What are the chances this actually stays a stealth mission for more than few minutes after we arrive?
Null.What are the chances this actually stays a stealth mission for more than few minutes after we arrive?
No. On this issue, f*ck that. This is hell we are talking about. It's the worst possible state of existence. Molly specifically calls this line of reasoning BS in the last update:
No it is not.This is the direct IC refutation of your "but think of the consequences" line of reasoning.
We didnt involve Dresden because he both lacks gear, having trashed his coat in Vegas, and protection against most of the potential threats.[X] Ask him to stay home
-[X] This is, despite everything, a stealth mission - an insertion and a grab amidst an ongoing catastrophe. Michael is a swordsman, an epitome of a paladin. He is not suited for covert infiltration.
-[X] You would take his advice at the planning stage, of course
-[X] And someone needs to guard the homebase, as is.
I'll return to this vote for now (yeah, I am undecisive). The reason is internal consistency. We didn't involve Dresden to keep the mission a stealth one.
Fairly good actually.What are the chances this actually stays a stealth mission for more than few minutes after we arrive?
It's definitely something to keep in mind considering how many people are there. Though given that the Wicked City isn't on earth, the human examples aren't exactly a one to one comparison.
Not a 1:1 comparison, true.It's definitely something to keep in mind considering how many people are there. Though given that the Wicked City isn't on earth, the human examples aren't exactly a one to one comparison.
Hope is the one thing they will haveThe desperate make for fertile recruiting grounds, especially in the absence of hope, and turmoil often allows nascent organizations to keep a low profile.
Then why does no one, but me include it in the reasoning?Stealth is not the issue here; being unable to withdraw into the FFCF (our most expedient escape route, AIUI) without leaving Amorrachius behind is.
I don't want to make him sound like a liability tbh. He doesn't have a shaping defense so I'd rather not bring him there at all even if he can roll to counterspell.
Are shaping defenses even that common? Perfect ones certainly aren't common, and if they were entirely defenseless against such threats we would presumably see the Denarians using them a whole lot more.He doesn't have a shaping defense so I'd rather not bring him there at all even if he can roll to counterspell.
My understanding was that Micheal couldn't go into our hell with the sword because it was a hell, and doing that carried some sort of risk to us and to the sword.Fair enough. Back to the vote:
VOTE
[X] Accept Michael
-[X] With Amoracchius, the Sword of Love is sure to come in handy in the depths of hell
[X] Ask a couple Hand agents to babysit the Carpenter household in his absence
[X] STUNT: You exhale, a deep breath that turns into a shaky laugh. "Thats.....not a decision I feel currently qualified to weigh in on, Dad. But Im always happy to have you." Then a thought occurs to you. "But if you arent here, then I need to make some calls." You turn to Charity "Mom, I hope you dont mind some human house guests?"
RATIONALE
We accepted Michael's help the last time that there was Yama King business; Emma-O sent a greater akuma to Chicago, murdered a couple people, and kidnapped our minions. We accepted Michael's help in retrieving our minions and Tuzi's boyfriend J. I think we can accept his help in retrieving Joe Magarac.
Like someone said earlier, this appears to be an issue within the purview of mortal free will.
Never said they were. They can try for a counterspell if need be. My point was that Molly and Lydia have a guaranteed defense and Micheal doesn't.Are shaping defenses even that common? Perfect ones certainly aren't common, and if they were entirely defenseless against such threats we would presumably see the Denarians using them a whole lot more.
I thought it was because the Hell is located in Molly's soul.My understanding was that Micheal couldn't go into our hell with the sword because it was a hell, and doing that carried some sort of risk to us and to the sword.
Hell is the absence of God, at least that is what I am going with here, hence technically the FfCoF are a kind of hell.
This is an actually reasonable consideration, and one thats reasonable to bring up.Stealth is not the issue here; being unable to withdraw into the FFCF (our most expedient escape route, AIUI) without leaving Amorrachius behind is.
I don't want to make him sound like a liability tbh. He doesn't have a shaping defense so I'd rather not bring him there at all even if he can roll to counterspell.
Butters wielding Fidelacchius perfect defense'd an attack by Ethniu using Gugnir.Are shaping defenses even that common? Perfect ones certainly aren't common, and if they were entirely defenseless against such threats we would presumably see the Denarians using them a whole lot more.
My understanding is that Michael couldnt go into our Hell with the Sword because it was the Hell of an Infernal Exalt, formed in part of a living mortal soul and protected by some of the miscellaneous bullshit of an Exalt, and the Sword couldnt go into it without in some way toeing the line of compromising our free will.My understanding was that Micheal couldn't go into our hell with the sword because it was a hell, and doing that carried some sort of risk to us and to the sword.
Considering DP's ruling about hell being a place without god by definition and how angels are backed I'm concerned about it being hazardous to the swords in the sense that home office can't do as much of anything for them in that sort of place without breaking whatever agreement allows the hells to exist in the first place.
As happened with Murphy, mortals are allowed to make choices that are negative to the swords. Being allowed isn't the same as being a good idea.
I meant without a Sword... I don't want to lock out the FFC as an escape route as my previous post would indicate.Im confident about the ability of a Knight wielding a Sword to ignore shaping attacks.
Yeah, except that there was never anything said about it being locked because of the mortal soul thing. We just assumed that because it makes a certain level of sense.This is an actually reasonable consideration, and one thats reasonable to bring up.
On the other hand, with both Lydia and Nergui available, we have two alternative methods of egress from the Wicked City.
Which is in part why they are coming with, instead of Molly doing a solo run.
Butters wielding Fidelacchius perfect defense'd an attack by Ethniu using Gugnir.
Murphy wielding Fidelacchius shaping defense'd the AoE shaping paralysis attack of the Lords of Outer Night at Chitchen Itza
Im confident about the ability of a Knight wielding a Sword to ignore shaping attacks.
My understanding is that Michael couldnt go into our Hell with the Sword because it was the Hell of an Infernal Exalt, formed in part of a living mortal soul and protected by some of the miscellaneous bullshit of an Exalt, and the Sword couldnt go into it without in some way toeing the line of compromising our free will.
Yomi Wan is not encompassed by the soul of a mortal.
Its an independent thing, or a bunch of independent things stapled together, and even the entities who become Yama Kings are essentially plugging into an independent battery/generator.
I dont think Hells are hazardous to Swords, or can be.
Thats the sort of thing that would be made clear up front, instead of this no real support or objection status. Certainly Amoracchius had no trouble travelling to the afterlife ruled by Hades in Skin Game, and coming back out.
It will have to wait for confirmation by the QM, of course.I meant without a Sword... I don't want to lock out the FFC as an escape route as my other post would indicate.
I cant really go trawling through to check right now, but I think that was mentioned at some point.Yeah, except that there was never anything said about it being locked because of the mortal soul thing. We just assumed that because it makes a certain level of sense.
Instead when this came up we got point blank the post I quoted. Which is why I think you're flipping cause and effect here.
Pushing into a hell seems highly likely to proc a clash between the nature of the hell and the nature of the Angel. In most cases that's environment damage, but Molly is the environment in the FCF so it's relevant. The strain of this may not be one way.