Jig, I love her.Claudette sighs. "Fine. You obstinate ass. In that case," she says, "I'll just have to settle for becoming a widow
Well technically speaking, von Trotha did exactly what the description of him said he does: he launched a major bombardment to soften us up, then committed.Huh. That is unexpected, Trotha actually attempted to shatter the centre. I overestimated his defensiveness, he is certainly willing to risk things on a decisive attack.
I'm still going through the combat logs, though in defense of any plan here: Nobody of us had a combined long-range infantry and cavalry assault in mind. Though that would also mean we can try and kill one of his artillery positions with the 55th via Sarnscheid, which is fun. I think there is room for an encirclement of most of his battery here.Well technically speaking, von Trotha did exactly what the description of him said he does: he launched a major bombardment to soften us up, then committed.
It's just that said major bombardment happened on the same turn he committed.
Still, I think we should take this as a lesson. Like, I am kind of seething since I was reassured that we don't have to worry about our artillery being threatened only for this to happen.
>200th Hob Morale Check (adjacent ally Routed): 11+6+3=20; no effect
>251st Hob Morale Check (adjacent ally Routed): 20+6-8+3=21; no effect
>200th Hob Morale Check (Under melee attack): 12+6+3=21; no effect
>19th Half Pfd Morale Check (Ambushed): 20, 8+5-7+3=9; takes 5 Stress!
>19th Half Pfd Morale Check (Charged): 14, 2+5-12+3=0, ROUTED!
>28th Half Pfd Morale Check (Charged): 20, 12, 7+5+3=15; takes 2 Stress!
>28th Half Pfd Morale Check (Flanked): 20, 10, 6+5-2+3=12; takes 4 Stress!
>28th Half Pfd Morale Check (Under melee attack): 20, 12, 2+5-14+3=0, ROUTED!
Yeah, I get that, this turn could have gone really bad if we lacked units in the center. For lessons, I already mentioned two above, but longer term we want to get more infantry, and probably interpret how enemy commander will act less strictly. And with the change to ambush rules, have better scouting so we can reveal ambushes and also be better aware of the possibility of an attack.Still, I think we should take this as a lesson. Like, I am kind of seething since I was reassured that we don't have to worry about our artillery being threatened only for this to happen.
So, Trotha probably has no more units in Rotholz on account of the units being accounted for (33rd Dwa still routed). But straight up charging the artillery is a bad idea, both of the remaining hussars have ready actions which are designed for interception (charge, melee, move in all likelyhood). Still, using their charge to take out the 9th Elv Hsr has been proposed before and is a decent enough idea.How is our far right flank? Do we think Von Trotha has more units there? Because if not, the 341st Elven Hussars seem to be in a good position to outflank most of Von Trotha's units on our right flank and hit the enemy artillery. They must first move through Rotholz forest but I think it could be done. Do routed units provide spotting information? Also, how many hexes can cavalry move in a forest tile?
I don't know, the enemy cavalry charge on our 10th Hum Artillery seems pretty devastating, and I don't think Von Trotha has very many units guarding his artillery. However, we definitely should try to take out the 9th Elv Hsr next turn like you propose. That will give us options to either wheel around the enemy's flanks and hit the enemy units in the center of the map or turn and threaten Von Trotha's artillery.So, Trotha probably has no more units in Rotholz on account of the units being accounted for (33rd Dwa still routed). But straight up charging the artillery is a bad idea, both of the remaining hussars have ready actions which are designed for interception (charge, melee, move in all likelyhood). Still, using their charge to take out the 9th Elv Hsr has been proposed before and is a decent enough idea.
Routing the 9th is guarantueed, we would have ambush, 2 charges, potential flank attack, causulties and so on. The trickier part is calculating what exactly happens with the 350th, I would assume they would be meleed and charged due to Trotha loosing LoS (1 disadv. check, 1 normal, virtually no causulties). Chances of a rout there vary, but are only 1 in 3. This becomes much less problematic on the following turn due to gaining momentum (+2 from routed nymphs, +1 from 20th Dwa, +1 from Hsr, +1 from routing the 9th Elv Hsr). The only sticking point is the 15th Dwa, which might actually need to be charged to prevent them from doing their own charge on them. This charge is luck dependant, but also allows us to fall into Trotha's back and overwhelm him with center cavalry on the following turn, just by keeping the other ones occupied.What would the math look like for Guillory hitting both hussars, one charge each? It'd be nice to be able to tie down all of his cavalry to prevent any surprises but if we don't rout at least one of them right away we might end up losing the engagement overall.
and now:That was intentional, since I am paranoid about his Horse artillery firing on them from the Sanrcheid hills. They are still useful since they support the West flank.
And also:You note that the enemy horse artillery reveals itself for this mass barrage, appearing out from behind the reverse slope of the hills south of the Sarnscheid castle. Its precise volley cuts right through the ranks of the Lancers. But that is not all.
And what ended up happening:But worst of all, we still do not know where one Unit of his infantry, two units of his cavalry and his horse artillery is. Most likely at least some of those units are on the Western flank, which makes his Western push a much larger threat than it may seem. Especially if his cavalry is there, we do actually run the risk of being flanked
So, turns out keeping the Hobs in the center was absolutely the correct decision. With no Hobs in the middle, his cavalry and infantry could have struck our artillery with impunity.Out of the thick cover of the Räuberholz emerge two hosts of enemy cavalry, with the royalist lancers easily recognizable with their despicable banners
I think this plan looks okay; it seems to deal with most of our immediate problems. The only thing that I'm worried about is Guillory's hussars. Unless we roll badly, they should be able to break the 9th Elven Hussars, but I fear that they would be in a position where Von Trotha could perform a crossfire with his artillery, but IDK. Any thoughts?Draft Plan Hussars Delenda Est, Rotholz Push
-[] Infantry
-[] 200th Hob: 3*Melee 20th Dwa [84% for 100+ casualties, 1 check melee, 1 disadv. casulties, 1 rout?; 70% for routing]
-[] 251st Hob: 2*Charge 8th Elv Hsr, Melee [2 morale checks from charge + melee, causulty math more complex]
-[] 16th Half: Fire at Nym Rng [routing guarantueed due to 19 stress], Brace, Ready Fire Medium Range
-[] 72nd Hum: Brace, 2* Fire at 15th Dwa
-[] 148th Hum: 3*Rest
-[] 42nd Elv: 2*Move NW, Ready Fire [close range]
-[] 45th Elv: 3*Charge 15th Dwa [ambush, charge -> 2 morale checks; pins unit down and benefits from momentum next turn]
-[] Cavalry
-[] Guillory's Hussars: Charge 9th Elv Hsr, ideally out of the Rotholz or east of the hill range, prepare for countercharge if feasible
-[] 55th Elv Hsr: Charge 8th Elv Hsr, Move NE of 10th Hum Art, Ready Charge [deliberate move to distract the HM Hsr, allowing us to take out the 9th Elv Hsr while still playing against any follow-up charge]
-[] Artillery
-[] 31st Elv Art: Fire at 31st Dwa, Brace
-[] 84th Elv Art: Fire at 31st Dwa, Brace
-[] 10th Hum Art: Fire at 31st Dwa, Brace
-[] 5th Hob H Art: Fire at 31st Dwa, Move 2E, NE
No, they would be behind the hills. The issue potentially coming up would be a charge in the side by the HM Hussars, though they would likely survive this if we get enough momentum.I think this plan looks okay; it seems to deal with most of our immediate problems. The only thing that I'm worried about is Guillory's hussars. Unless we roll badly, they should be able to break the 9th Elven Hussars, but I fear that they would be in a position where Von Trotha could perform a crossfire with his artillery, but IDK. Any thoughts?
Could we split Guillory's hussars and charge both enemy cavalry units?No, they would be behind the hills. The issue potentially coming up would be a charge in the side by the HM Hussars, though they would likely survive this if we get enough momentum.
Looks ok to me otherwise, but I disagree witv the artillery orders. The 31th is a lonely infantry unit, it is not a immediate threat to us. I would much rather shoot at the 8th, can we do that without hitting the 13th?Draft Plan Hussars Delenda Est, Rotholz Push
-[] Infantry
-[] 200th Hob: 3*Melee 20th Dwa [84% for 100+ casualties, 1 check melee, 1 disadv. casulties, 1 rout?; 70% for routing]
-[] 251st Hob: 2*Charge 8th Elv Hsr, Melee [2 morale checks from charge + melee, causulty math more complex]
-[] 16th Half: Fire at Nym Rng [routing guarantueed due to 19 stress], Brace, Ready Fire Medium Range
-[] 72nd Hum: Brace, 2* Fire at 15th Dwa
-[] 148th Hum: 3*Rest
-[] 42nd Elv: 2*Move NW, Ready Fire [close range]
-[] 45th Elv: 3*Charge 15th Dwa [ambush, charge -> 2 morale checks; pins unit down and benefits from momentum next turn]
-[] Cavalry
-[] Guillory's Hussars: Charge 9th Elv Hsr, ideally out of the Rotholz or east of the hill range, prepare for countercharge if feasible
-[] 55th Elv Hsr: Charge 8th Elv Hsr, Move NE of 10th Hum Art, Ready Charge [deliberate move to distract the HM Hsr, allowing us to take out the 9th Elv Hsr while still playing against any follow-up charge]
-[] Artillery
-[] 31st Elv Art: Fire at 31st Dwa, Brace
-[] 84th Elv Art: Fire at 31st Dwa, Brace
-[] 10th Hum Art: Fire at 31st Dwa, Brace
-[] 5th Hob H Art: Fire at 31st Dwa, Move 2E, NE
-[] HQ: 3* Move, 2 SE
In short, this plan emphasizes a divide and conquer strategy in regards to the enemy cavalry. Rather than taking out the artillery directly, I propose taking out one of the remaining Elven Hussars while also positioning Guillory's cavalry in an excellent position to attack Trotha's battery in the rear. This forces a couple uncomfortable sacrifices like charging with the 45 at +0 morale, or deliberately taking a blow from interception with the 55th, though the role of the elves is largely finished. With the lancers recovering full stress this turn due to optimism, alongside the 108th; weakening his remaining screen should be a priority in my opinion.
The artillery is actually free to deliver a volley on the 31st, setting us up to fully shatter his intact infantry position in the center out of Rotholz.
Shooting the 8th is unnecessary, they will be charged by the 251st, charged by other cavalry, meleed and probably suffer stress damage from routing. Weakening the 31st has a some chance of destroying his infantry position in the center. They barely resist getting routing from being charged by the 251st alone, this is more than enough.Looks ok to me otherwise, but I disagree witv the artillery orders. The 31th is a lonely infantry unit, it is not a immediate threat to us. I would much rather shoot at the 8th, can we do that without hitting the 13th?
Potentially, though this would seriously lower our chance to take out the 9th Elv Hsr. It's also kind of problematic movement wise, since we are trying to hit the resting position of a moving target. I don't really think it's sufficiently viable, better to attempt taking them out at the beginning of next turn, alongside a combined offensive.Could we split Guillory's hussars and charge both enemy cavalry units?