Remove ads

Hugh's Perfectly Normal Mafia Game Where Nothing Weird Happens Whatsoever

Reader mode
Nictis said:
D2 of She-Ra you didn't really convince people not to vote Zaealix, but you *did* start asking people to vote Zone after I put out that I would be going to check on building a case against Zaealix because Shalmoa/Hugh seemed like potential Town/Town with scum just not interfering. D3 was different circumstances to here since Zaealix was getting caught out as scum but had room to wiggle with the claim, while Logos was caught out because of the claim. You again ask people to start voting with you on an alternative case. D4 you specifically chose to revive me, the person who had the role Zaealix was claiming? Actively setting up Zaealix to be killed and that was only prevented because of Zone deciding that the game had to be decided by being either Shalmoa or Zone that dies.

So yeah.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Day 3 Zae was going to be yeeted, but I convinced everyone to no vote instead. Day 4 Zae was going to be yeeted, but I convinced everyone that since we already knew he was scum we should vote someone else. I was active both times and actually cared about who was eliminated. Here I am a townie who replaced in the middle of the day with no idea of what was really going on so didn't have any care stake on who was eliminated. I just wanted to give you guys content from a slot that had been 0 posting.
 
Seven said:
links two games of being precognitive to show they've been precognitive in the past
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
They specifically said that they couldn't remember it ever happening, when it's a pretty established thing that I do. It's also specific post links and not saying to check my post behavior in an entire game for comparison.

For your claim of behavior in She-Ra I had to go skim about 30 pages of posts. For my claim of having known things I shouldn't I only had to point at a specific time I had done that. Bit of a difference with me linking to exactly what I'm talking about and it being in addition to the stated reason it was done this game, and you saying that it's broadly different from your scumplay in a previous game.
 
Seven said:
Day 3 Zae was going to be yeeted, but I convinced everyone to no vote instead. Day 4 Zae was going to be yeeted, but I convinced everyone that since we already knew he was scum we should vote someone else. I was active both times and actually cared about who was eliminated. Here I am a townie who replaced in the middle of the day with no idea of what was really going on so didn't have any care stake on who was eliminated. I just wanted to give you guys content from a slot that had been 0 posting.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Please don't make me actually go pull quotes from a separate game over an entire page of posts in order to showcase how you did the exact same thing Day 2 of this game as you did Day 3 of that game, and how you didn't convince anyone to vote out someone else Day 4 of that game.
 
Nictis said:
Please don't make me actually go pull quotes from a separate game over an entire page of posts in order to showcase how you did the exact same thing Day 2 of this game as you did Day 3 of that game, and how you didn't convince anyone to vote out someone else Day 4 of that game.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I can see how you could think they're the same but not at all. Here I made some overtly lavish claims and then dipped. There I was guiding people to an end result. No dipping. No sauce.
 
Actually, I'm just going to preemptively say that I'm not going to do that. My vote is on you and I'm good for the Day, I'm not particularly feeling like I need to go burn myself out digging up a cross-game scum case.
Seven said:
Honestly I'm so towny it's kind of obvious.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
You're really not. Given that you were actively trying to save Mafia that you knew was Mafia and dipped out of the game the same way that Logos did.
 
Yeah no use arguing about it further, I can genuinely see how you could think I'm scum from your perspective!

Shadell on the other hand, hmm.
 
Me: did Nictis kill Comi to frame me?

Everyone: omg that's such a scummy thing to say

Nictis: pushes me for scum reading Comi
 
I think it's pretty well established that your scum read on Comi is not the reason I'm pushing you.
 
Seven said:
@Walker do you agree that my reason to suss Comi was baseless?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Your citing this post is something I agree with, and I believe I've expressed my own concerns about it previously. However, I would have liked to see you build further by citing more evidence rather than immediately pushing for town to vote.
Nictis said:
Going by the list alone and nothing else, I'm gonna say heavy heavy shade on Walker. Lovers are informed of who they are in love with, and usually are told that they can win with their Lover, and that if their lover dies then they die with them. This doesn't really work as a fake vanilla role.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I think it's worth reiterating that this is a bastard game, so normal expectations do not apply, and I'm not going to claim to know the identity of the other Lover when I don't even know if they exist.

Also, could you explain a little more clearly what the Alienist role does? I'm afraid it's not one I'm familiar with.
 
Seven said:
grating aaf? Did I do something wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Your posting style reads like low effort shitposting that compensates for lack of any signal for maximum white noise. Half your posts are completely baseless assertions stated with 100% certainty and the rest are "lol trust me bro". You do not give the impression of engaging with the game in any genuine manner and that makes engaging with you aggressively aggravating.

Walker said:
Are you intending to sheep Seven here?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
...No, thanks for pointing that out.

Zaealix said:
but it might be he was culted night 1 and I can't actually catch that…
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I deprogrammed Nictis N1, so.

Seven said:
Tbf I have no intention of actually reading the game.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Ah. Policy vote time:
[x] Vote Seven

Nictis said:
Anyways, Seven is definitely Mafia here.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Also valid reasons.
 
Seven said:
Like I was totes just being silly there, I didn't think people would follow me for my half-arsed reasoning even if I did think he was scum.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

That does seem at odds with @'ing people to vote Comi as you did with me. Why did you do that then if you didn't think people would follow you?

@LostDeviljho I understand you just policy voted, but aside of Seven, who would you vote right now?

I will later reread the last EOD to see how the Logos vote developed and see if I can learn something of that.
 
LostDeviljho said:
Ah. Policy vote time:
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
lol the fact that you don't actually think I'm scum is so suss. So much TMI. You know I'm going to flip town unlike Nictis who is voting me because they genuinely believe I'm scum. You on the other hand are just aiming for a ml despite not thinking I'm maf and lazily going for policy or "because they're grating."
 
Grabbed some quotes when I saw Seven tag Walker for backup because I saw it being really funnily similar to Day 3.

Seven said:
p#272 So Logos is a mafia doctor. No reason to claim all of that Day 2. Also I'm confused under what condition would you be shown as visiting @Logos? You said if your target isn't killed you're not seen as visiting, and if your target is strongman killed you're not seen as visiting. Aren't those the only two situations?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Seven said:
What are your thoughts on ComiTurtle @Logos
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Logos said:
Before doing a quick review of his posts, my gut feel is that he's slightly town. There's not much there, but he's been participating and has a reputation for insight.

Reading back through briefly, my impression doesn't change much. I don't like the question in #223, but that one was self-admitted as not a very good question and mostly poking for additional thoughts on why people were voting where they were. Poor town play, is my guess, rather than scum.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Seven said:
#427 by Shadell is ngl

Comi > Shadell > Logos atm

Maybe not logos, I like their answer above and Comi who is mafia is voting them.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Seven said:
Logos is a mafia doctor.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
 
Hm Zaealix claimed early Day 2 as well if I recall? Not full claim but implied he was an investigator. To those more familiar with him, is that normal. Implying so obviously that he's a PR without concern for being night killed?
 
LDj and Zaealix had the same reaction to me today. It's odd. Scum mad that I was right about the night kill? Scum mad that I was wrong about em the night kill? The saltiness is just so weird, I'm not sure it comes from a town perspective.
 
Seven said:
Nictis, in the world where I flip town m, what do you think about LDj policy voting and this post:
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
NAI. You have been intentionally acting irritating to bog things down and kill enthusiasm, misconstruing what other's posts are saying, and you outright saying that you have no intent of actually reading the game you're playing is a reason to policy kill you, even ignoring that you were actively defending someone you knew was Mafia to try to kill someone you couldn't be bothered to build a case on and that you coming into the game claiming to not being willing to actually read is just a cheap excuse to throw random BS on the wall and act like it's not scummy.
 
Nictis said:
NAI. You have been intentionally acting irritating to bog things down and kill enthusiasm, misconstruing what other's posts are saying, and you outright saying that you have no intent of actually reading the game you're playing is a reason to policy kill you, even ignoring that you were actively defending someone you knew was Mafia to try to kill someone you couldn't be bothered to build a case on and that you coming into the game claiming to not being willing to actually read is just a cheap excuse to throw random BS on the wall and act like it's not scummy.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
The key phrase there is "in the world where I flip town." Your answer implies scum motivation so doesn't really answer the question. You don't think it's odd that LDj thinks I'm going to flip town but what's to use a third ML on me anyway? Ignore your feelings for today, I'm going to be yeeted, I'm not arguing against that, right now I'm trying to prepare you for tomorrow.
 
Reader mode
You must login or register to reply here.
Remove ads
Back
Top