible ideas for the direction 40k ought to go in) but it should do that by ceasing to focus on the Imperium in the way that it does and highlighting how shitty it is in comparison to other factions and the real world, not by sanding off its edges and telling you that actually the Imperium believes in girlbossing and Marneus Calgar says trans rights. I vastly prefer using something in the vein of the Leagues of Votann to explore this space than the Imperium.

And if GW actually used this as the reason marines are all male, I'd applaud them. But GW continues to present marines as the heroes of the system. But also, the ur document of why marines are all male isn't thematic. It's full thermian in setting justifications using bad bigoted biotruth nonsense written 30 years ago. The reason marines are an all boys club is that, despite the punk origins of 40k, it was made by all male nerds in the 80s and they thought girls had cooties. They didn't think women had a place in wargaming, the prevailing and common sentiment of male nerds in the 80s and 90s.

The reason this hasn't changed is tradition and fear of chuds by those with power to make big decisions on model lines in GW. There's plenty of staff in GW that would be happy for female space marines (and custodes), but can't push through 30 years of inertia to get it done. So they try other avenues, which is why we have a plastic sister range, and most new armies are more gender diverse.

But it absolutely isn't a statement on fascism that marines are all male. It wasn't when marines were invented, and it definitely isn't today where GW spends most of its time carefully managing marines for mass appeal and only rarely acknowledging the dark themes behind them, either by individual authors, or when circumstances force their hand.

GW will never really push marines and the imperium as actually the real villains of the setting, because they make too much money with marines as the face of the setting.
 
You have no clue what my definition is. Are you afraid it might include you?
No, I have a pretty good idea what your definition of a chud is. Just reading it in the urban dictionary was enough to tell me.

And honestly given our history, I know it includes me.

Finally, my reasoning for not wanting female space marines is because it leads to too many unfortunate implications, it's far safer to just leave space marines as cis males especially given the origins of space marines.
 
Last edited:
I don't really care about fem marines either way honestly. I can see why people want their fun power fantasy to be more inclusive, and I think that if warhammer 40k was released last year instead nearly 40 there definitely should and would have female marines but it wasn't so introducing fem marines now would be a pretty abrupt change. That and while I think fem marines work in a more modern 40k environment where space marines are portrayed as generally heroic paragons they don't really work in warhammers original state as a dark thatcherite satire. There, space marines were more monstrous and inhuman, violent prisoners and veterans transformed into drugged up super soldiers. Then it was established that space marines are converted or "groomed" to be warriors from a young age. There was strong themes of toxic masculinity and how culture and society pushes young men into being violent and aggressive and to suppress complex emotions to be better soldiers and workers. That commentary is a uniquely male one or at least very much about men from men's perspective so I think fem marines would water down the metaphor but as I said modern 40k doesn't really lean on its dark satire that much anymore so that criticism is only here or there.
 
Last edited:
That commentary is a uniquely male one or at least very much about men from men's perspective so I think fem marines would water down the metaphor but as I said modern 40k doesn't really lean on its dark satire that much anymore so that criticism is only here or there.
I mean Astartes are basically a bunch of toxic masculinity. With how young men are indoctrinated into hate and become mutilated. With most considering it a honor.
 
And if GW actually used this as the reason marines are all male, I'd applaud them. But GW continues to present marines as the heroes of the system. But also, the ur document of why marines are all male isn't thematic. It's full thermian in setting justifications using bad bigoted biotruth nonsense written 30 years ago. The reason marines are an all boys club is that, despite the punk origins of 40k, it was made by all male nerds in the 80s and they thought girls had cooties. They didn't think women had a place in wargaming, the prevailing and common sentiment of male nerds in the 80s and 90s.

The reason this hasn't changed is tradition and fear of chuds by those with power to make big decisions on model lines in GW. There's plenty of staff in GW that would be happy for female space marines (and custodes), but can't push through 30 years of inertia to get it done. So they try other avenues, which is why we have a plastic sister range, and most new armies are more gender diverse.

But it absolutely isn't a statement on fascism that marines are all male. It wasn't when marines were invented, and it definitely isn't today where GW spends most of its time carefully managing marines for mass appeal and only rarely acknowledging the dark themes behind them, either by individual authors, or when circumstances force their hand.

GW will never really push marines and the imperium as actually the real villains of the setting, because they make too much money with marines as the face of the setting.
Of course the in-universe document is thermian...? Like it's in-universe...? Do you expect Imperial Scholar #1194125 to turn to the camera to explain the thematic meaning to you? I'm struggling to even fully parse what you mean here. Like it's definitionally a statement on fascism, that's what it is to interpret a text, any text. 40k isn't special or unique in how we should study and understand it as an artistic piece. 40k has meaning whether it originally set out to have meaning or not (and 40k definitely originally set out to have meaning).
 
@DeliriumDid you noticed my questions? because I really am struggling to understand what your point is.

So I have to ask because I'm sure what you mean.

When you say. "but it's very clear there's a special reservoir of extra hatred for certain people."

Who exactly are these certain people?

And I also have to ask, going by your last line, it sounds like you don't want GW giving the imperium LGBTQ characters, you'd rather see them added to the league of voltann.

Is this what you intended to say?
 
Back
Top