- Location
- Ottawa
- Pronouns
- She/Her/Whatever
Of course, if you go too far into the core space gets so hot your ship does a burny so...
I mean, yeah, but the inner edge of habitable space is a much shorter distance than the outer edge; which also begs the question of what happens when you go really far North or South (Just not so far north you replicate the fate of the HMS Terror and HMS Erebus [lost with all hands on a polar expedition]).Of course, if you go too far into the core space gets so hot your ship does a burny so...
Sigh grumble grumble.Lt. Fusilier is a Lt. in the 7th Regiment of Foot, 9th Company.
Possibly. Though given the principle of the thing, sailing near the center and 'circumnavigating' it might be cheating. And there's what @open_sketch said about the cosmic background temperature.It doesn't take as long to circumnavigate the galaxy if you go corewards first, further given the description that you're more likely to be becalmed traveling spinwards or counterspinwards it may behoove you to describe a zig zag course of travel to alleviate concerns about that.
That would be rimward and coreward, not North and South, though?I mean, yeah, but the inner edge of habitable space is a much shorter distance than the outer edge; which also begs the question of what happens when you go really far North or South (Just not so far north you replicate the fate of the HMS Terror and HMS Erebus [lost with all hands on a polar expedition]).
I still want to believe that the really futuristic Navy ships are screw liners, with Victoriana being the futuristic gee-whiz aesthetic of the Space Regency's bleeding edge technology.Just once, I caught sight of our escort, HMS Edinburgh, out the window. She was quite far away, but it was impossible to miss the arrays of her sails glowing against the blackness. 90 guns stacked on its towering sides, a prow festooned in bizarre sensors and devices, the vessel was so such great mass that the sailors formed a series of concentric cones all around it, spreading out nearly a half-mile in diameter. Even then, it was just a tiny dot in the window.
The officers are not very good at this."It's a bit of bad luck, figuring it'll be short, though." I added. Everyone glanced over with bemusement. "Ah… among the enlisted. If you make assumptions what a deployment will be like, it'll always be the opposite. Want a nice long garrison somewhere? You'll be moving every two weeks. Hoping to get back to your friends? Prepare to stay two years."
"It does seem rather like tempting fate." Captain Teague said.
"Well, in the spirit of contrarianism, let's hope we're all struck down getting off the shuttles." Captain Murray announced.
"... that would be a short deployment." I pointed out.
To be fair, that is such an English thing to do, yes. In the old-school, this-is-what-Ankh-Morpork-echoes, sense. Nicking their word for nicking things....and the east ones, we nicked so much of their shit we nicked their word for nicking shit!" he said, gesticulating broadly.
"... I mean, yes, that did happen." Kennedy added, frowning. "The word loot is derived from the Hindi for robbery."
Stephen manages to dissociate in everything else he does, I can't see why music would be any different.I thought you couldn't get the effect from your own music?
Or is it dissociative music playing?
the details of such things are to be kept vague deliberatelyI can't help it, my brain keeps trying to imagine how the 19th century and abolition played out in America in this timeline.
It's somewhat amusing to me that the robots denting they're in charge is like a bad SV debate where they can't disprove the point so even their denials are vaguely affirming of the premise."Yeah, seriously. Civilization is a joint effort, Mile. There wouldn't be a point to any of it without humans." I said, "I think you've had too much to drink."
Like any good civil servant, robots have learned that it's a lot easier to "be in charge" if you are in charge of the decision space, as opposed to the decision. Nobody is held accountable for the decision space, just the decision, but by deciding what the decision space is, you can functionally predetermine the outcome.The problem is that the robots are "in charge" by virtue of providing a list of good options and letting humans pick the good ones.
I don't think it's wrong, but it does draw interesting parallels to the idea of civil service neutrality and influence.On the other hand, is it even the robots consistently delimiting the decision space? They've clearly had that effect in certain areas, but how many, and to what extent?
[And for that matter, they make up 98% or so of the sophont population of Terran civilization; it would arguably be grossly unfair if they didn't play a pretty significant role in setting the decision space]
I don't think it's wrong, but it does draw interesting parallels to the idea of civil service neutrality and influence.
Yes, that's kind of where I was going with it as well, because in a lot of ways it does seem apropos to the setting, doesn't it?I just had a mental image of Robot Sir Humphrey Appleby from Yes Minister, and it was excellent.
Kennedy's Flying Guns are a battery of three high powered direct energy laser cannons and their trailers (big power packs) on repulsors, towed by something a lot like the speeder bikes in Return of the Jedi, so they can do the same thing, just way, way faster. And yes, hover fairly high off the ground to fire over obstacles. The downside is that this is very much cutting edge technology, and they keep breaking down.
This is very literal - Homo Sapiens Robotus was probably designed with values that are directly satisfied by the satisfaction of human values. Second-person agency. It's a very neat concept (see Rule 34 by Charles Stross, which I quite recommend for this crowd) and I think by far the easiest proposal for Friendliness that might work.
Hey, I remember reading that when I was a kid! I told my English teacher I was reading a science-fiction detective novel set in future Scotland and told in the second person and he thought I was making it up.(see Rule 34 by Charles Stross, which I quite recommend for this crowd)