Apparently Dwyer's book paints him as a tyrant, while Napoleon: A Life by Andrew Roberts is more ambiguous, praising and criticizing Napoleon in equal measure. I haven't read Dwyer's book though.
The French painter declares
I love this so much.
This is how I picture Hachiman in a (hypothetical) Napoleon/Oregairu crossover, in which he is a naval officer in the French military; wearing a green uniform and carrying a British Baker rifle and a cutlass.
as he shows off his portrait of you
We now live in an age where anyone could just instantly create an image of anything. Imagine being in an era where images could take hours to make.
your own youthful features and unruly mane
I'm smiling so much...he was only in his early twenties, and already his ambition soared so high.
your own self-pride no less obvious than the painter's
"Got everything money can buy...except what it can't."
And now I'm imagining Napoleon becoming a boxer.
you think over why you even wanted the rank in the first place
Military.
Just one word, but it says so much, doesn't it?
In my opinion, Napoleon Bonaparte is the best military commander who ever lived.
That does not mean he was unbeatable, nor that he was incapable of making mistakes.
He is the very last person in history to have a combination of complete political power, ruling a mighty empire, and a frontline military genius.
There hasn't been anyone like him since.
You've always known you were destined for great things
Without chaos, whence come heroes?
I wonder what Napoleon would think of Cao Cao (styled Mengde).
By the way, my favorite character/historical figure of the Three Kingdoms period is Sima Yi (styled Zhongda).
to help increase the influence of your mother and the rest of your family
Of all his siblings, Lucien was apparently the most talented, but also the most unpredictable; he was a wildcard.
Joseph was a skilled diplomat, but that was it; he had no business being a governor, much less a King.
Louis actually turned out to be a good King in Holland, and is still fondly remembered in the Netherlands to this day. Napoleon's treatment and eventual ousting of him was despicable in my opinion.
Jerome was a complete idiot.
By the way, Jerome's first wife -
Elizabeth Patterson - is in my opinion a waifu.
Jerome threw her and his son away like they were nothing, at Napoleon's behest.
This only made me roll my eyes and think of
Admiral Yi of Korea.
A military genius. One of the best naval commanders of all time.
And a goddamn fool.
I'm sorry, but that's my opinion of him.
Why the bloody hell didn't he launch a coup?
Sod duty, I say. Look after yourself and the people you care about. That's it.
You owe it to the people here to help keep them safe
"I shit on the people, and what they want and what they're ready for."
Being known as a man of duty increases your popularity
I dunno, Tjf...but I'm a cynic. I don't have a lot of faith in human nature.
"If you wish to be a success in the world, promise everything, deliver nothing."
- Napoleon
(looks at France) That country is honestly really weird. I say again; it was in France that modern democracy was born.
France protests.
"Hi, my name is Luis..."
as long as you keep being seen as fulfilling that duty
Tsar Alexander the Second implemented reforms in Russia.
He encouraged Finnish nationalism and autonomy (the Finns refer to him as 'The Good Tsar'. Even now, with everything that is happening, a statue of him still stands in Helsinki)
And he is responsible for the emancipation of the serfs. He ended serfdom in Russia.
The Russian people thanked him by murdering him.
It's a fascinating topic for me; this veneration of despotic rulers (Stalin still gets flowers placed on his grave to this day) while disliking or despising the reformist ones.
"Being a victim of evil can actually make it harder to see what was done to you as evil, rather than easier. Hence the Russian practice of remembering Stalin as a great leader."
- Vlad Vexler
"Hoorah! Hoorah for the Tsar!"
By the way, in my opinion, the Russian Army in the 1700s and 1800s was capable and dangerous.
Victories over Sweden.
Victories over the Ottomans.
And yes, they suffered defeats to the French at Austerlitz and Friedland, but ultimately they prevailed in the Napoleonic Wars and marched all the way to Paris.
(looks at the Russian Navy) ...that one on the other hand, for some reason, has
always been bad. I don't know why.
Ever since your childhood, you've burned with an inexhaustible energy
"You do any terrifying thing you're asked to do but you have to do it running...the only thing that really scares you guys is stillness."
I've read the book Vengeance by Juval Aviv.
When 'Avner' (it's really Juval himself) asked his handler why he was chosen to lead the 5-man team, the handler told him that they picked him because he is stubborn and determined; he is the sort of person who just keeps going no matter what.
The painter, a youth of around your own tender age of 22
Arguably the most famous painter of this era is
Jacques-Louis David.
little has changed since then
Without a large and growing middle class, you cannot expect much economic growth or social, cultural or even political development in a society.
In my opinion, in Planetos in A Song of Ice and Fire, it would make more sense for the first Republic to be created in Essos, not Westeros. I find it more likely that Essos conquers Westeros instead of the other way around.
Italy.
A country with so much history, whose actions and decisions shaped the entire world.
support a restoration of the monarchy...strong supporters of the Revolution
Napoleon making himself Emperor of the French (and King of Italy) as well as making his own siblings monarchs was a means of him trying to balance the ideals of the Revolution with the old ways of absolute monarchy.
It didn't work.
No matter what he did, the champions of the old ways never stopped trying to bring him down.
However, the legacy he left behind didn't die. It was not forgotten by the people of Europe.
1848: The Year of Revolutions
reject both sides, despising all Frenchmen as foreign occupiers
In my opinion, Paoli was not a man who was true to his beliefs.
In real life he handed over the island to the British.
some behave like arrogant prigs
Of course they do! They are
French.
You're a revolutionary among revolutionaries
In real life, Napoleon was a Jacobin. Though it is clear that he was very much a pragmatist. The man himself said that he adopts the religion of whatever society he is presently in.
the creation of a new, brighter world, where all men are equal, and tyranny will be wiped away by the march of progress
At the People's Will.
You might be a moderate, wanting to keep France a constitutional monarchy
This was what Germaine de Stael wanted. But she also was an admirer of Talleyrand, so I don't think her judgment was all that acute.
Napoleon in real life was very much an authoritarian dictator...but he was weird.
Napoleon: (reforms currency, improves education and infrastructure, introduces central banking, reduces corruption, creates a civil code)
Me: "Wait, that's not what dictators are supposed to do."
Napoleon: (takes away women's rights)
Me: "Ah, that's more like it."
By the way, here's a video in Sam Aronow's Jewish History series (I'm way behind on that series. My next episode to watch is The Russian Haskalah (1815-1856)):
Napoleon's Sanhedrin (1797-1815)
I love the ending of
this video. EMANCIPATION AT THE END OF A GUN.
Some of the fiercest and most loyal soldiers in Napoleon's Grande Armee were Polish.
bringing France to the precipice of disaster
From the National Assembly to the National Convention to the Committee of Public Safety to the Directory, the handling of the French economy was
terrible. I wanted to tear at my hair while reading about it.
Then Napoleon became First Consul and
within a week he stabilized the French currency.
You might be a conservative
"There are people who claim to be conservative, but they do not want to conserve anything. They want to destroy. They are fake conservatives."
- Vlad Vexler
stability and order are the guiding principles of your life
"A civilization based on the principles of absolute order and uncompromising discipline."
(looks up) That is so Prussian. 'An army with a state.'
Genuinely don't care. Ideology only has meaning insofar as it can sway people to follow you
Me: (points) "You. I like you."
You porco! I'll show you, coglione!
"Us, our blood runs hot. Because our hearts are big."
In my opinion, Giuseppe "Joe" Masseria was a greedy pig. He refused to share New York; he wanted it all for himself. And that's why he lost it all in the end.
Luciano on the other hand became one of the founding fathers of
The Commission, which in my opinion seems similar to the Balance of Power in Europe.
you watch, a little incredulous, as one draws a knife from his boot
Never, ever underestimate how stupid people can be. Assume incompetence first before assuming deliberate malice.
Apparently the Bengal Famine was more due to incompetence than to outright genocidal intent (though it is true that Churchill was a racist and imperialist. And a moron. Yes, he was an important and pivotal figure in terms of Britain's political stance in the Second World War. However, when it came to the actual running of the war itself, he was an incompetent and drunken idiot. It's like a CEO who can make rousing speeches to inspire and motivate the employees, but for the love of God, keep him away from the actual managing of the company)
The other, backing away a few steps, pulls a pistol from his waistband and pulls the hammer to full cock
STOP FIGHTING.
the shooter...falling to the ground, dead
In my opinion he deserved to die just for being that stupid. Trigger discipline, moron!
I absolutely love what happens next. The young Bonaparte brother will make himself known here. It also made me think of Napoleon successfully bluffing Austrian soldiers into believing he had troops nearby when in reality he didn't.