- Location
- USA
- Pronouns
- He/Him
It'll be out of date very quickly and I don't want to maintain it.
It'll be out of date very quickly and I don't want to maintain it.
bipedal/quad combination has been ruled out already. Needs to be purely quad.An interchangeable bipedal/quad canine race would suit Moose, as long as he still looks like himself. I'm thinking a pack support traits, and loyalty traits. Constitution bonuses.. Interchangable thumbs so he can operate items now. Or maybe go MyPony route and straight up soft telekinesis.. Or prehensile tail or clear use of snout and tongue to operate items.
It'd be really interesting to see the Paladin class Eaglejarl wanted to try out. If he already has racial pack bonus then stuff like aura could mesh really well with that.
Category:Mythological canines - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Also.. Since he's already a Tibetian Mastiff - he'd qualify for something eastern like Inugami?
Yes and yes.Would a Wolf still qualify?
Werewolf would be out because it allows Moose to stand on 2 legs in some situations, right?
That absolutely sounds like a dungeon race. Holy shit this is cool.Dogs of Tibetan Legends
The 11th century scholar, Mahmud ibn Hussayn ibn Muhammed al-Kashgari, spoke of strange legend found in the Diwan which concerns the baraq, or shaggy dog. Turks claimed that when a vulture grows old, it lays two eggs. When hatched, one of the eggs produces a dog called Baraq, the swiftest of...nationalpurebreddogday.com
Interesting, Tibetian Mastiff guardians were thought to be Raksasas in disguise. Basically shapeshfting deva-demons
Rakshasa - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Rakshasas were most often depicted as shape-shifting, fierce-looking, enormous monstrous-looking creatures, with two fangs protruding from the top of the mouth and having sharp, claw-like fingernails. They were shown as being mean, growling beasts, and as insatiable man-eaters that could smell the scent of human flesh. Some of the more ferocious ones were shown with flaming red eyes and hair, drinking blood with their cupped hands or from human skulls (similar to representations of vampires in later Western mythology). Generally they could fly, vanish, and had maya (magical powers of illusion), which enabled them to change size at will and assume the form of any creature.
Just saying, the showrunners are not powerless. If we take Sysop and Wheeler Dealer, it'll be a declaration of war. We'd be an actual threat, and those get accelerated. What's protecting us from their malign attention.
My fellow questers, it is with a heavy heart that I implore you to vote for catkin Leo and wizard supremacist Drew. It is in the nature of quests to take risks, how can we deny our nature? If we pull that off we can have the aesthetic of legendary cats and dogs playing together, two super strong front line fighters to protect the GigaChad Drew build! We can have it all ladies, gentlemen, and those not identified by either. Additionally, if we ever want to take wizard supremacist for the benefits, it will be far easier to do it earlier than later.
Live our best lives, vote for the gacha and OP class!
In all fairness, here's a relevant Discord post made by eaglejarl.No holy warriors of dungeon gods, that way leads to having to deal with stupid bullshit.
IIRC eaglejarl's very next message was the name of a canon God whose demands could be considered "minimal". That God was seen to impose multiple super-hard unavoidable quests to his worshippers, will kill you if you attempt to go past a certain layer without doing the quests, and also demands a tithe + not to harm your fellow worshippers (even though mobs can be worshippers).In all fairness, here's a relevant Discord post made by eaglejarl.
-"Levi did say to avoid gods if at all possible. On the other hand (metaknowledge), there are some gods with minimal demands on you and decent advantages. The concern is that gods can issue mandatory quests to their worshipers, so that's always a hidden landmine."
- Eaglejarl, 2022
Rude if they are voting for another (Drew) option. Fine if they have not + their vote is super old and they may not be aware of the current voting system.I am not good at socializing. How rude would it be to tag the five people voting for Catkin Leo but not Wizard Supremacist?
If there is a new development and you have arguments for them i wouldn't consider it rude.I am not good at socializing. How rude would it be to tag the five people voting for Catkin Leo but not Wizard Supremacist?
Only one of them has a (Drew) vote at all, and two of them voted on Thursday. I'm still going to wait a little to get arguments, but I am now leaning towards tagging at least the four that haven't voted for Drew.If there is a new development and you have arguments for them i wouldn't consider it rude.
If you are spamming them because they are voting in a way you don't like that would be rude. Depending on the severity i'd consider it reason to report posts and let the mods deal with it. (but that would really be for spammy mentioning)
Well, since we're dropping canon knowledge, let's set the record straight: the god in question makes the following standard demands:IIRC eaglejarl's very next message was the name of a canon God whose demands could be considered "minimal". That God was seen to impose multiple super-hard unavoidable quests to his worshippers, will kill you if you attempt to go past a certain layer without doing the quests, and also demands a tithe + not to harm your fellow worshippers (even though mobs can be worshippers).In all fairness, here's a relevant Discord post made by eaglejarl.
-"Levi did say to avoid gods if at all possible. On the other hand (metaknowledge), there are some gods with minimal demands on you and decent advantages. The concern is that gods can issue mandatory quests to their worshipers, so that's always a hidden landmine."
- Eaglejarl, 2022
I don't consider that "minimal", and although we're all allowed to have different perspectives on what is acceptable I'm also allowed to vote against any option that entangles us with Gods.
One data point: it wouldn't bother me so long as it came with an explanation of "your chosen option is probably going to lose and here is how to make it win if you want."I am not good at socializing. How rude would it be to tag the five people voting for Catkin Leo but not Wizard Supremacist?