Please, please don't put our best psychic researcher in danger. She won't even have that much of an impact, she's our relatively worst combat grandmaster facing off against enemies she's bad at countering.
Please, please don't put our best psychic researcher in danger. She won't even have that much of an impact, she's our relatively worst combat grandmaster facing off against enemies she's bad at countering.
Ah, I thought that the big battle happens in Y4 for some reason.I don't think it works like that.. The major battle is on Y3, that's why the options for deploying the psykers are for Y3.
So are Shocktroopers, which would benefit far more from Powered Armor, though they cost much more. Scouts are only 7 years.
The benefits to psyker hunting are minimal and it takes over two decades. We expect a lot of Munitorum work soon, after the battle. Not just replenishing losses, but also Implementing Harvesters.I'd like to start getting the anti-psyker training done. It's quite evident that we're going to need it now that Lin is gone.
A lot of war is hurry up and wait, so I would not be surprised if we could... @Durin ?I don't think we can do Readiness Training with our fleets already deployed an in active battle.
We know what we want to pay them with, its technology. We want to know what else they have to offer for it other than hive construction help, not what else we could pay them with.-Y4: Ask the Trolls what they would want in exchange for assissting in Mining and/or helping with our Chaos Psyker problem.
Nothing whatsoever for the Shadow War? Seems very unwise.Arbites
SLOT A - Year 1
-Y1-Y4: Greater Psyker Hunting
SLOT B - Year 1
-Y1-Y4: Greater Psyker Hunting
No divination spared for the Shadow War? No, I will not vote for this.-Y1: Greater Divination (Hive Fleet Grabakr)
-Y2: Greater Divination (Hive Fleet Grabakr)
She is our best researches and worst heroic psyker. Bad idea.
No divination spared for the Shadow War? No, I will not vote for this.
Why not put 4 Counterintel? DD'ing Greater Psyker Hunting is basically a 20% of a +16, basically a +2.4 vs Beta+ Psykers on average. CounterIntel/Greater Psyker Hunting every turn is the most optimal configuration.SLOT A - Year 1
-Y1-Y4: Greater Psyker Hunting
SLOT B - Year 1
-Y1-Y3: Greater Psyker Hunting
-Y4: Counter-Intelligence
Well, hopefully it's possible. I could maybe vote for a plan without a divination, but it would need 4 Counterintels.My question about Divination: Attacks is relevant to this. If we can do that, then I can put a shadow war Greater Divination in Year 4.
But the more divination we have for Ridcully helping the campaign in the first two years, the better position we'll be in the later years.
Why not put 4 Counterintel? DD'ing Greater Psyker Hunting is basically a 20% of a +16, basically a +2.4 vs Beta+ Psykers on average. CounterIntel/Greater Psyker Hunting every turn is the most optimal configuration.
I agree that we need to put more effort towards countering the shadow war.
I would point out honestly, that we kinda already have the nids beat on SOME level because even if we crit-fail this upcoming battle, we just call in a Honorbound favor and eldar-nuke them out of existence.
but I don't think we will be able to eldar-nuke our shipyards being bombed, our hero units or research-people assasinated or our tech stolen (I could totally see the conservatives trying to off tranth or (not sure which would be better for them, worse for us and thus more likely?), our progressive admech leader)
....once that happens its DONE, nothing the eldar can do after-the-fact so no honorbound favor can fix it.
thus, I suggest that our home-based efforts should focus on countering the conservative terrorists (cas you know they won't fight us in a honest battle that they would undoubtedly lose) AND countering the alpha-agents.
I disagree, I do not think it is a exaggeration.While I'm fine with putting effort towards the shadow wars, let's not exaggerate the problems those will cause.
I firmly support this @Enjou the Primaris project is a big deal for the sane.@Enjou What do you think of the idea of switching the last diplomacy action to sending all of the data Maximal has on Psyker/warp genetics to Secondus so that Cawl can get his hands on it? As has been mentioned before Cawl gaining our advanced warp/psyker genetic knowledge which has been noted to be way ahead of all the other human polities due to living on Avernus and studying the wildlife. Seeing as the Astartes are largely build around that it seems like it could seriously speed up his research which would be great for everyone since they can share.
That and Cawl may be interested enough to consider learning from Maximal himself or outright moving to Avernus if he believes he can benefit from the research here.
Y1-Y2: Lizardmen Diplomacy (Both) - Ask for help with the Psyker Problem, renegotiate trade agreement.
It might be a good idea to ask if any of the lizardmen want to fight on Hvergelmir as well. After all, the weapon enchanting thing the saurus do does depend on Veterancy.-Y1-Y2: Lizardmen Diplomacy (Both) - Ask for help with the Psyker Problem, renegotiate trade agreement.
It has been pointed out repeatedly that the people of Avernus do not like the idea of leaving Avernus. Especially the guardian races since they have a direct duty to Avernus itself.It might be a good idea to ask if any of the lizardmen want to fight on Hvergelmir as well. After all, the ability of the saurus do depend on Veterancy.
I wonder when Avernus will decide to unleash its forces? like, its cool and all that they are building up. but its going to do nothing if it holds onto its chips so long that the galaxy falls into the warp or the orks take over or whatever apolapse happens.It has been pointed out repeatedly that the people of Avernus do not like the idea of leaving Avernus. Especially the guardian races since they have a direct duty to Avernus itself.