i mean
Gonna take this as a no since it went unaddressed, so this question now becomes, is this role actually good or bad? Its role color suggests non-Town if we go by traditional colors along with the Town-colored basic vanilla text from the beginning of the game, but those things alone don't really tell us anything since we have no reason to believe them.
Because I didn't expect anyone to be eliminated at the time because no one was making any pushes, and I don't think that would be helpful information anyway?
you dont expect anyone to be eliminated today?
boooo, you're no fun
Not before Nani decided to be a cult leader, anyway. This game is weird and I want to see what a no yeet does.
...
Uh...so just to make sure I'm following, you're suggesting that Nani - who is actually a cult leader and has been since before the Neighborizer reveal - fake-revealed as a Neighborizer as cover for the cult (in case I guess there's some sort of weird "check who's in a private chat with who" power floating around???) and then subsequently truthfully revealed as a cult leader. Yes?
I don't follow. Identify the contradiction(s)?
???
felt like it was pretty straightforward
Because people would pose this exact question when such an insinuation is made. The way I see it, you doing this actually gives Cyri's theory more credence. After all, we still don't know if these reveals can be trusted or distrusted across the board yet -- same with the cop checks that have gone around.
I mean, if we wanna test that, I could always reveal as dayvig and shoot Cyri.
This is true, though. Not worth wining about, unless we want to actually pursue the theory.
Evidently. Equally evidently I did not. Would you please elaborate.
No??? You can't just make any evidence fit any theory by waving a hand and saying "wine." My take isn't "this means Nani definitely isn't a cult leader," to which that would be a fair response; it's "this does not in any way change my assessment of how likely Nani is to be a cult leader," which is already the wine-conscious approach. If you want to claim that the likelihood of Nani truthfully having been a cult leader all along is in fact increased by Nani having voluntarily revealed as a cult leader, you're gonna need an actual justification for why that would happen.
Could have just said this in the first place then, as your response to Cyri reads very heavily as a complete dismissal of the idea.
lol = laughing out loud
*anymore for today
I'd sooner guess role cop would just give you the name of the given role, which probably isn't a good call to take over due to the nature of everything right now. Would definitely say fullcop is the most useful of the three presented
I can guarantee you that is not it.
Eh, fair enough, I can see how that would be the read. But nah, intention was always just "in what way does this actually constitute useful new evidence."
Okay yeah that much I agree was evident. I more meant "why is it inherently a ridiculous proposition that nobody would be eliminated today," seeing as there's already been seemingly serious discussion of that very possibility by a number of people.
