Malaquez
[MUFFLED EUROBEAT]
- Location
- Singapore
Then what have I been doing all this time?You are aware that if World's Lover wins, I'm never going to stop teasing you with shipping, right?
You. I like the way you think.
Then what have I been doing all this time?You are aware that if World's Lover wins, I'm never going to stop teasing you with shipping, right?
You. I like the way you think.
Doesn't war at least somewhat imply that both opponents are armed?The war part of the "shipping war" is between @Snowfire and the players?
I am armed. With B E L I E F.Doesn't war at least somewhat imply that both opponents are armed?
They would have to be brain dead if not. Amanda (kind of) talked to a shiplord, after all.I just hope that someone in the government reaches out to Amanda to ask her if she wants to meet the aliens.
Well. On the bright side, we'll be having this vote again in four turns.
Eh.You're...actually going to be having it now, because the actions you'll probably want to start taking now with the aim of pursuing a Ministership without portfolio are quite different compared to the ones for putting together a sustainable funding system for a major research facility. That final (honest) vote stage will be out tonight.
Rather undeveloped, due to the direction that you took Amanda in.
I don't think that many people have died at all? I mean, biological aging and disease are all basically things of the past for everyone. The only exception was those poor schlubs in the First Awakening who were too young to have gotten genuine Second Secret biological immortality back when that was available, and had their bodies "locked" into mortality by their Practice and were thus unable to benefit from Prologue.
I don't think the results were THAT much of a landslide, and I think there's a good argument to make that removing the other options may influence some thinking, and there's a tendency for people to not modify their votes after they're cast despite additional information having been brought to light since then. I think there's a reasonably good chance that things could swing.I mean, I like the idea of a second vote, because I really, really think the "Unlimited resources, occasional politics" route of the Minister-without-portfolio is still more interesting and impactful than the "Moderate resources, no politics" route of the NGO-with-totally-not-embezzled-public-funds route, and this gives us hopeful few a second chance to make a first impression, but the votes are pretty commandingly against me at this point. Is there really much point in having a runoff between those two options?
This has been nagging at me a little, so just to put it out there, it wouldn't be a private sector institution (as I've said before, there isn't a private sector in the Practice War verse). This would be a public sector organisation with a very broad mandate and relatively few strings simply because it would probably hoover up 90% of the truly brilliant (Mary-ish level) scientists in the world from simple momentum. In terms of legislation, it would be an extension of the Neverending Journey action chain.
Addressing the rest of your post, I can understand the desire to give the vote a rest, but...hrm. You have a point, to be fair. It just feels like you should have to put some setup time into this, given that people are definitely going to be asking what Amanda will be doing when she comes back from her sabbatical. Also...what @Coda just posted above, because it's a match to my view at present.
I think you might want to describe both options in more detail if you want more discussion about them.
That might be a very good idea, because I was under the very distinct impression that The World's Lover was going to be something like a private sector NGO, mostly divorced from the centers of federal power except for sucking down funding from the government, rather like Boeing or Northrop in the real world, as opposed to Ever Present which would be more like a new governmental department. Now I guess they're not, which begs the question of exactly what each option really is doing.So you know what I said about the vote dropping tonight? Probably not happening, some family on their last night up. Will work on it tomorrow for that evening, and I'll be aiming for a much more detailed description of what the two options involve.
Any questions people have on them would be very welcome.
There's nothing saying we couldn't have had more fine-grained control if we had had reason to try, but I imagine that most of those powers get delegated to people with more specific knowledge/insight/experience about the subject instead of requiring the President herself to do it all. I imagine many of the options that came to us in the form of votes included things like economic plans that had already been ironed out before they landed on our desk, and then resolving all of the decisions would have been hashed out in congress afterward once emergency powers (read: "go as far into debt as necessary") were lifted.As for the whole notion that "there is no private sector"... um, yeah, that doesn't correspond to the world you've developed so far. If 100% of the economy has been flowing through Amanda's office for the last ten years then we ought to have had far, far more fine-grained control over how everything is run; that is, after all, the central advantage of planned economies, which they earn by losing a lot of the decentralized responsiveness that a capitalist system allows.
That might be a very good idea, because I was under the very distinct impression that The World's Lover was going to be something like a private sector NGO, mostly divorced from the centers of federal power except for sucking down funding from the government, rather like Boeing or Northrop in the real world, as opposed to Ever Present which would be more like a new governmental department. Now I guess they're not, which begs the question of exactly what each option really is doing.
As for the whole notion that "there is no private sector"... um, yeah, that doesn't correspond to the world you've developed so far. If 100% of the economy has been flowing through Amanda's office for the last ten years then we ought to have had far, far more fine-grained control over how everything is run; that is, after all, the central advantage of planned economies, which they earn by losing a lot of the decentralized responsiveness that a capitalist system allows.
Sigh, is this like your political system, isn't it, with the fundamental structural problems papered over "because Practice"? Did the Elder First make Practiced Command Economics along with Practiced Synarchical Governance?
I'm a software engineer by trade. Part of my job duties is to figure out what people mean when they haven't given me enough information about the matter at hand.I had a complicated explanation all ready to go, then I read @Coda's reply and realised that once again it was completely unnecessary. Seriously man, have you been stealing my notes or something?
I'm a software engineer by trade. Part of my job duties is to figure out what people mean when they haven't given me enough information about the matter at hand.
I'd like to think I'm good at my job.
What do you mean I'm not omniscient?!