Carrnage
Human
- Location
- New Zealand
he's also spec op's so he's likely got some training in it.
he's also spec op's so he's likely got some training in it.
So lets see we have:
As possible approaches to determine guard levels. All have arguments for and against them. So I think we're at the point where you decide, as the GM, which system you like best.
- Guards per Area
- Guards as Percentage of Staff
- Absolute Guard Numbers
The conclusions for all three are that, even going by my 12 guards-per-team proposal which is the lowest of the two estimates (I think you and @UberJJK were assuming 20?), our Mindoir campus has as many or more guards per employee, per square meter, and on an absolute basis than a post 9/11 nuclear power plant, plus the Barracks with the ready-reaction force that I've never heard of a nuclear power plant even considering. I'm assuming we currently qualify for Guards Everywhere, and if not we can hire another 5 teams next quarter and be certain of it.Hmm... well the first to are better. The last is simpler. There clearly should be some sort of consideration for size of the place. What are the conclusions for the first two again?
Please consider that few 9/11 nuclear power plants have to consider the possible issue that's a full on assault with military equipment, up to and including naval artillery.
That's why they have power armor.Please consider that few 9/11 nuclear power plants have to consider the possible issue that's a full on assault with military equipment, up to and including naval artillery.
We don't either; that's what the SA cruiser flotilla is for.Please consider that few 9/11 nuclear power plants have to consider the possible issue that's a full on assault with military equipment, up to and including naval artillery.
The whole "we hold the orbitals, now you are our bitches" thing only works if the attackers don't care about collateral damage. Most forces that would attack overtly will go for capture, not kill.
Hmm... well the first to are better. The last is simpler. There clearly should be some sort of consideration for size of the place. What are the conclusions for the first two again?
Please consider that few 9/11 nuclear power plants have to consider the possible issue that's a full on assault with military equipment, up to and including naval artillery.
*During Special Operations Training*
Instructor: "Okay. The scenario is as follows; Alliance Intelligence has located a Turian command post with data on their strategic maneuvers across the sector and what we suspect to be invasion plans for Terra Nova as a prelude to an all out war. Your mission is to retrieve this data. This must be done with the utmost secrecy. If the Turians find out it would almost trigger an invasion before we're prepared and likely draw the Asari and Salarians into the fighting. Understood?"
Shepard: "Yes sir!"
*Later*
Instructor: "Shepard! What the hell was that!!?"
Shepard: "Me retrieving the data sir!"
Instructor: "And how exactly was slaughtering your way through the base in anyway stealthy!!!!????"
Shepard: "Sir. I ensured that there were no survivors and erased all digital and forensic evidence of my presence sir."
Instructor: "Son. I know you had a bit of a rough upbringing jumping from ship to ship. But detonating the bases fusion reactor is not in the least bit covert!!!!!!"
My Shepard found that you could easily penetrate any location stealthily by killing everyone and hacking everything. If only you could nuke every base upon leaving like Virmire. /sigh.
Ramirez, Shepard, and Saren walk into a bar. No bar left.And Saren was The Council's youngest and longest serving Turian Spectre, 24 years as a Spectre is a long time, on top of been considered one of their very best.
All this goes to show that killing everyone then obliterating the place to remove all evidence is not only a perfectly valid solution to covert work but an extreamly successful one.
I'm more worried about Benezia deciding its better to remove us and our game changing technology from the equation entirely then I am about someone hiring Thane to kill us.
We can even make him a super tuxedo so they can be effective and classy at their job.
It's Saren/Shepard!Subtle,I dunno, 'obliterated by orbital bombardment' doesn't exactly seem subtle to me, and the SA will be very, very interested in finding out who did it, as would most of Citadel space because they are getting most of the neat toys we make as well after the SA has gone through vetting through things.
We should give one to each of our bodyguards. Also badass sunglasses fully equipped with a heads-up display, mini-camera and data uplink.We can even make him a super tuxedo so they can be effective and classy at their job.
It's Saren/Shepard!Subtle,
More seriously, it's like that Terminus Frigate that just tried offing us...not stealthy, but still not traceable. If Benezia doesn't have the resources to set up a disguised freighter (rigged to vaporize once the job is done) with a MAC and VI to assist the single suicide pilot, I'll eat my hat.
We should give one to each of our bodyguards. Also badass sunglasses fully equipped with a heads-up display, mini-camera and data uplink.