The USSR did provide relief and non-military aid to nations outside Europe as part of their competition. The 1970 Peru earthquake is one of the more prominent because of Nixon getting involved and one of the Antonov transport planes crashing.
But the post-1955 USSR sent significant financial aid to places like the historical UAR, India, Afghanistan, Iran, annd Indonesia.
Indeed. My point was that the UAR, and Neo-Comintern by extension, is in a notably different position from our USSR and its allies. Whereas just the pretense of international cooperation between the Comintern and non-communist world as a whole was more or less strangled before it could take-off in 1984 (beyond the five countries that would make up MICRO), the UN was established at the end of our WWII with the Soviets almost immediately taking an interest in both the international body and issues it addressed.
Conversely, whereas the Union was outnumbered on the Security Council and could never really reach parity with Western powers in trying to amass soft-power under the cover of "depoliticized" international cooperation, the Republic is in a far better position. The Unification Wars, while still bloody, costly and damaging in their own right, were relatively brief and removed from the UAR's current state today, while the USSR never really recovered from the damage it sustained in the Great Patriotic War. With its current batch of allies and partners, the UAR has the resources, manpower, labor, and state capacity to mobilize an effective response that can match the countries of "NATO & Friends" and then some.
Outside of UN Emergencies and Mandates, the potential for global development initiatives, especially when seen side-by-side with more predatory counterparts from the West, will generate much needed rapport among non-aligned states. In short, whereas the cold war to the 4CI of TLM mainly revolved around winning proxy conflicts against rival blocs and tending to member-states' needs, this new cold war takes on a new dimension entirely.