Lets Read: World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War

OOC: I mean, didn't Brooks write a short story about Vampires in a Zombie setting?

I think it became a whole comic series actually, though I'm getting that info second hand.

Yep, The Extinction Parade. It's cool that it's set in Malaysia and it has some interesting stuff on the perspective vampires have on the world and how these are old school, evil bastard megalomaniac vamps, but I don't really recall anything much beyond that. Except that one of the vampires invents the most video game-ass way to kill zombies ever, including in actual video games.
She does in infinite jumping combo, kicking each zed in the head as she lands on it and propelling herself back upwards to the next one.
 
Yep, The Extinction Parade. It's cool that it's set in Malaysia and it has some interesting stuff on the perspective vampires have on the world and how these are old school, evil bastard megalomaniac vamps, but I don't really recall anything much beyond that. Except that one of the vampires invents the most video game-ass way to kill zombies ever, including in actual video games.
The only other thing I remember about it is that it was very obviously intended to be a metaphor for climate change--the vampires knew the zombie apocalypse was a threat to them (because even though, iirc, they couldn't become zombies, it was wiping out their food supply, i.e. humans), but basically didn't do anything about it until it was too late.
 
and that the new governments will 'uncompromisingly' shoot their way back across the continent with big armies of Hard (TM) light infantry who will also be shooting the "lame-O's" and of course "feral bulls" they meet along the way.
As I said earlier in thread, there's actually very little 'light infantry fetishism' in WWZ? That's a Lind thing, light infantry are Jaegers or skirmishers or rangers or special forces. What Max Brooks is fetishizing is vast columns of men moving slowly across the country, heavily armed, fighting in mass formation. They even explicitly, stupidly, refuse to retreat from an enemy they can easily outmaneuver. That's not 'light infantry', that's textbook heavy infantry.
Max Brooks is something rarer and weirder, a fetishist for Napoleonic line warfare (except without all the artillery and cavalry because that's complicated and lame). You can sort of see how it comes about - the key to victory in this style of warfare is that the line does not break. It subsumes the skill of the individual to the whole, subsumes the will of the individual to the whole, becoming a single-minded machine of violence.

Of course, that's bad when you do it with computers (see Land Warrior), but that's because... I don't know, technology... bad? Unless it's MTHEL assault guns or high explosive .303 rounds or robot anti-zombie bees.

They can only be killed by a shot to the head, nevermind that bombs would trivially inflict the same kind of trauma? Now we're entering "this is bullshit" territory.
Yeah. I've long maintained 'practically indestructible' is a far better trait for your enemy to have even in the kind of story where 'can't be beaten by conventional forces' is part of premise, compared to 'actually indestructible'. Because when the enemy is practically indestructible, you can see ways to overcome that indestructability and see their difficulty, and thus appreciate the merits of the Alternative Du Jour, whether that be giant robots, magical girls, or an entrenching tool to the skull.
If the enemy is actually indestructible, then my response is less 'ah yeah I see why that'd be a problem' and more 'bullshit'.
WWZ's zombies are impractically indestructible. They aren't actually indestructible but behave in a way that triggers that same 'bullshit' response. The source of their indestructibility, while limited, has that same sort of arbitrary-ness, and while something like 'you can't kill zombies with artillery, because zombies are animated by evil magic and you need strong intent to break the curse' would fit just fine, the insistence that 'zombies are actually perfectly plausible, they just can be killed by head trauma from a baseball bat but not a blastwave because... uh, shut up' doesn't... doesn't meld.

What you can't do is have everyone in universe and out of universe say that this is a completely legitimate non-supernatural event and then expect it to be taken seriously.
Yeah, like... the thing is that zombie's properties don't fully derive from Solanum's premise, and people don't even acknowledge Solanum's premise in-universe.
Like having a character acknowledge 'yeah our scientists are still trying to figure out where the zombies' energy comes from, it doesn't really make sense, but we're pretty sure it's not literally demons from hell.'* would go a long way. Is it 'supernatural' in that it breaks the laws of physics? Yeah more or less. Is it 'supernatural' in that it exists on a transcendental plane of mythos, cosmic forces, and divinity? No.

By insisting that no this is all clearly perfectly normal, nevermind the perpetual motion, it exposes the rational explanation as patent nonsense, so it's natural to reach for a second-order supernatural explanation, which regardless of truth promises explanatory power. They can keep going despite having no energy source because their energy comes from the underworld. They can find humans despite having no functional eyes because they can sense your fear. They can survive any injury except a direct strike to the head because they hate us that much. It's not empirical but it has a kind of logic, and in the absence of solid evidence 'wrong' answers will abound.

*'Also, y'know, we haven't had all that much room to freely experiment with the zombies on account of the fact they're zombies and we're trying not to get eaten by them'
 
This was obviously not doctrine. No army on Earth could in genuine sincerity, try to clear a continent by lining soldiers up in a big long string and walking across.
I've read a sci-fi book - was probably too young for it, it had zero-g smexy times - where an island full of possessed were "squeezed" by an army.

An army of purpose made warrior forms, piloted by the dead (hey, Wraithknights), and they still had a rough time.

That kind of tactic, against zombies, by normal humans? Across a whole continent? Pathetically moronic
 
I've read a sci-fi book - was probably too young for it, it had zero-g smexy times - where an island full of possessed were "squeezed" by an army.

An army of purpose made warrior forms, piloted by the dead (hey, Wraithknights), and they still had a rough time.

That kind of tactic, against zombies, by normal humans? Across a whole continent? Pathetically moronic
It was actually a peninsula :V

Also, they have a vast array of orbital sensors looking down on the area and the possessed clustered together for safety and because they're people. Arguably, the liberation force had an easier time than you would against zombies.
 
As I said earlier in thread, there's actually very little 'light infantry fetishism' in WWZ? That's a Lind thing, light infantry are Jaegers or skirmishers or rangers or special forces. What Max Brooks is fetishizing is vast columns of men moving slowly across the country, heavily armed, fighting in mass formation. They even explicitly, stupidly, refuse to retreat from an enemy they can easily outmaneuver. That's not 'light infantry', that's textbook heavy infantry.
As I understand it, the distinction between light and heavy infantry mostly comes down to equipment. If you've got one set of infantry with lighter armor and a bunch of javelins to throw before getting stuck in melee, and another set of infantry with heavier armor and a big shield, the former is probably light infantry and the latter is probably heavy. Heavy infantry doesn't maneuver much compared to light infantry, because light infantry is better at fighting on the move than heavy infantry.

Importantly, most people I've read don't see much point in distinguishing between "light" and "heavy" unless there is both light and heavy infantry on the field. The only infantry in this theater are the soldiers—and it's made clear that there's only one type, each armed with a customizable rifle that can be refitted to handle any combat situation—and the zombies, which are even more maneuverable than the soldiers.

I guess the point I'm getting at is that heavy infantry are tactically slothful because they have to be, while WWZ's battle line is tactically slothful because they chose to be. It's not a question of unit type, but strategic priorities. The only way to make sense of it is to assume (as veteranMoral did) that high command was more worried about the political implications of retreat (even local retreat) than the action on the ground.

...while something like 'you can't kill zombies with artillery, because zombies are animated by evil magic and you need strong intent to break the curse' would fit just fine, the insistence that 'zombies are actually perfectly plausible, they just can be killed by head trauma from a baseball bat but not a blastwave because... uh, shut up' doesn't... doesn't meld.
I'm trying not to restart that argument, but I still think that's a problem with Brooks's understanding of how artillery works (big concussion grenade vs. lots of high-velocity shrapnel) and not Brooks's zombies.
Artillery that kills by fluid overpressure wouldn't affect zombies, because zombies aren't sensitive to things that would make living tissues shut down. If they can walk across the ocean floor, they can handle a little air pressure. The problem is that artillery does not kill by fluid overpressure.

Sure, Brooks's assertion that artillery is useless against zombies is dumb either way, but it's dumb in a way that's irrelevant to a discussion on the qualities of Brooks's zombies. The artillery thing is about as absurd as a hikikomori climbing down the side of a skyscraper on a bedsheet while starving and dehydrated, but neither of those facts has a place in a discussion about the zombies themselves.

Take away Brooks's dumb ideas about how weapons work and you're left with stuff like "zombies can't starve" and "zombies don't rot," which are basically just the essentials needed for a zombie story to work.
 
The term "light infantry" in an ancient context is usually about how much heavy equipment, especially body armor, the infantry carries. Heavy infantry tends to fight in formation and march around slowly in big blocks because that's generally optimal for a large group of men with heavy protective gear.

But as I understand it, in a modern context, "light infantry" means something a little different. Broadly speaking, it means "infantry who are tactically expected to be able to march long distances, and expected to march, because they aren't defined chiefly by the vehicles they ride around in."

Thus the 'light infantry' may end up fighting in static gunlines; what defines them is that they don't have a lot of trucks or crew-served heavy weapons.
 
Goodbyes, Part 1
Goodbyes, Part 1

There's a series of - relatively - short interviews here, so I'll be blitzing through them as much as I can.

Article:
BURLINGTON, VERMONT

[Snow has begun falling. Reluctantly, "the Whacko" turns back for the house.]


You ever heard of Clement Attlee? Of course not, why should you? Man was a loser, a third-rate mediocrity who only slipped into the history books because he unseated Winston Churchill before World War II officially ended.


America's last civilian president is up first, and like… immediately he makes me really, really mad.

This is like, the stance that the British government has started to try to push, and it is absolutely deranged - the National Health Service and welfare state were the largest successes of the left in Britain ever, and neither of them surviving the war is a not insubstantial part of why their whole edifice is one bad week away from large scale rioting.

Article:
Churchill kept pushing to help the United States against Japan, saying the fight wasn't finished until it was finished everywhere. And look what happened to the Old Lion. That's what we didn't want to happen to our administration. That's exactly why we decided to declare victory once the continental U.S. had been secured.


The "we could've kept fighting, honest!" stance is always laughable, but here especially - the Junta was never more obviously running on fumes than when they'd just finished the cross-continental push.

Six percent of their population from behind the Rockies died on the advance - that's not six percent of the army, it's six percent of the entire population - and then they had to reintegrate their loyal enclaves whilst keeping the boot on the neck of the thirty million or so survivors of the Christian States and the Great Lakes.

America did not have two spare soldiers to rub together after they reached the Atlantic.

Which, I mean - that isn't a million miles from the reason why Britain couldn't send more men out east, though-

Okay so as briefly as possible, because I'm not a British Nationalist and I don't care that much about defending 'our honour' in WWII but like…

Britain and the Empire absolutely was already involved in the war against Japan, you historically illiterate fuck. The Japanese didn't just decide to leave Singapore and Malaysia for fun, idiot.

Gah. I don't even care, I just find this myth frustrating. It's all part of the general attempt to downplay the historical fact, which was that the British public voted for the Labour Party because they wanted it, not just because they were temporarily unhappy with the tories.

Article:
We still had to help out our allies and clear whole parts of the world that were entirely ruled by the dead. There was still so much work to do, but since our own house was in order, we had to give people the option to go home.


Of their military strength at the end of the war - approximately 11 million people under arms - in the three years immediately after they declared victory, the Junta demobilised four million, with approximately one million of those being the soldiers no longer mentally or physically competent to continue waging war. [SOURCE]

The 'option' to go home existed, but by and large they still needed their troops to occupy swathes of their own country.

Honestly this whole revisionist hagiography of the post-war in America is funny because it just doesn't pass the sniff test, right? What American government since Woodrow fucking Wilson would look at the opportunity to define a post-war world order by taking charge and go "actually I think I'll pass"

They ran the reclamation through the UN because it let them hit up some of their allies more brazenly - now say "thank you Brazil" if the UN saved you.

Anyway, he talks about American volunteers to join the UN reclamation force - I'll just note these volunteers weren't, like, demobilised civilians? They were serving in the US military and volunteered to be part of its contribution to the UN force.

Article:
We actually had to turn some of them away, put them on the reserve list or assign them to train all the young bucks who missed the drive across America. I know I caught a lot of flak for going UN instead of making it an all-American crusade, and to be totally honest, I really couldn't give a damn.


They always do this - they invent these groups that are mythically criticising them from some position even more out-there than their own, so they can ignore the legitimate criticisms they were receiving. Once you notice, it becomes really obvious. "Oh, everyone wanted it to be an All-American Crusade but I bravely refused" yeah, sure.

On the other note - America had to recruit heavily from areas they were still in the process of pacifying, but even then, this is mostly theatre? He's alleging that they were training "all the young bucks" to imply that they had a glut of new recruits, that the Junta remained popularly supported.

They picked up an initial wave of recruits from places like Lafayette and Baton Rouge, Memphis, St Louis, the Blue Zones that were the most grateful once they arrived, but other than that, they'd put people into the army as a sort of punitive action, to break up organisations in occupied areas?

This has worked really well and had no consequences. Training your own dissident population in combat is a good plan.

Article:
Maybe it's made the overseas campaigns a little slower. Our allies are on their feet again, but we still have a few White Zones to clear: mountain ranges, snowline islands, the ocean floor, and then there's Iceland…Iceland's gonna be tough.


I love the American hubris here, they genuinely cannot help themselves - oh, if we'd refused to coordinate with our allies and just done this global war against the ghouls all on our own? We'd have been fine. Better, actually, than doing it with our allies! We're number one!

Genuinely just pretty pathetic.

I think on some level it is to try to explain away their failings - Iceland is still uninhabited, and likely to remain so for a long time, but that's not because America and her allies don't have the strength to clear Iceland, it's that they let the UN do it! I don't really see the point, personally. Iceland is going to need clearing out eventually, sure, but for now? The ghouls on Iceland aren't really doing any harm.

Article:
I wish Ivan would let us help out in Siberia, but, hey, Ivan's Ivan. And we still have attacks right here at home as well, every spring, or every so often near a lake or beach. The numbers are declining, thank heavens, but it doesn't mean people should let down their guard. We're still at war, and until every trace is sponged, and purged, and, if need be, blasted from the surface of the Earth, everybody's still gotta pitch in and do their job.


… So shut up about wanting elections.

It will always be funny when some American freakshow gets up on their hobbyhorse about not being allowed to send troops into Siberia to prop up the HRE. God knows I'm glad that malignancy has been annihilated, but it has lost us some of the dumbest angry American takes, and that is a shame.

Watching some US General squirming on one of their psychotically nationalist TV interviews because the talking head has asked them why America won't help the Russians out against the Damned Reds and they have to talk around the truth, which is that they don't think they'd win.

The rest of this is just, as referenced, the Junta's excuseology for why the parties haven't split again, why the military is still privileged over everyone else, why most everyone is either in or controlled by the army and so on - it's because otherwise, Zack's gonna climb out of the lake and getcha! Scary!

Article:
Be nice if that was the lesson people took from all this misery. We're all in this together, so pitch in and do your job.

[We stop by an old oak tree. My companion looks it up and down, taps it lightly with his cane. Then, to the tree…]

You're doin' a good job.


He just says it, here - the lesson you should take from this is put your head down and don't rock the boat. Stop complaining, stop wanting civil rights.

As for the oak tree thing? I've got nothing. No idea what he meant by this. Maybe he's just senile.

On the plus side, I never have to think about this dipshit again. Moving away from an American talking about Russia to a Russian talking about Russia.



Article:
KHUZHIR, OLKHON ISLAND, LAKE BAIKAL, THE HOLY RUSSIAN EMPIRE

[A nurse interrupts our interview to make sure Maria Zhuganova takes her prenatal vitamins. Maria is four months pregnant. This will be her eighth child.]


The Reds found Maria in the last camp they liberated, just outside Vladivostok. She's given an interview from a bed on one of their hospital-trains on the trans-siberian railroad, which you can view [HERE] and read the translated transcript [HERE] if you don't speak Russian.

Three of the children the Holy Russian Empire forced her to have, so far as she knew, made it out of infancy. Hers has been a bleak, bleak life.

Article:
My only regret was that I couldn't remain in the army for the "liberation" of our former republics. We'd purged the motherland of the undead filth, and now it was time to carry the war beyond our borders. I wish I could have been there, the day we formally reabsorbed Belarus back into the empire. They say it will be the Ukraine soon, and after that, who knows. I wish I could still have been a participant, but I had "other duties"…


This is really funny when you recognise the surgery done on it - the HRE obviously was not absorbing Belarus, and the "former republics" they were at war with were, like… Sakha, Buryatia and Altai?

So far as I know - and I'm not knowledgeable on the subject, so please don't cite me! - the Ukrainian Civil War has precipitated any plans by the RSFSR to move into the country. They might do so later, but for the foreseeable, I expect the war with Japan they are hurtling towards is going to occupy them, anyway.

Article:
[Gently, she pats her womb.]

I don't know how many clinics like this there are throughout the Rodina. Not enough, I'm sure. So few of us, young, fertile women who didn't succumb to drugs, or AIDS, or the stink of the living dead. Our leader says that the greatest weapon a Russian woman can wield now is her uterus. If that means not knowing my children's fathers, or…


There were fifteen main camps, with several dozen satellite camps for care of the babies and processing the fathers. It was the single most well-planned and well-operated part of the decaying Holy Russian Imperial state.

They kept remarkably complete records, and people are working as we speak on tracking down the children taken from these women, the scientists who ran these camps and the men who frequented them.

I don't know if justice is ever going to come, not exactly, but people are giving it the best try they are capable of giving, I think. That's not making this any easier to read.

Article:
You're wondering how this "existence" can be reconciled with our new fundamentalist state? Well, stop wondering, it can't. All that religious dogma, that's for the masses. Give them their opium and keep them pacified. I don't think anyone in the leadership, or even the Church, really believes what they're preaching, maybe one man, old Father Ryzhkov before they chucked him out into the wilderness. He had nothing left to offer, unlike me. I've got at least a few more children to give the motherland. That's why I'm treated so well, allowed to speak so freely.


There's this idea people have - a peculiarly persuasive one, and one that's very popular under the Junta - that cynicism somehow makes more "sense" than anything else. That cynics have some inherent bonus to states they run, to their ability to organise things.

The Holy Russian Empire hardly believed a word of the theology they spouted, they just flailed desperately for whatsoever they could find to prop up their state, and they were put down like dogs by a bunch of bright eyed idealists flying the red flag.

Article:
[Maria glances at the one-way glass behind me.]

What are they going to do to me? By the time I've exhausted my usefulness, I will have already outlived the average woman.

[She presents the glass with an extremely rude finger gesture.]


Recognising that it is hard to do these calculations on a state that didn't last a lifetime, the average life expectancy of a woman in one of these camps was about 50, versus an average life expectancy of a woman not in one of these camps of about 62.

All told, though, this is just… wildly depressing.

Article:
Your mission is to tell your world of ours, to make them see what will happen if anyone ever tries to f**k with us. The war drove us back to our roots, made us remember what it means to be Russian. We are strong again, we are feared again, and to Russians, that only means one thing, we are finally safe again! For the first time in almost a hundred years, we can finally warm ourselves in the protective fist of a Caesar, and I'm sure you know the word for Caesar in Russian.


This, on the other hand, is fucking hysterical. Some Okhrana weirdo tried to make this a threat when it was meant to be a puff piece to compel the Americans to back them harder - it failed on both fronts, and their vile little Tsar got fitted for a hemp necktie off the barrel of a tank.

A miserable story with at least a slightly hopeful ending. Let us all have that chance!

There's not a lot more to add, honestly? All power to the soviets and what have you. Onto the next.



Article:
BRIDGETOWN, BARBADOS, WEST INDIES FEDERATION

[The bar is almost empty. Most of the patrons have either left by their own power, or been carried out by the police. The last of the night staff clean the broken chairs, broken glass, and pools of blood off the floor. In the corner, the last of the South Africans sings an emotional, inebriated version of Johnny Clegg's wartime rendition of "Asimbonaga." T. Sean Collins absentmindedly hums a few bars, then downs his shot of rum, and hurriedly signals for another.]


The Federation's absolute no exception refusal to have any sort of extradition with anyone is an extremely strong principle.

It's almost respectable, but it is mostly used by people like this to avoid arrest for all the blood that soaks their hands.

Collins was a brute - it wasn't exactly a surprise that he was a functional alcoholic, drowning in war like that.

Article:
I'm addicted to murder, and that's about the nicest way I can put it. You might say that's not technically true, that since they're already dead I'm not really killing. Horseshit; it's murder, and it's a rush like nothing else. Sure, I can dis those prewar mercenaries all I want, the 'Nam vets and Hell's Angels, but at this point I'm no different from them, no different from those jungle humpers who never came home, even when they did, or those World War II fighter jocks who traded in their Mustangs for hogs. You're living on such a high, so keyed up all the time, that anything else seems like death.


Being addicted to murder is one of the most pathetic excuses I've heard for being a war criminal, I'll be honest, but I can see how he came to it.

See, you can't claim to be an adrenaline junkie without admitting that you aren't just fighting a diminishing number of slouching corpses; there's not enough adrenaline there, obviously. So instead he pretended it was just the act of killing them that got his jollies off.

But hey, I don't know - maybe he really was addicted to the act of killing them.

Article:
I tried to fit in, settle down, make some friends, get a job and do my part to help put America back together. But not only was I dead, I couldn't think about anything else but killing. I'd start to study people's necks, their heads. I'd think, "Hmmmm, that dude's probably got a thick frontal lobe, I gotta go in through the eye socket." Or "hard blow to the occipital'd drop that chick pretty fast." It was when the new prez, "the Whacko"—Jesus, who the hell am I to call anybody else that?—when I heard him speak at a rally, I must have thought of at least fifty ways to bring him down.


I mean, this is just normal adjustment to not being in combat any more? If you agree with him here, if you read this and think it makes sense?

You're desensitised. You need therapy; you're not a murderous savant or anything, you're just traumatised. This is just trauma. Just get help.

Article:
I said good-bye and joined the Impisi, same name as the South African Special Forces. Impisi: Zulu for Hyena, the one who cleans up the dead.

We're a private outfit, no rules, no red tape, which is why I chose them over a regular gig with the UN. We set our own hours, choose our own weapons.


I'm sure you'll be stunned to hear that a South African mercenary outfit hiring cracked American soldiers? Not great dudes.

They're a proscribed organisation in most countries in the world - they were used a lot by the USSA to crush any dissidents within their Cape strongholds, which was always a little awkward, because it becomes very difficult to think you're the good guys when your allies are using mercenaries to gun down Black people. They then got deployed to Namibia and have been part of the total collapse of USSA forces in the area.

Article:
[He motions to what looks like a sharpened steel paddle at his side.]

"Pouwhenua"—got it from a Maori brother who used to play for the All Blacks before the war. Bad motherfuckers, the Maori. That battle at One Tree Hill, five hundred of them versus half of reanimated Auckland. The pouwhenua's a tough weapon to use, even if this one's steel instead of wood.


Aotearoa had an interesting war - they had a bad start, no doubt, but by and large recovered remarkably fast, even if it was a pretty "decentralised" recovery - they didn't have anything even approaching a central government until remarkably late, just bands of survivors of varying sizes, patchwork across the North and South Islands.

I don't know that they're going to have much success in just slowly drifting into direct democracy and collective ownership whilst remaining in the American camp, but if they can do it, more power to them, I guess?

I suppose "the American camp" is becoming something of a moot point, so there's that.

Article:
I still got hope. Sounds crazy, but you never know. That's why I save most of my fees instead of giving back to the host country or blowing it on who knows what. It can happen, finally getting the monkey off your back. A Canadian brother, "Mackee" Macdonald, right after clearing Baffin Island, he just decided he'd had enough. I hear he's in Greece now, some monastery or something.


Baffin Island being "clear" is funny, but other than that - Stan MacDonald has given interviews on this topic before, but I specifically did email him about Collins knowing his name and having a nickname for him?

Various American special forces served alongside Canadian light infantry units in the latter stages of Canada's sweep and clear operation, and on one occasion, Collins's unit was saved from a snowstorm by a Canadian patrol heading back to base, and they spent a few weeks cooped up in the barracks with the others; that was apparently the moment MacDonald knew he'd have to set an endpoint for his war, looking at these shark-eyed American soldiers practically thrumming with unspent violent energy.

Article:
Maybe there's still a life out there for me. Hey, a man can dream, right? Of course, if it doesn't work out that way, if one day there's still a monkey but no more Zack…

[He rises to leave, shouldering his weapon.]

Then the last skull I crack'll probably be my own.


On the third of December, 2033, T. Sean Collins was found in a bodybag in the walk-in fridge in the Impisi Company's base in Oranjemund when it was overrun. Despite the level of decomposition, the attending Medical Officer, Major Ana de Armas, judged that the cause of death was a bullet wound, likely from a rifle, from extremely close range, up through the jaw and into his brain. Time of death was broadly congruent with their orders to move further into Namibia and liquidate civilian resistance.

For what little credit the man deserves - and do remember, he was an indicted war criminal - when he was given an unambiguous order to go out and commit massacres, he did, actually, choose death first.



Article:
SAND LAKES PROVINCIAL WILDERNESS PARK, MANITOBA, CANADA

[Jesika Hendricks loads the last of the day's "catch" into the sled, fifteen bodies and a mound of dismembered parts.]


I try not to be angry, bitter at the unfairness of it all. I wish I could make sense of it.


Not to directly contradict her statement - and she is making a legitimate point about how resentment can poison your ability to heal, and God only knows I'm aware enough of that - but she absolutely should be angry. The US government, with malice and knowledge aforethought, decided to send as many of their population to die in the Canadian wasteland as they could get away with.

Anger is not an unreasonable response. She was betrayed, and it killed her parents.

Article:
I once met an ex-Iranian pilot who was traveling through Canada looking for a place to settle down. He said that Americans are the only people he's ever met who just can't accept that bad things can happen to good people.


Planning to start a study into whether Major Ahmed Farahnakian is the best and most convincing sarcastic in the world, or whether Americans are just uniquely credulous.

Article:
Last week I was listening to the radio and just happened to hear [name withheld for legal reasons]. He was doing his usual thing—fart jokes and insults and adolescent sexuality—and I remember thinking, "This man survived and my parents didn't." No, I try not to be bitter.


I get this. I look at some of the people who survived and I just feel this terrible, unfair anger and resentment in my chest, because my family didn't. She's not wrong.

But it isn't healthy - it isn't the fault of some radio shockjock that her parents died, and dwelling on the unfairness is just going to hurt, just going to retraumatise her.

Everyone alive still has scars from this war, and they're never going away.



Article:
TROY, MONTANA, USA

[Mrs. Miller and I stand on the back deck, above the children playing in the central courtyard.]


You can blame the politicians, the businessmen, the generals, the "machine," but really, if you're looking to blame someone, blame me. I'm the American system, I'm the machine. That's the price of living in a democracy; we all gotta take the rap.


This is such a bold start though, I have to say. She just outright says that this was her fault, not the fault of the Government or the military - its the same shit they prodded Jesika into saying - this isn't the fault of the government, they didn't fuck over their population, it was really everyone's fault, and everyone bears collective responsibility for it.

And they sort of drip in here the idea that like… Democracy is innate to the "American system" even if it means you've all got to take responsibility. It's a slow walk of "actually we don't have democracy but that's fine" to avoid upsetting people. Like boiling a frog.

Article:
I can see why it took so long for China to finally embrace it, and why Russia just said "fuck it" and went back to whatever they call their system now. Nice to be able to say, "Hey, don't look at me, it's not my fault." Well, it is. It is my fault, and the fault of everyone of my generation.

[She looks down at the children.]


Complicated riddle, right; is this the real unfiltered foreign policy opinion of an American suburban fascist, or is it what the State Department wanted to have her say?

I think it could be either - Americans remain touchy about the Russians having gone "back to whatever they call their system now," because they were really happy to proclaim that the Cold War had settled the debate, right? - but I'd lean towards them being her unfiltered opinions because she grants that China is a democracy, and the Americans, ah, really don't want to do that.

Article:
I wonder what future generations will say about us. My grandparents suffered through the Depression, World War II, then came home to build the greatest middle class in human history. Lord knows they weren't perfect, but they sure came closest to the American dream. Then my parents' generation came along and fucked it all up—the baby boomers, the "me" generation.


I will never understand the preoccupation with the "middle class" - it was the same in Britain, maybe even worse. Class analysis being whittled down to useless and uninformative insights on, like, income and income alone.

So far as it exists, the middle class is made up of educated proletarians despised by the bourgeoisie, and insecure petit-bourgeoisie who make up the footsoldiers of fascism.

I suppose the hangup is specifically about hearkening back to the "greatest generation" who "built" the American middle class, but I mean, the thing that built the American middle class was inheriting rule over most of the world because they effectively owned the previous hegemon outright.

This sort of nostalgia is always just nostalgia for when America was on top.

Article:
And then you got us. Yeah, we stopped the zombie menace, but we're the ones who let it become a menace in the first place. At least we're cleaning up our own mess, and maybe that's the best epitaph to hope for. "Generation Z, they cleaned up their own mess."


And this is just more of the American Junta's push for collective ownership of governmental fuckups. Worthless.

Glancing at the book some more, I'll probably only do one more interview this update.



Article:
Chongqing, China

[Kwang Jingshu does his final house call for the day, a little boy with some kind of respiratory illness. The mother fears it's another case of tuberculosis. The color returns to her face when the doctor assures her it's just a chest cold. Her tears and gratitude follow us down the dusty street.]


There's no getting around it - Public Health has, globally, crashed over the course of the war. There's some positives - the pharmaceutical companies largely have not survived, so a lot of patents aren't enforceable any more - but generally, it's really not good. Antibiotics are not trivial to get, and major operations are riskier now than they have been in decades. It's just… bad.

Article:
It's comforting to see children again, I mean those who were born after the war, real children who know nothing but a world that includes the living dead. They know not to play near water, not to go out alone or after dark in the spring or summer. They don't know to be afraid, and that is the greatest gift, the only gift we can leave to them.


It is genuinely a novel experience, talking to children - a lot of my friends have started having them, and they're reaching the age where they can actually talk to you, now.

They have the attitude towards this that every adults strives for, but cannot reach - acceptance. Pure and unfettered; there are ghouls, but they are just part of life, like trucks on the road, or deep ponds, fast rivers. Something to be aware of, something to avoid, but not something to keep you up at night. Not something so alien and absurd, but so undeniably real that the fear of it can never leave.

It helps, actually! Grounds you in the knowledge that the world will continue. We will continue.

Article:
Sometimes I think of that old woman at New Dachang, what she lived through, the seemingly unending upheaval that defined her generation. Now that's me, an old man who's seen his country torn to shreds many times over. And yet, every time, we've managed to pull ourselves together, to rebuild and renew our nation. And so we will again—China, and the world. I don't really believe in an afterlife—the old revolutionary to the end—but if there is, I can imagine my old comrade Gu laughing down at me when I say, with all honesty, that everything's going to be all right.


I wish I had the same confidence, but I'm working on it, at least.

I will probably call it here - I'll get the second half of Goodbyes out another time.

Make contact with your local leftist groups - I'm not going to list every leftist group in the world for y'all, but there'll be some about, I'm sure.

Donate to the Sanatorium for Infirm Women in Russia [HERE]; the fall of the HRE has not magically meant this isn't still needed.

Donate to a South American group of your choice [HERE] - it's a masterlist. Exciting to see the list get shorter for good reasons!

Donate to the Namibian Relief Fund [HERE] - the war's out of their country, but they aren't out of the woods, the country is pretty devastated.

Donate to the Red Cross [HERE] - wars are getting ugly across the world, they could use the help.

Oh, and if you're in Britain - Raise that scarlet standard high, comrade.


AN: Literally just one more update, I think. I'm so nearly done with this damn book.
 
Last edited:
I think the bit with the tree is because it's still here, it's still growing, it's still alive and doing what it is meant to.

An appeal to steadfastness and survival.
 
Churchill kept pushing to help the United States against Japan, saying the fight wasn't finished until it was finished everywhere. And look what happened to the Old Lion. That's what we didn't want to happen to our administration. That's exactly why we decided to declare victory once the continental U.S. had been secured.

I'm no apologist for the British empire but the fuck is this shit? British troops were fighting Japan till the end of hostilities against Japan. Churchil got booted cause the British public didn't want to return to the pre-war status quo of legless veterans starving in doorways, which was what happened between the wars.
 
AN: Literally just one more update, I think. I'm so nearly done with this damn book.
You're in the final stretch. And you've been magnificient through it. Then you can do something else and enjoy some other creative setting? Like, I don't know, [Random suggestion off the top of my head] a Slice of Life story in a Post Scarcity civilisation and away from all this darkness? [/Random suggestion off the top of my head]
 
Despite the level of decomposition, the attending Medical Officer, Major Ana de Armas, judged that the cause of death was a bullet wound, likely from a rifle, from extremely close range, up through the jaw and into his brain.
Not the Cuban actress of the same name, I'm assuming?
 
Last edited:
Article:
BURLINGTON, VERMONT

[Snow has begun falling.]
Off-topic, but do kids these days know what Touhou is?

They always do this - they invent these groups that are mythically criticising them from some position even more out-there than their own, so they can ignore the legitimate criticisms they were receiving.
To be fair, I would bet my rifle against a half-empty water bottle that some people did criticize the Junta from those absurd positions. Not many, but you only need one for the Wackadoodle's statement to legally not be a lie.

The rest of this is just, as referenced, the Junta's excuseology for why the parties haven't split again, why the military is still privileged over everyone else, why most everyone is either in or controlled by the army and so on - it's because otherwise, Zack's gonna climb out of the lake and getcha! Scary!
These days, the Great Lakes area probably has the most outbreaks in North America. We're far enough north to catch some wandering down from northern Canada (sparsely populated even before "Z-Day"), there are still infected lingering in Rust Belt ruins that nobody bothered to clear because it's just Gary or whatever (and the scrap is more dangerous than the infected anyhow), and the Great Lakes are basically an ocean with no abyssal plain for them to get lost in.

You know what this amounts to? Every spring, we get a few news stories about an unexpected "ghoul-killer" or a tragically preventable death. A couple years ago, a homestead out by Thunder Bay got attacked when everyone was asleep, and that ballooned into a major outbreak that killed about 30 people, including the ones caught by quarantine once locals realized what was going on and organized a hunt.

Say what you will about the Junta's shit priorities and worse plans; they smashed the infected mobs. Outside the ocean and maybe Iceland, you'll get struck by lightning before you find more than a handful of infected in one place. Barring a multi-coincidence pileup like what happened in Thunder Bay, small numbers of infected aren't dangerous to lone survivors, let alone communities. You don't need an army or a state of total war to handle that.

There's this idea people have - a peculiarly persuasive one, and one that's very popular under the Junta - that cynicism somehow makes more "sense" than anything else. That cynics have some inherent bonus to states they run, to their ability to organise things.

The Holy Russian Empire hardly believed a word of the theology they spouted, they just flailed desperately for whatsoever they could find to prop up their state, and they were put down like dogs by a bunch of bright eyed idealists flying the red flag.
Children are taught that the world is bright and shiny, that any flaws it has are minor and transient. They are taught optimism.
As adolescents, they realize this is not the case; many assume that everything they were taught was a lie. They discover pessimism.
Too few come to realize that their adolescent assumptions are as untrue as their childish lessons.

Article:
I'm addicted to murder, and that's about the nicest way I can put it. You might say that's not technically true, that since they're already dead I'm not really killing. Horseshit; it's murder, and it's a rush like nothing else.
I'll give Collins this: Not many people think the infected deserve the same dignity as any human being. That just because they're sick doesn't mean they lose their moral value.

Guess I shouldn't be surprised that it's a rare point of view. Necessary as it is, putting down the infected would be a lot easier if I thought of them as brainless zombies. Or if I was "addicted to murder".

I suppose the hangup is specifically about hearkening back to the "greatest generation" who "built" the American middle class, but I mean, the thing that built the American middle class was inheriting rule over most of the world because they effectively owned the previous hegemon outright.

This sort of nostalgia is always just nostalgia for when America was on top.
Let's not forget the contributions of the American lower class. Eternally implied by the existence of a "middle class," but left out of American nostalgia almost entirely, because acknowledging their existence would complicate the narrative.



Article:
[Gently, she pats her womb.]

I don't know how many clinics like this there are throughout the Rodina. Not enough, I'm sure. So few of us, young, fertile women who didn't succumb to drugs, or AIDS, or the stink of the living dead. Our leader says that the greatest weapon a Russian woman can wield now is her uterus. If that means not knowing my children's fathers, or…
Retch.

I could expand on that, but I suspect anyone still reading this commie take on WWZ is at least vaguely aware what kind of rhetoric this reminds me of.

At least Brooks had the self-awareness to put this dreck in an ambiguously sinister part of the world and not the parts we're supposed to uncritically approve of. But still, retch.
Especially since he put these words of praise in the mouths of that system's victims. Or at least, the only victim we get to hear from.

Article:
Your mission is to tell your world of ours, to make them see what will happen if anyone ever tries to f**k with us. The war drove us back to our roots, made us remember what it means to be Russian. We are strong again, we are feared again, and to Russians, that only means one thing, we are finally safe again! For the first time in almost a hundred years, we can finally warm ourselves in the protective fist of a Caesar, and I'm sure you know the word for Caesar in Russian.
Is that what this whole segment was building to? "The Russians are still dangerous, even after the end of the world"?
Is that why Brooks added the breeding camps? So the Russians would have a population boom that makes them more threatening to America??

Article:
I tried to fit in, settle down, make some friends, get a job and do my part to help put America back together. But not only was I dead, I couldn't think about anything else but killing. I'd start to study people's necks, their heads. I'd think, "Hmmmm, that dude's probably got a thick frontal lobe, I gotta go in through the eye socket." Or "hard blow to the occipital'd drop that chick pretty fast." It was when the new prez, "the Whacko"—Jesus, who the hell am I to call anybody else that?—when I heard him speak at a rally, I must have thought of at least fifty ways to bring him down.


I mean, this is just normal adjustment to not being in combat any more?
Is it?

Okay, if you broke the text into pieces and analyzed the symptoms in isolation, it would probably look about right. But the way Brooks is having this character describe himself, "I'm addicted to murder" and all, makes him sound less like a traumatized war veteran adjusting badly to civilian life than a supervillain your B-movie Batman knockoff needs to overcome.

Article:
I once met an ex-Iranian pilot who was traveling through Canada looking for a place to settle down. He said that Americans are the only people he's ever met who just can't accept that bad things can happen to good people.


Planning to start a study into whether Major Ahmed Farahnakian is the best and most convincing sarcastic in the world, or whether Americans are just uniquely credulous.
Article:
TROY, MONTANA, USA

[Mrs. Miller and I stand on the back deck, above the children playing in the central courtyard.]


You can blame the politicians, the businessmen, the generals, the "machine," but really, if you're looking to blame someone, blame me. I'm the American system, I'm the machine. That's the price of living in a democracy; we all gotta take the rap.


This is such a bold start though, I have to say. She just outright says that this was her fault, not the fault of the Government or the military - its the same shit they prodded Jesika into saying - this isn't the fault of the government, they didn't fuck over their population, it was really everyone's fault, and everyone bears collective responsibility for it.
American culture has a weird relationship with "the average American".
On one hand, average Americana is an ideal to be preserved and protected; a politician adopts the imagery of an ordinary American to see relatable and trustworthy.
On the other hand, average individuals are worthy of derision and blame. (See "Homer's Enemy" for a classic example.) Average Americans are fat and lazy and stupid, morally impure. Even the trailer trash is decadent.

I'd say this complicated relationship with the "average American" comes from America's proud democratic values. The average American is powerful; he and the millions like him vote and purchase to direct the mightiest country on Earth. But at the same time, America as a society makes a bunch of very bad decisions. If we attribute those to the American people and not the politicians and businessmen who directly made the decisions, the average American is demonstrably an imperialist racist short-sighted POS.
 
All OOC:

American culture has a weird relationship with "the average American".
On one hand, average Americana is an ideal to be preserved and protected; a politician adopts the imagery of an ordinary American to see relatable and trustworthy.
On the other hand, average individuals are worthy of derision and blame. (See "Homer's Enemy" for a classic example.) Average Americans are fat and lazy and stupid, morally impure. Even the trailer trash is decadent.

I'd say this complicated relationship with the "average American" comes from America's proud democratic values. The average American is powerful; he and the millions like him vote and purchase to direct the mightiest country on Earth. But at the same time, America as a society makes a bunch of very bad decisions. If we attribute those to the American people and not the politicians and businessmen who directly made the decisions, the average American is demonstrably an imperialist racist short-sighted POS

Said it before I could. The idea of collective American responsibility is noble and if Brooks had written it better, would really have worked-because he's not really talking about Zombies here.

He's talking about the GWOT. He's talking-or trying to-about America's collective choice to start two doomed wars, one out of vengeance that could've been won if the second one hadn't started out of any number of things (I think spite, personally) that killed thousands of innocent people and almost destabilized a whole region of the world permanently. That was America's fault, because we let it happen and encouraged our leaders, who we elected, to do it.

IDK, just my 2c as a military kid who grew up shaped by that war.
 
[He motions to what looks like a sharpened steel paddle at his side.]

"Pouwhenua"—got it from a Maori brother who used to play for the All Blacks before the war. Bad motherfuckers, the Maori. That battle at One Tree Hill, five hundred of them versus half of reanimated Auckland. The pouwhenua's a tough weapon to use, even if this one's steel instead of wood.
... I would not describe a pouwhenua as looking like a paddle, though at least he gets them usually being wood correct.
 
They have the attitude towards this that every adults strives for, but cannot reach - acceptance. Pure and unfettered; there are ghouls, but they are just part of life, like trucks on the road, or deep ponds, fast rivers. Something to be aware of, something to avoid, but not something to keep you up at night. Not something so alien and absurd, but so undeniably real that the fear of it can never leave.

It helps, actually! Grounds you in the knowledge that the world will continue. We will continue.

People ask me why I'm still religious.

And sure, if you see me, it's a weird kind of religion. The girl in the corner of the bar who drinks like a fish and has a huge tattoo of Santa Muerte across her back and a necklace with fifteen crucifixes - her share of the spoils. They ask why I moved to "Aztlan" and became a Catholic.

It's because even though I felt like one of the living dead myself at the time, even though I've witnessed the suffering and death of countless people, the times I felt I had purpose was when I could treat someone with a little bit of dignity in death, to make them feel cared for after they were gone.

You should see the shrines they're building in "Aztlan", the vast halls of bones of war-dead, ghoul or otherwise, meticulously cleaned and sorted and stacked, dressed with icons, with the light of candles and the aroma of incense. You understand then, seeing it, that while we can never undo the War, we can do our duty to the dead. Death will never have a purpose, but it can be holy.

And I was put on this earth to clean up bodies.
 
Last edited:
At this point I'm mostly in this for the fascinating if slightly bizarre insight into the biases of Brooks. Because I have to admit I went '...what?' with the shot at Clement Atlee. He was a one term Prime Minister and Churchill was both before and after, but the dude got shit done. He presided over the post-war recovery, founded the NHS, and laid the foundations for much of the modern British welfare state. Even the fascists don't want to get rid of half of what he built, because it was that successful. If you have a list of greatest ever Prime Ministers, he's going to be in the Top Five somewhere.

Absolutely fucking baffling take. But given what else we've seen from Brooks with his militarist dick-sucking, Great Man bullshit, and Hard Men Make Hard Decisions (while hard) it's not surprising the exaggerated myth of Churchill's greatness is hilt-deep down his throat.
 
Last edited:
Article:
BURLINGTON, VERMONT [Snow has begun falling. Reluctantly, "the Whacko" turns back for the house.] You ever heard of Clement Attlee? Of course not, why should you? Man was a loser, a third-rate mediocrity who only slipped into the history books because he unseated Winston Churchill before World War II officially ended.


America's last civilian president is up first, and like… immediately he makes me really, really mad.

What a coincidence; me too.

Others have already said it better than I could, but personally I don't think Atlee gets enough credit for creating the NHS, an explicitly socialist institution so successful that, despite the best efforts of reactionaries, it continues chugging along and providing a better standard of healthcare for the British public.
 
Said it before I could. The idea of collective American responsibility is noble and if Brooks had written it better, would really have worked-because he's not really talking about Zombies here.

He's talking about the GWOT. He's talking-or trying to-about America's collective choice to start two doomed wars, one out of vengeance that could've been won if the second one hadn't started out of any number of things (I think spite, personally) that killed thousands of innocent people and almost destabilized a whole region of the world permanently. That was America's fault, because we let it happen and encouraged our leaders, who we elected, to do it.

IDK, just my 2c as a military kid who grew up shaped by that war.
I do feel like the fellas in the government and military who actively lied to the American public about key facts (like whether their targets had WMDs that they were planning to use) deserve a larger share of the blame than the average voter. I don't wanna say there wasn't a lot of racism and Islamophobia and jingoism fueling the American public's support for the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars, but there were also lies in the mix, which supported both all three and a desire to direct them at specific targets.


... I would not describe a pouwhenua as looking like a paddle, though at least he gets them usually being wood correct.
On one hand, looking at images of pouwhenua online, I can see why Brooks would describe them as looking like paddles. Some of them, at least, are long and thin with flat parts at one end.

On the other hand, when I read the pouwhenua description, I imagined something between "ping-pong paddle" and "that's a paddlin'". Especially since any polearm made primarily of metal (as opposed to a light haft and a metal head) would be pretty impractical.


At this point I'm mostly in this for the fascinating if slightly bizarre insight into the biases of Brooks. Because I have to admit I went '...what?' with the shot at Clement Atlee. He was a one term Prime Minister and Churchill was both before and after, but the dude got shit done. He presided over the post-war recovery, founded the NHS, and laid the foundations for much of the modern British welfare state. Even the fascists don't want to get rid of half of what he built, because it was that successful. If you have a list of greatest ever Prime Ministers, he's going to be in the Top Five somewhere.

Absolutely fucking baffling take. But given what else we've seen from Brooks with his militarist dick-sucking, Great Man bullshit, and Hard Men Make Hard Decisions (while hard) it's not surprising the exaggerated myth of Churchill's greatness is hilt-deep down his throat.
I'm going to guess that Brooks being an American also plays a big part.

When I hear Brits talking about the NHS, it's mostly positive. There are exceptions, but they're mostly proud of having one of the best healthcare systems in the world. Or at least, one that is specifically better than the USA's. (Low bar, aim higher next time.)

When I hear Americans talking about the NHS, it's mostly negative. They vaguely allude to the exceptions, imply they're the norm, and explain that that's why public medicine can never work. Same deal with the "Welfare State," though the UK usually isn't the target. (Usually they're talking about how Scandinavian countries can only get that stuff to work because they're unusually homogeneous, as though economic policy works differently for different races.)

Plus, Winston Churchill is...basically the only historical Prime Minister the median American can name off the top of their head. Atlee might deserve to be considered among the top 5 British PMs, but an American's list of greatest PMs would probably be Winston Churchill followed by four contemporary politicians, some of whom have never been Prime Minister, and possibly including Justin Trudeau.
 
On the third of December, 2033, T. Sean Collins was found in a bodybag in the walk-in fridge in the Impisi Company's base in Oranjemund when it was overrun. Despite the level of decomposition, the attending Medical Officer, Major Ana de Armas, judged that the cause of death was a bullet wound, likely from a rifle, from extremely close range, up thr
ough the jaw and into his brain. Time of death was broadly congruent with their orders to move further into Namibia and liquidate civilian resistance.

For what little credit the man deserves - and do remember, he was an indicted war criminal - when he was given an unambiguous order to go out and commit massacres, he did, actually, choose death first.

Collins is a fascinating figure, not remotely 'important' except to the people he hurt, but deeply tragic. I use the term in the classical sense, not to indicate any particular sympathies or anything. But he was clearly a good bit more self-aware and thoughtful than he liked to let on most of the time and he had, ironically, a rare capacity for empathy. Deeply twisted in more than one way but it was real. What else could he do when he looked back at the decisions he'd made and the acts he'd committed but drink himself into oblivion and insist that he had some kind of 'addiction' to murder? I wish he'd have found a way to come clean about everything and faced the music rather than putting a bullet through his brain, sure, if to help make the case against his compatriots and to help survivors by improving the historical record. (Hell I wish we lived in a better world that had cultivated the best parts of this man because I can almost convince myself he could have been a passionate comrade.) But, clearly, the buried part of him that still demanded he care about others and take responsibility won out in the end. The credit he deserves is little, as you say, but it's not zero.

Article:
Last week I was listening to the radio and just happened to hear [name withheld for legal reasons]. He was doing his usual thing—fart jokes and insults and adolescent sexuality—and I remember thinking, "This man survived and my parents didn't." No, I try not to be bitter.




I get this. I look at some of the people who survived and I just feel this terrible, unfair anger and resentment in my chest, because my family didn't. She's not wrong.



But it isn't healthy - it isn't the fault of some radio shockjock that her parents died, and dwelling on the unfairness is just going to hurt, just going to retraumatise her.



Everyone alive still has scars from this war, and they're never going away.

I don't think the Junta is smart or competent enough to do it deliberately, but it definitely doesn't hurt them to allow that sort of bitterness to persist. Look at Jesika's implicit way of seeing the world here; she never mentions that the government's choices played a huge part in the fates of these people. It's ascribed to an inchoate world that has no fairness. The anger that should be directed at the Junta and its enabling civilian predecessors instead has nowhere to go, so it gets redirected towards bitterness towards other regular people. Sure, said shock jock is a celebrity and all, but he's not exactly in the halls of power or anything. You have to ask yourself how many regular folks in America look at their neighbors with this sort of resentment because "Why did her sister live and mine didn't?" "Why did her son survive while both mine died?" and that sabotages possibilities for solidarity at a very base level, maybe too base to be easily identified let alone tackled, given not many people will actually go out in public and talk about such resentments.
 
Back
Top