I can confirm I voted for it under vampire.
What why not true Ancestor it makes the most sense with how the votes are? Lostdeviljho was wrong when they said it wasn't under the vampire header since most of them were.
Can't a guy make a joke about gods of modernity and antiquity?
Not me, that's for sure.
You shut your whore mouth.
Oh yeah....
TA's are a bit too tough to suffer 'amusing injuries'. Arcuied, who admittedly isn't a typical example, was flat out immune to all mundane and a significant amount of supernatural harm; IIRC, she states that without a cheat like Shiki's eyes it would take a powerful conceptual weapon to hurt her (and even then, she's immune to a pretty big chunk of those).
To be fair she was literally designed as a tool to kill those True Ancestors who gave into the blood drinking, we wouldn't even be a fraction of her power.
By block it has 6 compared to marble's 10 which is more then half the block argument is mute though since Marble tied with vampire already. What we're saying here is that there's an obvious compromise to settle the tie here.
Actually, the votes run out as (assuming the tally is accurate):
... It's a function of a Gaia Terminals, of which True Ancestors are part of.
I'll go add a Poll.
Don't, you can't remove those afterwards unless you're staff.
A young and/or weak TA wouldn't be that overpowered. They just tend to get rated higher than they actually are since the only canonical appearance of one (as far as I'm aware) is Arcueid, who is ridiculously overpowered compared to standard TA's.
Too late.
