Huh, that is interesting. Do you mind if I ask about the color of your ice cream?I am a test subject, the faction color is a shade of blue. I hope that's true for everyone whose declared test subject so far...
... Really tempted to follow this, because scum being informed about the Town is a thing and it's matching up with my thoughts on ondine nearly all Day.Frankly I'm tired of the deflective bullshit and how exactly what I said earlier about Scum would claim town is being thrown back at my face casually. On top of that you keep evading the question, no, all you did is say I claim town and that everyone else has to die. You didn't claim Test subject, others leaked that. I think you've played along with IH's claim or at worst your scum with IH. Every turn you've tried to get whoever seems easiest to lynch and that included me once I started calling out your BS. I'm tired of this and I don't care much for your claim anymore unless you've got a power that basically GM confirms you in thread, I'm set on your lynch.
[X] Lynch Ondine
Sorry, you cut out?
There's a reason I've been feeling that ondine was just playing along with you, but maybe that's just because both of you were avoiding the subject like the plague.I think Ondine is legitimately a Test Subject- early on, you can see him figure out what I'm talking about or very plausibly fake it. Then they pushed along the same lines I was using for my initial claim.
Ondine almost certainly has access to a Test Subject role card, and I think is more likely to be a Test Subject than not.
It's not that I don't think you're town. (Though given the vague nature of the confirmation and the potential of scum havin enough information to put this together, I am far from certain you are). It is that you are voting to lynch somebody on Shadell's say so and a hunch. I'd much rather we didn't do that.I just want to point out that I gave the Test Subject wincon.
IH verified it.
I think biggerfish first said Test Subject.
And Shadell gave the blue color. Although the 3p thing still nags at me.
And yet! Everyone believes IH who verified me, but they don't believe me. How does this make any sense?
Hint hint, nudge nudge, I see. You got it buddy!You're just the easiest member of that group to pressure because you already have two votes on you, and if @-Rosen or @Nictis switch we'll be tied.
I'm pretty sure I'm missing context here.I don't like either of these lynches
If we're gonna vote ondine for voting on Shadell's call then we should be lynching Shadell.
Particularly I am much more suspicious of Shadell's act here than ondine's act here, because at least ondine's progression is apparent here.Essentially ondine swapped over to Cyri only after Shadell posted 578 acting like lynching Cyri was a set in stone thing, when it didn't even have a real wagon at the time.
This isn't true. I had been voting Cyri before. ffs.Essentially ondine swapped over to Cyri only after Shadell posted 578 acting like lynching Cyri was a set in stone thing, when it didn't even have a real wagon at the time.
That's why I said I'm not really suspicious of you for it, since you already had your progression beforehand. Shadell is the one who should be getting flak here, not you.I wasn't voting on her call. I had found Cyri suspicious.
This isn't true. I had been voting Cyri before. ffs.
Basically IH makes this post:
To which Shadell responds basically "So we're lynching Cyriccubed"...I think Ondine is legitimately a Test Subject- early on, you can see him figure out what I'm talking about or very plausibly fake it. Then they pushed along the same lines I was using for my initial claim.
Ondine almost certainly has access to a Test Subject role card, and I think is more likely to be a Test Subject than not.
It is not my preference, but I will switch to Shadell for self pres if Cyri and meso or nictis will as well.Particularly I am much more suspicious of Shadell's act here than ondine's act here, because at least ondine's progression is apparent here.
ondine has a progression before Shadell makes this post. It's a bad progression, but it's a progression nonetheless.Basically IH makes this post:
To which Shadell responds basically "So we're lynching Cyriccubed"...
and people just do with no further explanation.
It is a lack of reasoning that is the problem. @Cyricubed might very well be scum, but there has been no argument made to support that. He went from zero to four lynch votes in half a page with no discussion. That looks suspicious as hell, and if it isn't scummy, that's worse, since it suggests there is no underlying logic anybody can explain.@mesonoxian Sorry, can you try to lay out your reasoning in full?
Shadell has even less reasoning than ondine here pleaseIt is a lack of reasoning that is the problem. @Cyricubed might very well be scum, but there has been no argument made to support that. He went from zero to four lynch votes in half a page with no discussion. That looks suspicious as hell, and if it isn't scummy, that's worse, since it suggests there is no underlying logic anybody can explain.