Remove ads

Hugh's Perfectly Abnormal Mafia Game Where Everything Weird Happens Oh God (And We Promise It's Not Mountainous This Time)

Reader mode
All yall revealing roles and stuff.

Meanwhile playing with a very specific set of self imposed rules to keep insanity rolling
 
Scorbunny said:
i know what i can do bc i was specific enough to know what i do
if you dont know what ur role actually does thats on u
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I guess at that point my question becomes, did anybody actually have anything contained in their role card to suggest anything beyond basically a vanilla rolecard? I don't think it's crazy to pose such a question at this point since apparently, some people are working with a lot more info than others.

That is to say, is there any proof that there is a role card that isn't Perfectly Abnormal Townie?
 
Pretty simple. I put rules on myself for my actions to always follow and so far I haven't hit a wall.
For instance my actions have had the same modifier to them. I have done two vastly different ones. Basically I playing crazy aces on creativity to not limit what I feasibly can do.
 
Cyricubed said:
Pretty simple. I put rules on myself for my actions to always follow and so far I haven't hit a wall.
For instance my actions have had the same modifier to them. I have done two vastly different ones. Basically I playing crazy aces on creativity to not limit what I feasibly can do.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
…A part of me…
Oh.
Hunh. Tch.
Thought for a second you always put self-imposed rules on your dialogues or something rediculously cool if you work under those restrictions all the time or something…
 
Wiadi said:
I mean yeah but we have like two? Three? Claimed daycops of some sort or another and zero claimed night cops so.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I can explain this!
This is because (at least in my case), I submitted an action during the day, intending for it to be a placeholder.
This was taken as a day submission (reasonably) and thus I got locked into the day version of my role.
My intention was night.
 
Zaealix said:
Thought for a second you always put self-imposed rules on your dialogues or something rediculously cool if you work under those restrictions all the time or something…
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

god I remember not being able to do specific things as a superdoc in Worm...that was so painful.

Right so we also have the reveal of 'Nani Cult Leader'

In essense: Nanithefuq
 
Cyricubed said:
god I remember not being able to do specific things as a superdoc in Worm...that was so painful.

Right so we also have the reveal of 'Nani Cult Leader'

In essense: Nanithefuq
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
tbf it let me figure you out by the end of the day so I do appreciate it. <3

And the question is if we go for no yeet, yeet IH/Hugh (which he preffered as a potentially better no yeet equiv), or do we go for Nani with the cult leader shift.
 
Personally I favor following IH's suggestion - it doesn't seem to lose us anything over noyeet AFAICT, and given the precedent established with YP I'm skeptical that Nani is actually a cult leader. We should have an unknown distribution of our investigatives check Nani to be sure, so they can't just cult the one responsible for verifying their status; while that's still not foolproof, it's enough for me to be comfortable pushing off that issue for the next Day.
 
Pawn Lelouch said:
tbf it let me figure you out by the end of the day so I do appreciate it. <3

And the question is if we go for no yeet, yeet IH/Hugh (which he preffered as a potentially better no yeet equiv), or do we go for Nani with the cult leader shift.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

I would like @Draxy 's opinion on the matter first if at all possible?
 
Cyricubed said:
I would like @Draxy 's opinion on the matter first if at all possible?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Honestly have no idea what is going on anymore. This is pretty much my first serious bastard game, so everything is still novel. (Last one does not count, mountainous is a bastard thing to do, but it is not bastard)

Like with what Pyro did before there's precedent with town being able to take scum roles and still flip good (provided flips are genuine of course) so not sure we should be voting Nani purely on that at this point, even if it is still sus of them for doing so, if only so we can avoid a repeat of yesterday with all the focus centring onto one person and no actual scum hunting occurring, though at the same time we can't really risk it in case the role actually does perform as advertised. In short, these weird flips are just a distraction from actual scum hunting at this point.

So please no one else reveal as scum, it was funny once but not really anymore and just to cut this discussion short @Nanimani please change back to a town role, you're making us all nervous with that on the table.

[X] Vote Nanimani

For the other part of the question, not sure how I feel on noyeet, like know it's a thing you shouldn't normally do, but at this point with two nights without kills all town could certainly be possible. So noyeet may be the only way to win this, would feel like a day without progress if that's not the win-con though. Like so far don't think we've really been doing much scum hunting, yesterday was taken up entirely by Pyro being pyro and then today it looks like we're pushing for noyeet.

So question for everyone then, in the case that this game actually isn't all town, what is your top three current scumreads?

Also just noticed it says IH/Hugh in that quote from pawn, didn't we do that d1? How is that on the table now?
 
Draxy said:
Also just noticed it says IH/Hugh in that quote from pawn, didn't we do that d1? How is that on the table now?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
shrugs

Honestly, I'm rolling with what IH was saying in deadchat, where he seems to think its a viable and better alternative to no yeeting.
 
Ugh, weirdly enough I'm more for aiming at Nani atm but I'm uncertain as voting a dead person seems...counter productive than voting a noyeet weirdly enough.


With the cult leader reveal at mention I think I also want to revisit listing the neighborhood participants. Especially afterall if a neighborhood is just a fancy word for cult.
 
Everytime i look at this thread my eyes fucking glaze over - I'm actually genuinely sorry I'm not more active but i genuinely just am not really getting it.
 
Cyricubed said:
Ugh, weirdly enough I'm more for aiming at Nani atm but I'm uncertain as voting a dead person seems...counter productive than voting a noyeet weirdly enough.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Explain? I figure either it functions the same as a noyeet (i.e. "that is not a valid elimination so nobody gets eliminated"), it gets treated as a null vote (in which case it'd resolve to the second-place result, so probably just make sure that's also no elim if we go with this plan), or it does something weird and interesting (which is the best-case scenario & the reason we'd bother trying this at all).
Cyricubed said:
With the cult leader reveal at mention I think I also want to revisit listing the neighborhood participants. Especially afterall if a neighborhood is just a fancy word for cult.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Uh...what? I'm not seeing the connection you're drawing here. Are you arguing that you think the cult leader reveal is genuine and therefore the members of the neighborhood should be assumed compromised?
 
Wiadi said:
Uh...what? I'm not seeing the connection you're drawing here. Are you arguing that you think the cult leader reveal is genuine and therefore the members of the neighborhood should be assumed compromised?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Agree'd or to the extent that the neighborhood doens't actually exist and it is just simply a cover for a cult?

Wiadi said:
Explain? I figure either it functions the same as a noyeet (i.e. "that is not a valid elimination so nobody gets eliminated"), it gets treated as a null vote (in which case it'd resolve to the second-place result, so probably just make sure that's also no elim if we go with this plan), or it does something weird and interesting (which is the best-case scenario & the reason we'd bother trying this at all).
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Unless that best-case scenario is something unfavorable in general then I reiterate it feels contradictory.
 
Reader mode
You must login or register to reply here.
Remove ads
Back
Top