Until Apo-chan decides to bring the Foremost back because she thought things weren't interesting enough.
Not really. We are only really required to win in this universe and, as far as we know, we are slowly but surely approaching the top of the food chain.
Until Apo-chan decides to bring the Foremost back because she thought things weren't interesting enough.
Mhm. If it's an Cursebearer, why not let him/her kill Aobaru in exchange for helping us for the rest of his/her time here? Surely, two Cursebearer can face down an Apocryphal onslaught!I'm still wondering whether Apocrypha is going to support the other Cursebearer against us. One the one hand he is perfect material for empowerment, but on the other hand she promises an Apocryphal Onslaught if Aobaru dies. I'm getting mixed signals here! If she wants Aobaru to survive, why doesn't she let up on Hunger a bit?
I'm still wondering whether Apocrypha is going to support the other Cursebearer against us. One the one hand he is perfect material for empowerment, but on the other hand she promises an Apocryphal Onslaught if Aobaru dies. I'm getting mixed signals here! If she wants Aobaru to survive, why doesn't she let up on Hunger a bit?
There's gonna be another challenge after this one, I'm pretty sure.Not really. We are only really required to win in this universe and, as far as we know, we are slowly but surely approaching the top of the food chain.
She's pretty explicit about her motivation though:I think what's likely happening is that the death of the Voyaging Realm's Chosen One, Aoboru in this case, sets up various circumstances that allow the curse to be able to make Hunger's life a whole lot more interesting then it normally would.
Her mood determines Apo-chan's actions far more than anything else including Mitigation, it feels like to me. Just curious why she doesn't offer temporary Mitigation to Hunger if she is so incensed by the possibility of Aobaru's death.
I have issues with implications of that question tbh, since we actually do have pretty good reasons; we did choose to proc chains that put a boy who is going to save scattered and chaotic Voyaging Realm into danger before his time. Focusing on protecting him is not wrong, be it simple preference or long-term considerations of how he is eventually fated to influence VR.Honest question here to you, and will, all the Tower Voters. If it turns out Hunger isn't that good, that he not only gambled with other people lives for no good reason but also failed, how do you feel like that reflects on him as a person?
Apo mitigation always was, and always will be mostly incremental. I had seen the thread repeatedly refuse mitigation, often reasoning it with "we'll just outscale it" and "5% percent mitigation is not really that much mitigation"...Also, Apocyphal can explicitly start throwing shit at us from outside the universe if we get strong enough, much less bootstrap things in it to become stronger, which I don't think a measly 2.5% will be enough to get to ignore.
Apo strives to make things interesting, not to kill us; so it quite possibly might start boosting him in certain situations. It would be a stretch to say that Apo mitigation directly nerfs Aobaru's Hunter, but it does lessen the threat of interference at least from that front.I'm still wondering whether Apocrypha is going to support the other Cursebearer against us. One the one hand he is a perfect material for empowerment, but on the other hand she promises an Apocryphal Onslaught if Aobaru dies. I'm getting mixed signals here! If she wants Aobaru to survive, why doesn't she let up on Hunger a bit?
IDK about leaving this realm at all. Tyrant is an active player; he will likely do something to make our life difficult, even if we take Adorie+our companions out of his reach.Well, theoretically the rebellion doesn't need to be finished now.
I'm still wondering whether Apocrypha is going to support the other Cursebearer against us. One the one hand he is perfect material for empowerment, but on the other hand she promises an Apocryphal Onslaught if Aobaru dies. I'm getting mixed signals here! If she wants Aobaru to survive, why doesn't she let up on Hunger a bit?
I mean there's an pretty easy way to help the hypothetical Cursebearer. Just let him kill Aobaru in exchange for helping us for the rest of his/her time in this universe. That should make Apocryphal onslaught survival and result in an awesome Cursebearer team up alongside probably numerous benefits from having another Progression-type with us.By the way, it's a bit funny to see Curses come into conflict like that. The Geas of the other Cursebearer wants Aobaru dead, Apocrypha will be upset if he dies, can't they just decide things among themselves before they involve poor Cursebearers? Hmm, alternatively, is there some kind of Geas mitigation that allows one to lose and skip a task without dying? We might want to help them acquire that somehow if we decide that they don't deserve death.
Let's ignore the character implications of betraying our squire after he heroically saved our hide for a moment and imagine the opposing Cursbearer agrees. Why in the world would we trust the other Cursebearer to stay instead of skipping worlds once the Onslaught becomes too much? His ride is always just a Geas call away.I mean there's an pretty easy way to help the hypothetical Cursebearer. Just let him kill Aobaru in exchange for helping us for the rest of his/her time in this universe. That should make Apocryphal onslaught survival and result in an awesome Cursebearer team up.
Should the world itself rise up against you, strike it down or so Accursed told us. So Why not do that with some help?
It will make him a person that is not actually good enough to compensate for his choices, the exact shape of which will probably be voted upon.Honest question here to you, and will, all the Tower Voters. If it turns out Hunger isn't that good, that he not only gambled with other people lives for no good reason but also failed, how do you feel like that reflects on him as a person?
I disagree, at least in Hunger's case. He doesn't simply not calculate or contemplate the risks, he simply takes his abilities into account and decides that those risks are not actually high enough to stop him from taking his course. And sure, his assessment of his capabilities might not be entirely accurate, but it's not entirely inaccurate either - he might very well be good enough to take the risks. It's a flaw, but an interesting and understandable one, and I feel like it reflects both Hunger's character and the decision-making process of the thread. Even when facing the consequences, we choose the most dangerous but the least assured option and bet we are good enough to handle it. I won't mind Hunger having such an opinion of himself, and I think that we can handle the interesting times it brings.Recklessness means you do not reckon, you to not calculate or contemplate, the consequences of your actions.
Let's ignore the character implications of betraying our squire after he heroically saved our hide for a moment and imagine the opposing Cursbearer agrees. Why in the world would we trust the other Cursebearer to stay instead of skipping worlds once the Onslaught becomes too much? His ride is always just a Geas call away.
And the point at which this becomes recklessness is the point where he stops calculating and starts assuming.I disagree, at least in Hunger's case. He doesn't simply not calculate or contemplate the risks, he simply takes his abilities into account and decides that those risks are not actually high enough to stop him from taking his course.
Dangerous words to mention, though I suppose we don't have a supremely capable previous incarnation to support that sort of confidence. ...We don't, right?
First, we may not want to evolve Hunger into the man that that man was.Dangerous words to mention, though I suppose we don't have a supremely capable previous incarnation to support that sort of confidence. ...We don't, right?
The Forebearer might be that incarnation.Dangerous words to mention, though I suppose we don't have a supremely capable previous incarnation to support that sort of confidence. ...We don't, right?