Jack Hansan
Well, that happend.
- Location
- Inverness, Scotland
I prefer Harriers or Typhoons.Actually, yes. F-35s would be ideal for SEAD in this case, as they'd be able to come into range and unleash their payload without fear of detection.
I prefer Harriers or Typhoons.Actually, yes. F-35s would be ideal for SEAD in this case, as they'd be able to come into range and unleash their payload without fear of detection.
I just don't like how expensive and...delayed the F-35 is. I'd rather fly a Buccaneer than a F-35. For real.You don't prefer Harriers. Deployability is the only thing the Harrier has in its favor.
At least I got shot down by a jet that isn't delayed and almost/is over budget right now.
At least I got shot down by a jet that isn't delayed and almost/is over budget right now.
*shrugs* I just don't see what's so special about it apart from the "stealth". F-16 is a pretty good plane though.When you could be laughing maniacally and shooting them all down from your fancy F-35 Augmented reality interface...
Careful with that edge, you'll hurt someone.
Typhoons I can see, but harriers versus the F-35 as a carrier plane? Seriously?
*shrugs* I just don't see what's so special about it apart from the "stealth".
I still don't like F-35. Seriously, $112 million per unit.STOL capabilites? Advanced avionics? Supercruise(in a fashion)?
F-16 is almost at the end of it's development cycle with CAPES. F-35 provides a much newer airframe with increased compatibility and power generation for future avionics fits that the F-16 simply cannot take.
In the middle of all that, this pops up:
Lemme tell you about shit I don't want to see as I'm already worrying about whether my missile inventories will last or if I'm going to have to start throwing airframes into their teeth...
And I haven't even touched Greece itself yet.
as they'd be able to come into range and unleash their payload without fear of detection.