@DragonParadox sorry to bother you, I forgot to tag you with my questions.
- You are indeed in a new scene
- No, BMI is limited to human sized humanoids
@DragonParadox sorry to bother you, I forgot to tag you with my questions.
So, miniaturized version of the being in front of us, identical in all respects except scale? BMI explicitly allows for fictional individuals to be recreated.
So, miniaturized version of the being in front of us, identical in all respects except scale? BMI explicitly allows for fictional individuals to be recreated.
Normally allowed to act against Outsider-aligned forces in her presence based solely on their alignment - she even says as much:
I remember the quote and all of these various points are readily obvious/apparent to me yeah.
We don't know the full scope of terms of said duty, but it involves making sure that Ebon Dragon doesn't wake up. When discharging said duty, she is allowed to do stuff that would normally be prohibited by the Rules,
So she can bend the rules to stop the ED from waking up but wasn't able to do so to kill the guy who we were using the charm on to begin with which was the perceived threat in her eyes? Doesn't make much sense.Not allowed to act against those who call her to prevent Ebon Dragon from waking up. Even if they are Outsider aligned.
She was allowed to act against him, according to your logic.6) Again, based on the above, the angel is not charged with keeping existence of Ebon Dragon, the (rough) location of its tomb, the knowledge of how its magic / charms feel secret. If she was, she would have been allowed to act against Empty Man.
TL;DR: The angel is charged with preventing Ebon Dragon from waking up. She doesn't seem to be charged with keeping Ebon Dragon secret.
I wasn't arguing that she was allowed to bend the Rules. I was arguing that the Rules seem to have clear and possibly very narrowly defined exceptions in regards to what she can do in upholding her duties as Ebon Dragon's warden.So she can bend the rules to stop the ED from waking up but wasn't able to do so to kill the guy who we were using the charm on to begin with which was the perceived threat in her eyes? Doesn't make much sense.
What doesn't make sense to me is why she says that as a reason to dismiss him and letting him off which is what would've happened had he not stuck around. As that quote says she was free to kill him. If he was killed we wouldn't have had reason to keep using the charm and it's target for active use would've been taken out stopping the charm.
So the problem would've been solved and killing him should've been easier and faster than doing so to us. It's weird that she didn't kill him the moment she showed up, solving the problem immediately. If we told her no or that it wasn't doing as such without evidence, I'm pretty sure she would've started blasting rather than turn around and kill the HollowMan stopping the charm use on the spot then going from there.
I'm not sure she was allowed to act against him. Note that she says "were you not truthful, I would smite you for calling upon me". It is plausible that the Rules she operates under have something like "if an enemy you are normally allowed to attack calls you to prevent Ebon Dragon from waking up, you are not allowed to attack them while stopping the cause of Ebon Dragon waking up". It sorta makes sense, in order to encourage forces normally hostile to Heavens to report this. Remember, Outsiders have multiple factions - at least two we know of (Neverborn and Raksha). And this is not just any Neverborn, but Ebon Dragon's Neverborn. No one, possibly not even other Neverborn, wants that guy up and around.
You said "When discharging said duty, she is allowed to do stuff that would normally be prohibited by the Rules".I wasn't arguing that she was allowed to bend the Rules. I was arguing that the Rules seem to have clear and possibly very narrowly defined exceptions in regards to what she can do in upholding her duties as Ebon Dragon's warden.
It looks like you are backtracking here a bit with your first sentence and it's making this confusing.I'm not sure she was allowed to act against him. Note that she says "were you not truthful, I would smite you for calling upon me". It is plausible that the Rules she operates under have something like "if an enemy you are normally allowed to attack calls you to prevent Ebon Dragon from waking up, you are not allowed to attack them while stopping the cause of Ebon Dragon waking up". It sorta makes sense, in order to encourage forces normally hostile to Heavens to report this. Remember, Outsiders have multiple factions - at least two we know of (Neverborn and Raksha). And this is not just any Neverborn, but Ebon Dragon's Neverborn. No one, possibly not even other Neverborn, wants that guy up and around.
So, she plausibly couldn't attack Empty Man.
This seems to be a language issue in our communication. To me "bend the rules" means to creatively interpret the rules to act in ways they are meant to discourage or prohibit without outright breaking them. If an exception is in the Rules to begin with, then it's not bending the Rules to apply said exception when intended.You said "When discharging said duty, she is allowed to do stuff that would normally be prohibited by the Rules".
That means bend or sidestep or ignore them to complete her mission.
I disagree. She says "have you called me on false pretenses, I would smite you". This may mean that she cannot smite him if the pretenses are correct, i.e. there's a risk to her mission. When the situation is resolved she acts against him, though in a non-lethal fashion. The limited scope of retribution might be because he sincerely believed he was right, and intent usually matters in such things.It looks like you are backtracking here a bit with your first sentence and it's making this confusing.
I don't think that makes much sense seeing as in this case he was literally part of the cause and killing him would've stopped it right then and there. She could've carried out her mission and kill someone she had motive to kill unrelated to the ED.
-
She could've as I see it and according to your previous statement. It looks like she just actively choose not to.
Um.This seems to be a language issue in our communication. To me "bend the rules" means to creatively interpret the rules to act in ways they are meant to discourage or prohibit without outright breaking them. If an exception is in the Rules to begin with, then it's not bending the Rules to apply said exception when intended.
It could also be her making a judgement call, rather than her following a Rule that screwed us over while allowing the Outsider aligned who we were applying the charm to that she saw as a threat to use to leave scott free.I disagree. She says "have you called me on false pretenses, I would smite you". This may mean that she cannot smite him if the pretenses are correct, i.e. there's a risk to her mission. When the situation is resolved she acts against him, though in a non-lethal fashion. The limited scope of retribution might be because he sincerely believed he was right, and intent usually matters in such things.
Empty Man wasn't a threat to her mission. We were. Yes, we only used SSC to deal with him, I agree, but we had free will, and we could use other tools, and we had the charm to potentially remotely wake Ebon Dragon. From the perspective where the top priority is preventing Ebon Dragon from waking up, dealing with us seems a better choice, and like the least violation of Free Will.She can ignore Rules to carry out her mission but the task that allows her to do so also has a clause that says "if someone summons you to deal with a threat to your mission you can't smite them for any reason if they believe it justified and it's potentially plausible even if they themselves are an active component of the perceived threat to your mission that they summoned you for in the first place and you'd typically be allowed to kill them, and killing them would accomplish your mission faster and impose less risk to it".
That sort of Rule handling doesn't seem cock and bull to you?
I don't know why you are assuming that the HM had no Free Will in his actions. At any rate this logic only makes any sense if you take some of the previously stated context out of the situation and act like it doesn't exist. Details regarding the situation that would be readily apparent to the Angel.Empty Man wasn't a threat to her mission. We were. Yes, we only used SSC to deal with him, I agree, but we had free will, and we could use other tools, and we had the charm to potentially remotely wake Ebon Dragon. From the perspective where the top priority is preventing Ebon Dragon from waking up, dealing with us seems a better choice, and like the least violation of Free Will.
The paranoiac in me wants to take this as a hint to immediately reverse course, but I think I won't listen to him.Update will be tomorrow to give you guys a bit more time to decide what do do about the Lovecraftian monstrosity you encountered in the deep places of the world.
1) John Q. Mortal is still able to just wander over if they want. Any Egyptian university that discovered evidence of this place would have no real issue getting to the point of digging it up. Past that ending up walking into Mordor would only be a matter of time.1) The place is not exactly safe or easy to get in. It's buried under sand, which requires heavy excavation equipment, it's full of poisonous gas and most likely traps inside, and it is a shadowland, meaning that magic is probably bad there. You almost certainly cannot get in through NeverNever either. It's an obscure place of dread. The core contents are unlikely to be known to anyone, and it's not like it's an only place of horror in the world.
2) Frequent traffic as compared to a random patch of nowhere deep in the desert. It's not a trade road, but it's an ex/infiltration path to Yomi hells. Plenty of wan kuei and akuma are using it.
Also, notably the angel doesn't stop anyone from learning about the tomb, merely messing with it - if she did, the empty man wouldn't be able to know about it, and call on her in the first place.
The answer is that it is no place, as easy to emerge into a graveyard in Romania desecrated by the bulldozers send to level the ground for urban development as it is an ancient temple complex set up by the pre-pharaohnic dead. Wherever the the ground of the dead was defiled they are.
Is it a valid target for MiM? Technically that charm can be used with any action we take to kill rather than our own hands by RaW, and the vibe of this place is very "nuke and devour the souls of everything in the region just to be sure"-able.Update will be tomorrow to give you guys a bit more time to decide what do do about the Lovecraftian monstrosity you encountered in the deep places of the world.
Is it a valid target for MiM? Technically that charm can be used with any action we take to kill rather than our own hands by RaW, and the vibe of this place is very "nuke and devour the souls of everything in the region just to be sure"-able.
I'm not using NWS for identity. I am using it to attempt to glimpse some diverse information. The character of the being (I am not ready to just judge it as evil, for all we know this was some ancient god who died defending Creation), and the circumstances of his death - note that the expression eternally preserved on his face is shame. I suspect his greatest shame will be something to do with his death.Though @Yog why not use the scene as a target to ask who that is or where we are? Seems more reliable than just NWS.
Actually, you know what? You are right. It's important to know who that is for more context.Though @Yog why not use the scene as a target to ask who that is or where we are? Seems more reliable than just NWS.
It would also attract attention. Something I'd rather try to avoid until neededWe'll also have our anima open so we can't be surprised attacked or surprised at all.
Wait a second now that you say something we've already spent more than four Essence this scene.It would also attract attention. Something I'd rather try to avoid until needed
Our anima should already be flaring.
Fair point, but the scene after going through the portal is a new scene. @DragonParadox is our anima flaring?Wait a second now that you say something we've already spent more than four Essence this scene.
Our anima should already be flaring.
Fair point, but the scene after going through the portal is a new scene. @DragonParadox is our anima flaring?