By that logic, doesn't that mean that they really have no meaningful incentive to actually improve your country and in fact, actively ruin it as a feature?
That's… the result people see when looking for malice and not considering the other option. Surprisingly, when a capitalist enterprise doesn't follow the rules of economics? They lose.
The IMF
doesn't actually get anything from poor performance. They don't strip a country's resources to the bone and cart it back to the states.
The US Military does that without needing to go through a global banking institution.
The IMF's sole source of income is interest on loans. It doesn't have a set of investors they need to fuck the customer over to give dividends to. All profits go right back into the lending.
They just don't have
accountability for being bad at their job. They make all their research in-house, cross-check current policies in house, and they do all their fuckup investigations… in house. There's no authority they report to other than a council of directors made up of member state representatives.
It's flown a bit under the radar, but it took until 2019 for the US Supreme Court to marginally pair back the legal high ground the IMF held. You can file a lawsuit in federal courts for US-based international organizations for Financial Fuckery, as difficult to win as that is, instead of being
absolutely immune akin to a foreign government.