Is this a deliberate change? Earlier word on the matter of Integrity specialties was less optimistic:
No, that ruling is still correct. It's… hmm, maybe some more example integrity specialities would make this easier to get across.
These would all be valid:
- When helping a hurt child, or other sympathetic person.
- When confronting a declared enemy.
- When defending against a mental attack. Um, willpower also works well here.
But so would these:
- When reorganising her mind.
- When defending against a mental attack that has already partially succeeded.
- When strained by holding a nonstandard mental profile (aka. having Ran or Su separated).
- When explicitly reprogramming autonomic Overgrowth functionality.
The difference is that the first group involves aligning overgrowth with her conscious mind such that excessive control is never really needed, and is more a reduction in necessary control than it's an improvement in said control. Whereas the second group requires a better understanding of what she's doing, and involves better organised lines of control.
The first group is limited by the dot rating* of the intimacy it's keyed off (or equivalent). The second only has the usual three-dot maximum.
*Not that I've been explicitly giving you those. I'll rate them if necessary, but don't really expect it'll come up.
But really, all I'm saying is the specialities are specialities.