- Location
- Caracas
Yes, but that's 12 months, 365 days, 8760 hours.In the first episode, wasn't it pretty explicitly a single year?
For someone who does not sleeps, a year is a long time.
Yes, but that's 12 months, 365 days, 8760 hours.In the first episode, wasn't it pretty explicitly a single year?
Edit, nvm! It is M/M and that already ticks a box for De recs.
And what is the context, in your opinion?Loving all these knee jerk reactions from people that are ignoring the context so they can feel indignant.
Loving all these knee jerk reactions from people that are ignoring the context so they can feel indignant.
This, in the very comment you lot are quoting. This is the context you are ignoring so you can be mad.Disclaimer:
I have no problem with homosexual relationships, or homosexuals in general. What I do have a problem is when an author changes someone's sexual orientation for the sake of their ship. Which is what this feels like from the tags.
However, I will give it a full read.
Doing something homophobic and then say ing "but guys I'm not being homophobic" doesn't actually make the first thing not count, you realize?This, in the very comment you lot are quoting. This is the context you are ignoring so you can be mad.
While Duncan managed to say it in possibly the worst way I could think of, pretty sure the point is that they were saying "M/M in this case is a point towards dereccing for me because I dislike changing the canon orientation of characters to facilitate a ship". Personally, I'll admit the same that changing character orientations from straight to gay for a story tends to at least get a raised eyebrow - though certainly less so when it's been pointed out to me in the past that it's entirely possible for a character to be bi and it to just not come up in the original text. I won't even begin to pretend changing someone's sexual orientation from straight to otherwise is in the same ballpark as doing the opposite, but I think it can absolutely still be a valid personal peeve against a fic without being homophobic.Doing something homophobic and then say ing "but guys I'm not being homophobic" doesn't actually make the first thing not count, you realize?
I suppose I'm a bit sensitive because of how many times I've seen "I don't mind gays, but don't put them in my fic," ya know? If @Duncan Idaho wants to clarify, that's fi ne, but what they actually posted was pretty shitty.While Duncan managed to say it in possibly the worst way I could think of, pretty sure the point is that they were saying "M/M in this case is a point towards dereccing for me because I dislike changing the canon orientation of characters to facilitate a ship". Personally, I'll admit the same that changing character orientations from straight to gay for a story tends to at least get a raised eyebrow - though certainly less so when it's been pointed out to me in the past that it's entirely possible for a character to be bi and it to just not come up in the original text. I won't even begin to pretend changing someone's sexual orientation from straight to otherwise is in the same ballpark as doing the opposite, but I think it can absolutely still be a valid personal peeve against a fic without being homophobic.
checks pairings is it friendship or M/M?
Edit, nvm! It is M/M and that already ticks a box for De recs.
Disclaimer:
I have no problem with homosexual relationships, or homosexuals in general. What I do have a problem is when an author changes someone's sexual orientation for the sake of their ship. Which is what this feels like from the tags.
However, I will give it a full read.
Yeah, but he didn't derec it. He just said the M/M pairing was a warning sign. Then he proceeds to say he's going to read the entire thing anyway.Didn't we agree you have to actually read a fic before you can rec or derec it? Not just derec based on your prejudices and/or the summary?
This, in the very comment you lot are quoting. This is the context you are ignoring so you can be mad.
what context am i missing for "I'm dereccing this because it has gays in it" exactly
what stunning context makes this not obviously repulsive
So what? Like, granting for the sake of argument that you are correct about @Duncan Idaho 's motivations, their post was bad enough that they absolutely deserved to get hit for it. Why are you rushing to excuse homophobia?It's possible that Duncan is a homophobe with a stunning lack of awareness in their posting, but speaking as the guy who recc'd the fic in the first place I find it more likely that they are opposed for the same reason that I often pre-emptively ignore fics for this kind of thing.
Look at something as wonderful as 'Our Dreams At Dusk' by Yuhki Kamatani (an xgender asexual) and how that deals with LGBT+ experiences. Now look at the average BL manga (and their author) and tell me they have even the slightest thing in common. Yaoi is the literary equivalent of lesbian pornography and is exactly as respectful. Yaoi is also what the overwhelming majority of M/M fics on AO3 are, being written by straight (so painfully straight that they usually default to writing gay men with one coded female and one coded male) girls for other straight girls.
While there is also a rather wonderful thread of queer fiction on AO3, it's drowned out by the yaoi tide and it's pretty understandable to be turned off by the latter. I wouldn't have gone so far as to pre-emptively derec before reading, but when Kate09 posted all those links last page there's a reason I didn't click on several of them.
He did, he later changed his mind about it, but he did de-rec it, and got interacted for it.
Oh it definitely can be something other than homophobic, although "the story mentions a gay relationship" is all you need to know to de-rec it it becomes a lot harder to argue that it's not homophobic, but I'll grant it's still quite possible.Gotta love the conga line of people thinking that, no, really, "having gays when the canon didn't is just a peeve of mine" can be not homophobic.
he isn't. He's explaining why he isn't rushing to see homophobia when there are other explanations.
Oh, so that's what it takes?While there is also a rather wonderful thread of queer fiction on AO3, it's drowned out by the yaoi tide and it's pretty understandable to be turned off by the latter.
People can have preferences.[STOP]
Derecing a fic in this manner (that is, because it contains a M/M pairing) is a violation of Rule Two: Don't Be Hateful. As such, you have been given a 25 point infraction and a three day threadban.
[/STOP]
Yeah... Sounds like reading into it and assuming 'you don't like it and dared to mention it, hateful!'.Disclaimer:
I have no problem with homosexual relationships, or homosexuals in general. What I do have a problem is when an author changes someone's sexual orientation for the sake of their ship. Which is what this feels like from the tags.
However, I will give it a full read.
Furthermore, please do not continue this derail. There will be no more warnings if staff have to come in here again over this.We have a robust appeals process. If you think the staff were wrong in a decision they made, or you believe they have treated you inappropriately, the appropriate response is to file an appeal. Attempts to respond to staff doing their jobs in a thread - whether that's saying thanks, grandstanding, or arguing with, or complaining about, the staff decision - just disrupts a thread further and makes life more difficult for everyone.
I love the quest, but I'm not sure one could call it one of the best fics ever. While it has great characters and moments, its pacing and ability to hold arcs together well is substantially hindered by the quest structure and mechanics. The old "there are a bunch of things that voters have voted to do in this 'turn' and need to be shown in writing" problem that such quests tend to fall into is absolutely prevalent here, and this kind of simulationism reduces the smoothness of the narrative. We might also note elements such as the way we were allowed to largely fail to engage with the world and just cultivate our way to security are significant narrative flaws, with the Renshu "arc" in particular suffering (it is being rewritten and is much better in the RoyalRoad version, but that isn't complete). The entire back 20% of the quest from ~weeks 40 to 50 has very little happen and the pacing slows to a crawl.With the thread reopened here's a completed quest that I think fits on the list Forge of Destiny(Xianxia Quest) Original - Fantasy
It is a Xianxia, but one that follows the slow progression of power and character development, not jumping to the MC getting world breaking power. The Quest follows Ling Qi, a street rat who was identified as having the potential to become a powerful cultivator and offered a scholarship to learn how to do so in exchange for military service and her learning to become a cultivator and growing both in power and as a person.
The Quest is complete and a sequel in process. While it is also being edited into a proper, publishable, story but I think even the quest form is worth considering for the list.