I don't like the fluff for the growth, and I doubt we'd really have time for the side quests.
Setting that aside, it's just not scaled right for the impact this sort of event should have from the start in my view. New Idaho doesn't strike the cosmic event vibe right. It shouldn't just slip in.
I'm surprised you even built something like that since you've been emphatically against a large hell since the start.
If we picked yours would you even vote for the actions you're suggesting?
Im affirmative we will. We are going to Yomi Wan anyway.
Side quests are chances to earn XP, and have always been, and we never have enough of it.
I mean the leading vote right now requires that we invest effort in side quests or deal with rebellious people.
I dont agree with the impact argument.
Its not like domains are unique; we saw part of Hades' domain in Skin Games, and we have been explicitly told by Butcher that the wizard Rashid the Gatekeeper has a domain past the moon. And Mikaboshi outright carved one out of Yomi Wan as a mortal.
Ours is special in age and degree. Its not unprecedented.
I think we are getting our wires crossed.
Im not against a large Hell and I dont think I've ever argued against one. As you'll notice, I asked the QM specifically if we could upgrade size if we start with a smaller Hell.
What I was against is prioritizing Size over everything else; as long as we were able to maintain a minimum size to sustain a nation-state level population with advanced technology, it became a matter of tradeoffs.
I would put Size as more important than Bottleneck, but features like Lord of the Land as way more important than World Size; World Size is just a flex, while Lord of the Land has narrative and mechanical consequences.
Pay attention to how Lord of the Land interacts with Kingdom as a signature charm, for example.