We would have to deal with said penalties regardless, as the mill is a two-stage project, with the first stage stated to be primarily preparing the ground, with the second being construction of the mill itself. There's no point in trying to avoid winter turns, we're forced to deal with it anyway.[X] Plan: Doing our job and Vodka
Since I guess people don't want to finish the first part of the mill before winter to avoid any malus related to construction work in heavy snow, I will vote for the option I have fewer objections to.
We would have to deal with said penalties regardless, as the mill is a two-stage project, with the first stage stated to be primarily preparing the ground, with the second being construction of the mill itself. There's no point in trying to avoid winter turns, we're forced to deal with it anyway.
A distillery would be difficult because I don't think we can casually put together the distilling apparatus without importing a few things, difficult during the winter, not to mention we'd need a building for it and all buildings are currently occupied (which would then come up against the same problem as the mill).We could do indoor actions such as building vodka stills in the interim.
Regardless it might not be an issue, hence I am voting for the other plan.
@Rockeye I've been thinking on this line for days and all I can think about is a giant industrial complex powered by a single water mill. How likely is that to happen?"Moving air with water... Harold, d'you think you could hook that up to a bellows somehow?"
There's fundamental issues limiting the size of water driven machinery, namely how much power you can feasibly extract from the river before it's dropped too far down to continue its course as a river. This limit can be pretty high for a large enough river and an industrial complex drawn out along the riverbank, but large rivers tend to be used for trade, making it hard to fully exploit them without people getting mad at you. There's a reason factories took off after steam and electricity: (char)coal is a lot denser of a power source than water is, and much easier to transfer around in a useful state.I've been thinking on this line for days and all I can think about is a giant industrial complex powered by a single water mill. How likely is that to happen?
This. 90% of the time somebody doing a mass tagging in a thread is utterly wrong, is convinced they're right, had been spamming the thread about their thing for a few pages so nobody would have missed it anyway, and has immediately generated an incentive to vote for something else just to show them how annoying they are.It's hard to put a reason on the nigh-instinctive aversion and flash of anger that mass-tagging inspires. It's similar to the @everyone power on Discord - use with lots of caution, it at all. Getting mentioned for something that's not specifically about you, a question for you, but instead is "hey vote for MY idea!" is Very Annoying. It doesn't really invite discussion since it's the equivalent of shouting to a crowd. It's also very easy to start mass-tagging for lesser and lesser reasons, and it just all balls up into a big ball of "neeeeh".
Also, because I said so.
Not at all. Even if we lived next to the in-universe equivalent of Niagara Falls (and had money to burn on really high quality infrastructure that could make use if it) so power itself wouldn't be an issue, running something that could be called an industrial complex rather than a facility off of a single power source more or less requires electricity. This is because without electrical power being easily transferable from point to point running multiple tools/operations off of a single source is an extremely complex engineering challenge.@Rockeye I've been thinking on this line for days and all I can think about is a giant industrial complex powered by a single water mill. How likely is that to happen?
Not at all. Even if we lived next to the in-universe equivalent of Niagara Falls (and had money to burn on really high quality infrastructure that could make use if it) so power itself wouldn't be an issue, running something that could be called an industrial complex rather than a facility off of a single power source more or less requires electricity. This is because without electrical power being easily transferable from point to point running multiple tools/operations off of a single source is an extremely complex engineering challenge.
You'd need either a very fancy gearing system and something like rollers/hydraulics to use plug-and-play with industrial machinery, a tree-trunk sized piece of tool steel that could handle the torque of turning gears at both middling parts (where gearing for a normal mill would be) as well as farther parts (like a building or two next door) without snapping from the stress, or some kind of Rube Goldberg style of each machine being powered by the motion of the previous machine. That last one is the most plausible, but the hilarious inefficiency that'd be involved as well as the necessity of running all of the machines higher in the daisy chain at once in order to work stuff lower down makes the concept highly impractical.
There's fundamental issues limiting the size of water driven machinery, namely how much power you can feasibly extract from the river before it's dropped too far down to continue its course as a river. This limit can be pretty high for a large enough river and an industrial complex drawn out along the riverbank, but large rivers tend to be used for trade, making it hard to fully exploit them without people getting mad at you. There's a reason factories took off after steam and electricity: (char)coal is a lot denser of a power source than water is, and much easier to transfer around in a useful state.
We could set up additional mills, but that's not what was asked - running multiple things off of a single waterwheel is incredibly difficult. There is a very big difference between a gearing system that can power a horizontal grindstone (as was discussed during the demo as a possible future option) and a gearing system that can switch between powering multiple different things.AS I reacll there were two other sites that are possible locations for watermills (though not as effective as the one we chose). So I think we should be able to slowly build something up.
Also, historically the solution used was the first one of a grearing system, so it shouldn't be impossible to add additional things, but it will be additional effort for another time.
A mill powered bellows is likely possible with their current capabilities as it is slow and steady like the current mill. However, a lathe probably needs far better machining and gearing to work as it needs to go quite a bit faster to be worth anything.Your point is clear and to the point. What I should have said is we are building the water mill for the express purpose of grinding grains. Timothy is now asking if it could power a bellows, and I could easily see a carpenter asking after if the mill could power a lathe. From there more and more people and professions could ask what the mill could do for them. The end result of all this being the mill in the center on an industrial complex powering a small portion of it.