Sir_Travelsalot
Never wakes up tired.
- Location
- At Home
I thought we'd come to a consensus on the Donnager being our contribution to warships, at least the first one to focus on?
My vehicle is more in the fighter class than capital ships, care to take a guess.I thought we'd come to a consensus on the Donnager being our contribution to warships, at least the first one to focus on?
Fun little idea for us to develop for the Galactic Civil war for the rebels. I give all you guys a hint it's nickname is the "mobile coffin" and it's accuracy is said to be so poor that the only time it hit anything was when it was kicked into Jim. Wink wink, nudge, nudge.
Ps. The most recognizable feature on a tanuki.
I know, I was just using the common stereotype for my hints. Also it's variants such as the mine layer and civilian worker variant could be quite a sight to see. Also have a 🍪😊The RB-79 was actually very decent, its just that it was deployed poorly and most of the men who piloted it were freshly and rushly trained.
You mean the star wars lesser cousin to Mass Effects Thresher Maw's? I would rather we use a name that's simple and reflects on the model variant of the hull series.In any case, since we're making the Hull-C, I'd been thinking of what name to give it that would fit in-universe. I propose we name it after the Exogorth, those ginormous asteroid worms, one of which was big enough that the Millenium Falcon fit in its mouth. Thoughts?
I think we may do the hull a first since the contract is for a light freighter.In any case, since we're making the Hull-C, I'd been thinking of what name to give it that would fit in-universe. I propose we name it after the Exogorth, those ginormous asteroid worms, one of which was big enough that the Millenium Falcon fit in its mouth. Thoughts?
I don't have a problem with them.
There isn't. I like a good discussion but if you're sure what you want, its okay.
It will when they start looking for Sith connections. And anti-jedi doesn't mean pro-sith the opposite in fact. As far as the galaxy is concerned the Jedi and the Sith are the same thing just a religious cult that has started multiple wars all the time.[X] Vulkan Frame
[X] Normal
[X] "He was a Sith Lord, born on Temaris. He united our world under his banner and forced the pirates out, which used the Republic's weakness. He capitulated to the Jedi in the end – to spare his homeworld from further damage in the wars. That's why we were allowed to keep the name."
Good plan also anti jedi sentiment is on the rise. Also considering that the jedi barely ever leave that temple of theirs is see no problem with having a sith name.
*Looks over at Darth Vectivus*
All that is confirmed is that he existed. He isn't known whether he was as good as the Sith Lady trying to turn a powerful apprentice to her side said. Also any Sith that actually follow the Sith teachings are monsters. The Sith philosophy is toxic.*Looks over at Darth Vectivus*
It's hardly unprecedented to have Sith who aren't puppy kicking evil. Just because they're rarer than hen's teeth doesn't mean it can't happen.
When did we get to arguing about Sith being good? My point was its entirely possible to not constantly act like a saturday morning cartoon villain and still be a Sith. Besides, from the brief description it sounded like Temaris wasn't even part of any Sith domain, just had a native darksider take it over, unify it, and then surrendered to the Republic. Would hardly be uncharacteristic of Jedi to name someone a Sith for using the Dark Side.All that is confirmed is that he existed. He isn't known whether he was as good as the Sith Lady trying to turn a powerful apprentice to her side said. Also any Sith that actually follow the Sith teachings are monsters. The Sith philosophy is toxic.
It would because the Sith are not the only Darksiders around. And the Jedi are not stupid they wouldn't name someone a Sith if they weren't one. And no you really can't be a real Sith and not be a monster. At that point you are nothing more than an imposter that got lucky because the actual Sith were too busy to kill you or you are just barely got any of teachings and think you are a Sith. All that is irrelevant because the Jedi are about to find out that their completely delusional "fact" that the Sith were wiped out is wrong they are going to start looking for any Sith connections. Something that name and its history will count as. The last thing we need is the Jedi slowing down and interfering in our business when we are trying to stay solvent as a company. It is literally just making trouble for ourselves for no good reason.When did we get to arguing about Sith being good? My point was its entirely possible to not constantly act like a saturday morning cartoon villain and still be a Sith. Besides, from the brief description it sounded like Temaris wasn't even part of any Sith domain, just had a native darksider take it over, unify it, and then surrendered to the Republic. Would hardly be uncharacteristic of Jedi to name someone a Sith for using the Dark Side.
You realize that it isn't anything recent and the Council of Knowledge hasn't sent a Jedi Shadow in a thousend years. The name and its origin are at the moment only a historical footnote in both chases.It would because the Sith are not the only Darksiders around. And the Jedi are not stupid they wouldn't name someone a Sith if they weren't one. And no you really can't be a real Sith and not be a monster. At that point you are nothing more than an imposter that got lucky because the actual Sith were too busy to kill you or you are just barely got any of teachings and think you are a Sith. All that is irrelevant because the Jedi are about to find out that their completely delusional "fact" that the Sith were wiped out is wrong they are going to start looking for any Sith connections. Something that name and its history will count as. The last thing we need is the Jedi slowing down and interfering in our business when we are trying to stay solvent as a company. It is literally just making trouble for ourselves for no good reason.