- Location
- California
Did you forget the X's?
It's worth noting that serious protection was available immediately after the wards failed. The wards may be the best at what they do but they aren't the only game in town.
![](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-B7N2GfV7l94/UOgEW1QEgtI/AAAAAAAAEqQ/envtXfIOLhg/s1600/you-didnt-see-anything.gif)
Did you forget the X's?
It's worth noting that serious protection was available immediately after the wards failed. The wards may be the best at what they do but they aren't the only game in town.
It's worth noting that serious protection was available immediately after the wards failed. The wards may be the best at what they do but they aren't the only game in town.
Moreover, while Voldemort could believe in Dumbledore and Snape's assertions, it's very unlike him to not try.
By all indications, the Privet Drive wards are impenetrable to Voldemort. Suggesting otherwise requires assuming Voldemort didn't even try, that Dumbledore doesn't know what he's talking about/is evil, or other silly assumptions like that.
Man, you're persistent....There is not one mention in canon of Voldemort trying. Why it is so unlike him not to try ? He was content to wait school year to kidnap Harry with Cup, playing with Harry for entire school year in dreams in OotP, attack of DEs at the end of HBP was against Dumbledore. Voldemort has other, more important problems to solve than one lazy teenager firmly on Dumbledore´s leash that "attacks" with Expelliarmus.
I could swear that it is accepted that Dumbledore was a man who made many mistakes and his mistakes were greater than mistakes of other people. Why it is so inconceivable that he is perhaps mistaken about sacrificial protection ?
If protections are impenetrable ONLY against Voldemort, isn´t this argument to quickly leave Privet Drive ?
Ani Morison for Sunday Star Times New Zealand - My question is why does Harry keep going back to the Dursleys, when he is closer to the Weasleys than he is to them?
JK Rowling: That has been explained in the books to an extent, it has been explained in the books but possibly you haven't yet finished this book when it is made very clear. Harry receives magical protection from his mother's sacrifice as long as he remains close to her blood. In other words, Aunt Petunia. That protection won't continue to hold once he is a man, once he turns 17 - he is no longer given that protective aura by his mother, so Dumbledore wants him to go back one more time to ensure the protection continues to his 17th birthday and after that he really is on his own.
If protections are impenetrable ONLY against Voldemort, isn´t this argument to quickly leave Privet Drive ?
Also, the fact that Dumbledore does make mistakes (like literally every other person in the world) does not somehow make him prone to making mistakes.
It extends to other people who are tied to Voldemort, as well.One last question then. Word of God does not specify extent of that protection. Only against Voldemort or intent-based ?
Dumbledore would have been my first choice, to be honest. It allows somewhat less freedom of movement than the Dursleys, perhaps, but access to Dumbledore and Hogwarts more than makes up for it, in my opinion.I've already mentioned that I don't think the Dursleys are the best option. That being said, if the number one priority is 'protection against Voldemort', then they are the best option, this is simple fact, stated in the books and by WoG. You just have to determine if that is your priority, and the priority Harry would have.
From my point of view, Dumbledore is most prone to making mistakes in HP.
if we get a portkey to Japan we may be able to eat Re-monster and similar mangas , tought this is unlikely since we had to change from D&D 3.5 to AD&D (am I the only one who would prefer the former ?)
An Owl with an exploding letter address to Lord Potter (Since we ARE Lord Potter, it'll work) since by emancipating ourselves, the Post redirect Ward from Dumbles will fall.
Lord Potter, the BWL, is a public figure with seats and rights and whatnot and the emancipation makes him MORE a public figure, since an emancipated 11 year old IS news (and thus will be discussed and commented about in the Prophet for days) as opposed to a student who just happens to be the BWL (which wasn't even announced in the papers that we was at Hogwarts)
In canon, he was just a boy, not worth his time yet, not Lord Potter, BWL and Emancipated 11-year old who rejected Dumbles' protection. Maybe you're right, but a target that is highlighting himself is a bigger target.
Ron was jealous just because of a broom or just becuase of a submission of a name into a death match. Emancipated Harry has VAULTS OF GOLD, PROPERTIES and SEATS on the Wizagamot. that would be Jeaousy x1000000000. Hermione doesn't care, but there would still be a divide. Just because you're friends with, say, the Duke of Cambridge doesn't mean you are worried about offending the Heir to the Throne with your Common-ness.
Fine. Screw Ron. But it may affect the others (not Luna or Neville, but maybe others)
@Halpo133 can we teach our D&D spells to regular wizards?
Because if the answer is yes I suspect the Ministry will pay a lot for Comprehend Languages and maybe some of them others too depending on their limitations.
Question about Magic of the Multiverse: what actually qualifies a book as being a valid target for it? Is there any reason we couldn't write our own book series with a fictional magic system and then devour that, for example? Or a manual for a homebrew unpublished rpg, or short story scribbled in the margins of our homework, and so on?
No. No you cannot. What you can do, however, is pick up the Write spell, use that to scribe spells to scrolls, and then one other can learn from that scroll. If you want more to know, other scrolls would have to be made.
Not a mistake. Kept Voldemort close, and he had Snape keep an eye on him in addition to that. He even set up a trap for him to deal with him.
One mistake, though an understandable one given Lockhart's credentials. And unlike what fanfiction would have you believe, there were no flaws or holes in his story in his books.
Another, but even more understandable - he was exactly like Moody, down to his idiosyncrasies.
Not a mistake, but a part of an overarching plan. Which did succeed, even though Harry's intervention was unexpected.
What, the first time? At that time, Crouch went ahead and sent him to Azkaban without a trial, with Sirius not protesting his innocence nor appearing innocent in any manner. So, a mistake, but again one that made sense. The second time, he had no choice in the matter, given the Minister's decision.
... How was this his fault? They went and Kissed the guy while he was somewhere else and unable to intercede.
He did do quite a bit to persuade Fudge. It just didn't manage anything, because Fudge had a good deal of issues and insecurity regarding Dumbledore, which colored their interactions and made him unwilling to accept Dumbledore's words.
Uh, while a lot is made of Dumbledore's 'great political power' in fanfiction, in reality it's actually not that high in Britain. He's not a politician, nor has he participated in politics to a particularly great extent (and, in fact, has taken great pains to stay away from it because he can't trust himself with it), and the power of the press and the ministry was always on Fudge's side. Might as well blame Harry for not being able to outduel Snape.
Yep, an acknowledged mistake, but again an understandable one considering his backstory.
Three actual, clear mistakes from your list. And many characters have done far, far more mistakes than he has, even if I treat every incident in your list as accurate (including Harry, Snape, etc.)
I always found the concept really stupid, not least of which because the idea of a family with the name Potter being ancestral lords just sounds unlikely. I think most of the supposition comes from Dorea having married into the family and Sirius hanging out with James, but if the Blacks were on the top of the social pile, they would have had to marry into potential up and comers to stay there, so it makes sense. Probably the same reason why Bellatrix and Narcissa married who they did.2) There is no Lord Potter. Harry Potter is Harry Potter, Boy-Who-Lived. Never once is the Potter family mentioned to be lords of anything, anywhere except fanfiction.
It has to be printed and published and of a certain, undefined length. So no self-written books, no homebrew RPGs, no short stories.