We have a problem.
If we get the Verenans and Tileans, that's 47 Money per month if we want to keep them around permanently. We've also got 19 Mo/month for advisors, 10 Mo/month for adventurers, and 4 Mo/month for buildings, for a total ongoing cost of 80 Mo/month on top of construction+other costs. We have an income of 7 Mo/month. The situation is even direr if we go for the ogre and halfling mercenaries.
Even if we were to spend the next three weeks focusing on Money buildings, our financials are gonna suck once the end of the month hits and we have to pay our mercenaries. I think our financials might suck even if we only hire one mercenary company. To improve our financial situation, I've made a new plan.
[X] Plan
For the Love of Money
-[X] Verenan Justicars, led by Warpriest Kledhof Hildedotr - 1 month (25 Mo)
-[X] Altdorf 'Volunteers'
-[X] Freed from the desert
-[X] Talabheim Devotees
-[X] Rhyan Devoted
-[X] Ulrican Pack
The Verenans are still the mercenaries I think we should get. They take up less space so we can take more colonists, which we badly need to get us into the black, and they'll counterbalance any issues we may have with the Volunteers.
I really think we should take the Altdorf Volunteers. Shrines of Ranald are built in merchant houses, taverns, brothels, and gambling houses, all places that make money. Not only that, but well, I think we should take a look at Sylvester again. Advisors are more than just stats. Flynn has the Lucky/Unlucky trait, and Ranald, god of luck, brought Sylvester to us. I think that's important in a narrative sense, and I don't think we should pass him up now that we've got another opportunity to get him.
My reason for getting the Ulrican Pack is simple:
In the time waiting for the second wave, Ulmen has set up a fighting pit on the docks to fund his stay there.
Sounds like an avenue for profit. I think something like a third of our human colonists are Ulrican too, with the
colony sheet saying we've got colonists from Nordland, Hochland, Ostland, Middenland, and Drakwald.
I think that benevolent may be a bit excessive. The conman who steals the last coin from the little old lady and then leaves her to starve is A-OK in Ranald's book as long as he did not hold a knife to her throat. What he is is better than the alternative.
Benevolent is not excessive, it's true. Ranald is not the god of starving the poor and elderly, he's the god of protecting the downtrodden against their oppressors, and his mainstream cult is the same. It's wildly inaccurate to portray him and his followers in that way.