The INDEX Initiative: Not!XCOM Planquest

The vote is still open.
Adhoc vote count started by Oshha on Nov 29, 2021 at 3:25 PM, finished with 22 posts and 9 votes.

  • [X] Plan KnightDisciple v0.675
    -[X] Bravo Base (Phase 1) [2 Dice] (20 Resources)
    -[X] Enigma Site (Phase 1) [2 Dice; 1 Infra+ 1 Free] (40 Resources)
    -[X] Top Off Stocks [2 Dice] (10 Resources)
    -[X] Establish Supplier Contracts [2 Dice] (20 Resources)
    -[X] Establish PR Office [2 Dice] (20 Resources)
    -[X] Medical Outreach [2 Dice] (20 Resources)
    -[X] Analyse Alien Encounters [2 Dice] (40 Resources)
    -[X] Study A-Class UFOs [2 Dice] (40 Resources)
    -[X] Security Division [1 Die] (15 Resources)
    -[X] National Liaisons [2 Dice] (20 Resources)
    -[X] Anti-UFO Interceptor Development [2 Dice] (50 Resources)
    -[X] Rapid Global Transport Development [1 Die] (20 Resources)
    -[X] Strategic Planning [3 Dice] (15 Resources)
    [X] Exploiting UFOs whilst remembering Free Dice
    -[X] Echo Base (Phase 1) 2d 20R
    -[X] Enigma Site (Phase 1) 2d 40R
    -[X] Top Off Stocks 1d 5R
    -[X] Establish Supplier Contracts 1d 10R
    -[X] Acquiring Factories 2d 20R
    -[X] Establish PR Office 2d 20R
    -[X] Medical Outreach 2d 20R
    -[X] Analyze Alien Encounters 2d 40R
    -[X] Study A-Class UFOs 2d 40R
    -[X] Security Division 1d 15R
    -[X] National Liaisons 1d 10R
    -[X] Rapid Global Transport Development 1d 20R
    -[X] Anti-UFO Interceptor Development 3d 75R
 
[X] Plan Finish up, look at Aliens and rapid Transport
Infrastructure (4/3 Dice) 60R 1FD
-[X] Echo Base (Phase 1) (16/100, 2D, 20R)
-[X] Enigma Site (Phase 1) (0/100, 2D, 40R)
Industry (4/4 Dice) 35R
-[X] Top Off Stocks (65/100, 1D, 5R)
-[X] Establish Supplier Contracts (108/150, 1D, 10R)
-[X] Acquiring Factories (0/100, 2D, 20R)
Services (4/4 Dice) 40R
-[X] Medical Outreach (0/120, 2D, 20R)
-[X] Establish PR Office (0/100, 2D, 20R)
Research (4/4 Dice) 80R
-[X] Analyse Alien Encounters (0/100, 2D, 40R)
-[X] Study A-Class UFOs (0/100, 2D, 40R)
Military (5/6 Dice) 85R
-[X] Security Division (190/200, 1D, 15R)
-[X] National Liaisons (45/100, 1D, 10R)
-[X] Rapid Global Transport Development (0/120, 3D, 60R)
Administration (3/3 Dice) 15R
-[X] Strategic Planning (0/200, 3D, 15R)

60+35+40+80+85+15=315
 
Last edited:
So @Aerrow Shadow, just wondering, why are you making a plan that is leaving dice unfilled, considering our limiting factor isn't our budget but our dice right now? Are you anticipating a big price spike in all our stuff?
 
Last edited:
We also don't have to use a rocket for that last mile delivery. A two stage system with a reusable booster that puts a reentry vehicle on a barista path and sets down not too far from that launch site is workable. The reentry vehicle can even be a glider that can execute evasive maneuvers when back in atmo.
Interceptor payloads might even have a ramjet or other engine to increase their combat endurance.
Problem that i see is that a Reusable boosters have been tried by the Air force and canned due to DoD budget cuts and a Negative report but i presume that it did not produce any worthwhile results(Don't know anymore details because its behind a paywall I am NOT going to pay 20 dollars for that shit or am i gonna spend my time trying to find a Pirated copy)
And what you propose while the most fastest is gonna be the most expensive one as well and beyond a dozen or so launches i do not see it being feasible currently

We don't need factories right now when we don't even know what sort of equipment will be best against the aliens.
Conventional missiles do work on UFOs as seen before but anything on an infantry level is unknown due to no encounters but from what has been shown i don't think anything that is too outrageous
 
Problem that i see is that a Reusable boosters have been tried by the Air force and canned due to DoD budget cuts and a Negative report but i presume that it did not produce any worthwhile results(Don't know anymore details because its behind a paywall I am NOT going to pay 20 dollars for that shit or am i gonna spend my time trying to find a Pirated copy)
And what you propose while the most fastest is gonna be the most expensive one as well and beyond a dozen or so launches i do not see it being feasible currently

Conventional missiles do work on UFOs as seen before but anything on an infantry level is unknown due to no encounters but from what has been shown i don't think anything that is too outrageous

tried by the Air force

Well there's your problem! :V
But no, seriously, I can't stress how fucked up US military R&D and procurement is. The Pentagon has literally squashed any attempt at financial transparency because they would look inept at best. I would take anything they have to say on the matter with a serious grain of salt.

Send me the link to the paper? I'll see if SciHub has it.

I'm also skleptical that it would be more expensive than developing an aircraft for the task, simply because the loads and stresses a super/hypersonic aricraft has to deal with are so much more complex than the ones a rocket experiences. I think given equal amounts of spending on rocket and aircraft technology, rocket R&D gets us better capability per dollar simply because we can bypass so many of the inherent limitations of aircraft.
 
Well there's your problem! :V
But no, seriously, I can't stress how fucked up US military R&D and procurement is. The Pentagon has literally squashed any attempt at financial transparency because they would look inept at best. I would take anything they have to say on the matter with a serious grain of salt.
Ah I apologies i am not intimately familiar with the US internal politicks

Send me the link to the paper? I'll see if SciHub has it.
Name: Reusable Booster System – Review and Assessment

I'm also skleptical that it would be more expensive than developing an aircraft for the task, simply because the loads and stresses a super/hypersonic aricraft has to deal with are so much more complex than the ones a rocket experiences. I think given equal amounts of spending on rocket and aircraft technology, rocket R&D gets us better capability per dollar simply because we can bypass so many of the inherent limitations of aircraft.
What you are saying is true but rockets are usually a one time use thing and current rocket tech is still expensive and it is gonna get more cheaper and easier and so on but reaching that level of Rocket sophistication is gonna take time

and in the time we are developing it better alternatives may show themselves from Alien salvages that make Aircrafts a better option, And there is much more experience doing high end Aircraft than Rockets

My main gripe with the Rocket idea is costs and efficiency of usage of it But it does not account for Reusable Boosters idea which there not much details that i know of
 
Ah I apologies i am not intimately familiar with the US internal politicks
It IRL is currently is a huge mess...
In fact when someone mentioned trump....
Well sadly, if it was JUST TRUMP, it would be probably somewhat manageable. but, It seems very much having some random millionaire hijack the Republican Party from their party heads left the Democrat heads quite scared, and seemed to make a point of painting absolutely everything connected to him as possible in as negative a light as possible...
Now he doesn't exactly make it hard at times, considering his complete disregard for being 'politically correct' though...
Hopefully that nonsense gets completely derailed as a side affect of the invasion, both because of how inflammatory it is right now, and also the fact it likely would be quite problematic for us...

As far as the military stuff...
Not really sure, besides the fact that some stuff can be blown out of proportion, like the 'alleged troop carrier' that is actually rather simply explained by it not actually being a troop carrier.

Namely the fact that Troop carrier is technically part of it's function, but a bit of a misnomer.
 
Until we can get some proper long-range rapid troop transports, what aircraft should we start buying up?

I'm thinking Lockheed Martin C-130J Hercules and/or Ilyushin Il-76 cargo planes for a start.
 
Pretty sure the guy who was a major "contributer" for Pentagon Wars is buddy-buddy with William Lind, the jackhole whe dreamed up the nightmare that is Victoria, so take it with 5 shakers of salt.

Anyways, I'll let @Oshha , who is running this game, elaborate on how our research into a rapid transport works instead of trying to dictate it to him.
 
Pretty sure the guy who was a major "contributer" for Pentagon Wars is buddy-buddy with William Lind, the jackhole whe dreamed up the nightmare that is Victoria, so take it with 5 shakers of salt.
Ah yes the "reformers" those idiots who believe WW2 designs is suitable for a 21 century battlefield. This is showcased with they utter loathing for a plane mounted radar because it's too "fragile" and prone to errors.

This is ignoring the radar can help the pilot Sport enemy planes from several kilometres away and guides a middle to it.

And even they stay away from Lind because he's more radioactive than Chernobyl.
 
Last edited:
Pretty sure the guy who was a major "contributer" for Pentagon Wars is buddy-buddy with William Lind, the jackhole whe dreamed up the nightmare that is Victoria, so take it with 5 shakers of salt.

Anyways, I'll let @Oshha , who is running this game, elaborate on how our research into a rapid transport works instead of trying to dictate it to him.

Yeah, I'll try to type up a longer response when I get home, but I very deliberately didn't use Pentagon Wars as an example because IIRC it's not a very accurate rendition of how things went down.
The Pentagon IS in a highly incestuous relationship with the Military-Industrial complex, but the details are a lot more boring than that movie presents them as.
 
Yeah, I looked it up, and learned something new...
Namely, that a group that has the author of THAT ONE BOOK as their middle man, definitely makes little sense if actually looked at... :facepalm:

Edit:
And even they stay away from Lind because he's more radioactive than Chernobyl.
Didn't they at least at one point had him in their group?
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I'll try to type up a longer response when I get home, but I very deliberately didn't use Pentagon Wars as an example because IIRC it's not a very accurate rendition of how things went down.
The Pentagon IS in a highly incestuous relationship with the Military-Industrial complex, but the details are a lot more boring than that movie presents them as.
For one thing the movie seems not to get the whole concept of an IFV. Like, the Bradley is not some kind of unique abomination among fighting vehicles. Most armies worldwide have an equivalent.
 
Ah I apologies i am not intimately familiar with the US internal politicks


Name: Reusable Booster System – Review and Assessment


What you are saying is true but rockets are usually a one time use thing and current rocket tech is still expensive and it is gonna get more cheaper and easier and so on but reaching that level of Rocket sophistication is gonna take time

and in the time we are developing it better alternatives may show themselves from Alien salvages that make Aircrafts a better option, And there is much more experience doing high end Aircraft than Rockets

My main gripe with the Rocket idea is costs and efficiency of usage of it But it does not account for Reusable Boosters idea which there not much details that i know of

Ok, here's a copy of the full paper. Don't have time to read it today, but I'll come back to it when I have more time for a more thorough accounting.

Off the top of my head it looks like they wanted to make the booster into a spaceplane type thing, which, yeah, that's was immediately going to introduce complications vs just doing a retro-propulsive burn.
 
So to go on to another topic.

How will we transport the remains of an alien craft we shot down to one of our bases for research?

We could possibly use the Rapid Global Transport, though since it's commissioned by our spec ops branch it may not have enough capacity to carry anything beyond a 12 person strike team and maybe an armed drone tank.
 
Back
Top