Non-Canon Omake: "Go to Chicago."
"Go to Chicago." "Head for Chicago." "If you're still looking for America, go to Chicago."

Ten thousand mouths found a hundred thousand ears, the idea bouncing from person to person throughout the ruined Midwest. It wound its way through the caravans on the interstates to the traders who'd visit the ramshackle bunker towns to the children of crying, desperate parents. It shot outwards along I-90 to Toledo, I-94 to Detroit and from Milwaukee, I-65 to Indianopolis, I-55 to Springfield, and I-88 to Des Moines.

Many came from the caravans of people, roaming for a place to stay. Some came in what vehicles somehow still worked, roaring in from Reno to the west, while others fainted on the doorstep, walking all the way from Chatanooga to the south. The tramp of feet heading to Chicago never died out.

The Russians disappeared entire caravans. The Victorians whispered about the disease ridden city, and sent technicals every so often to capture individuals, never to be seen again. Yet still, they came.

They came young, infants swaddled by mothers who weren't theirs. They came old, and fell in ramshackle graves by the road side, buried next to the victims of the plague. Every day in the morning, you could hear the tramping of feet, and every day in the evening you could hear the chatter and see the fires. Where Kevin the coyote, driving Alysa from Reno, would chat with Leah from Louisville about how much a good tomato was worth. Where Jackson the ex-governor sat down with Hope the orphan to talk about the future of America. Where Captain Taylor finally found out where his old Master Sargeant lay, from Lieutenant Nicholas, the only survivor of his unit.

They came to Chicago, where America would find itself again.


-Opening narration to Reforging of America, the second movie in the trilogy America.

Larry Zenoulke, Reforging of America, produced by Iowa City Productions. 2103.
 
I have an idea. What if instead of arguing about the nitty gritty details of how our economy will work we just go full total war economy and 100% militarized society until all our enemies are broken before us, and THEN we decide what the post-war government and economy will look like?
Because the internal politics and structure of the city-state will affect what the city state is capable of during the war, and what options are and aren't on the menu for its government, and what some of the options that are on the menu will cost.

If we voted for a Marxist-Leninist vanguard communist state running a command economy, we'd have certain advantages (easy to transition to war mobilization) and disadvantages (whole economy coordinated by bureaucrats that sometimes fuck up).

If we voted for a clone of the early 21st century American economic order, we'd have different advantages (probably, to be fair, faster innovation and efficient resource allocation to problems someone is spending money on) and disadvantages (lots of powerful owners whose interests may not align with the state).

So we can't just say "let's do full war mobilization and total war" and leave it at that.

Another issue is that we're almost certainly not ready to fight Victoria until AFTER a prolonged buildup period, possibly a generation-long one. We're starting out from a position of weakness, with multiple layers of challenges to overcome before taking down the 'final boss.' That's just the nature of things.

I propose that gun training be mandatory by age 20. For everyone. And everyone also gets a rifle.
Infantry training, or just gun training?

Because 100 hours of gun training plus a thousand hours of infantry training is likely to make better soldiers than the other way around. The problem with that is, well, the problem with universal involuntary conscription.

I am in new jersey. If I'm still alive then I'm probably in the resistance. But probably not, I'm jewish.
You know, I don't think the Victorians actually kill Jews, though I'm quite sure they'll cheerfully stand by while others do so. Honestly you're more likely to be dead from sheer superannuation; remember that it's the year 2074.
 
We also shouldn't go FULL WAR MOBILIZATION NOW because then we're just replacing one dictatorship with what is likely a military junta.
 
People need hope. Something to believe in.

An army with a state attached plunged into endless industrial and military mobilization under the cruel regime of the gun isnt that.

A new, free world where peace is matched with freedom and prosperity is.

Offer people a voice and a stake in the new world and they'll move mountains which slave armies would never be able to even reach.
 
Last edited:
People need hope. Something to believe in.

An army with a state attached plunged into endless industrial and military mobilization under the cruel regime of the gun isnt that.

A new, free world where peace is matched with freedom and prosperity is.

Offer people a voice and a stake in the new world and they'll move mountains which slave armies would never be able to even reach.
I see literally nobody saying we enslave people.
 
I suppose, but if its that or to few troops to stop anyone from fucking us up, then sacrifices will have to made. They at least will be paid.

If I understand correctly, the point AKuz is making is that that's a false dichotomy - if we give our people an aspirational goal, they'll fill the ranks out of conviction with no compulsion required.
 
If I understand correctly, the point AKuz is making is that that's a false dichotomy - if we give our people an aspirational goal, they'll fill the ranks out of conviction with no compulsion required.
I mean, it'll make some people enlist, which is a given, but that won't always be the case, were a new nation that is extremely short in legitimacy and strength. I can't imagine any aspiration that would allow us to fill the ranks fast enough to be useful.
Were just another pretender to the throne of America after all.
 
Are things like conscription things that should be decided in a constitution or should they be decided on normal bills we vote on? Not everything needs to be decided in a constitution. Constitutions are meant to be loose but firm frameworks for a country's laws. Constitutions are meant to ideally enshrine and protect the most important values and most vital structures of the government while allowing enough flexibility in a changing world. Is a position on conscription important enough to stick almost permanently in a constitution or it is something we may change over time in the normal process?
 
Last edited:
Okay, I think this works, but I'm exhausted now. I'm going to touch this up in the morning and see if I can remember whatever it is I'm convinced that I've forgotten to include. See you, folks.
 
I wonder if my write-in will be included?!?? :V

I think it's an outsider, but maybe in with a punchers chance.
 
Last edited:
Guys! I found it! Our anthem.

BEHOLD



You know, the Battle Cry of Freedom is rather fitting, beyond Kaiserreich memes. The original songwriter was a strong advocate of abolitionism. The lyrics were written to be palatable to all the factions of the North. And of course, the Union will continue on, despite adversity. We will make it so.

Down with the traitors. Up with the stars.
 
Back
Top