I had a match in a Marceau where I, towards the end, parked my Marceau behind an island and made like 8 fires on a Colombo. That was pure cancer.
Clearly your best isn't sufficient for them
My problem generally is some people just don't want to listen. Even when I'm the FC and telling them something, some try to interpret it in the most stupid way imaginable. Like playcing yourself broadside behind an island so that you can only sail out broadside into enemy guns. Or sailing out broadside and then sitting still. And then they tell me when I tell them to not do that "it's ok!".
I had several Ranked battles where I was doing close to 120K damage, one, in particular, resulted in a loss because a single Montana decided that camping the back of the map spamming HE was the best course of action.Clearly your best isn't sufficient for them
No, but actually: even if you're playing in the srs bns tiers of Clan Battles, you can always improve. I need to work on my Moskva routing, for example. My positioning's a bit greedy, and that cost two close games against hurricane tier teams last night. My aim's fineish, but I can do a better job of hitting Italian BBs. My micro-level movement also needs a bit of work. Stuff like this – if you don't know where you can improve, that's the first problem. After every loss, there's always a brief fault-free discussion of what could've gone better for the team. It's calm, and the focus is on what could've improved strategically. This is how you improve.
If you want to *stop* getting stat-shamed, you have two solutions:
1. Git gud (see above)
2. Turn off chat
The game's community has its toxic bits. The question is if you ignore the toxicity (and shrug it off) or if you take the hard route of "getting better".
Your goal then, should be to make 120 closer to an "average" result, instead of an exceptional result.
Yeah, that's the mindset difference. You either have the mindset to improve, or you… don't. Of course, there's degrees, but there's also a fundamental difference between the two.
Well if the enemy battleship is angled towards you HE is the better choice to constantly make damage. Same for killing DD's (Expert Loader says hi) or for BB's that really want to use HE like Conqueror or Thunderer (but Thunderer AP is really good too).
Well, it's critiqued because the later hybrids (Kearsarge) are pretty powerful. And they provide their own spotting, which is generally not a good thing for a team-driven game.
Thunderer AP is amazing.
I've got a ship I actually really like and thought I do well in a hair below 40% with Fuso. Noone is a universally good player, and some ships also just suck. I've got a bunch of other ships with poor win rates too, including all three of the T10 battleships I actually played a significant number of random battles with (though that is in good part because I haven't played those in randoms for ages).
blog.worldofwarships.com
Any chance you want to stop exaggerating?Can somebody please explain me this?
Closed test 0.11.1, new ships
Japanese cruiser Maya, American aircraft carriers Hornet and Yorktown, as well as two new superships - british aircraft carrier Eagle and American air
What stuff is WG on that they think aircraft that are literally almost as fast as shells are a good idea? That are so fast you won't have enough time for flak to even activate?
I'll stop exaggerating when WG stops doing shit things like this when CV's handled by a competent player dominate every game anyway already.
They're already supposed to come into random battles like the other's already did to my knowledge.
The number of competent players that dominate the game is a minority.
That doesn't change the fact that the impact ceiling for CV's is too high anyway and with this the CV gets even more ridiculous. Balancing your game is about the average player has an average intelligence and works to improve his gameplay to make better use of his ship. Not potatoes that know how to do one thing only and that only barely.
Must have missed that one. Just checked in-game, you can't queue superships in randoms yet but apparently that will be added in 0.11. Now that would be a problem.
