dpara
slightly confused ascendant
Well put. You are convincing me.
The last problem is that Prayer is unlikely to like Alexandria
Enemies of Case 53s (We Have Suffered Enough) [Emotion|Fury] ●●●
Well put. You are convincing me.
That appears to be more generic than targeted towards Cauldron.The last problem is that Prayer is unlikely to like Alexandria
Enemies of Case 53s (We Have Suffered Enough) [Emotion|Fury] ●●●
Can definitely foresee some friction, but I expect it would be less personal and more with regards to the handling of C53s in the future (and whoever they're still holding on to).You owe them for your life and your powers, of that you are certain - a solitary life of unreachable desires, mind-shattering pain, and constant discrimination, but a life that ultimately allowed you to be united with the Great Maker, Autochthon. Nonetheless, if they truly are behind all the Case 53s, then there are many who will not be so forgiving as you find yourself to be.
Well put. You are convincing me.
The last problem is that Prayer is unlikely to like Alexandria
Enemies of Case 53s (We Have Suffered Enough) [Emotion|Fury] ●●●
Eden is dead. The whole Eden-coming-back-to-life bit stemmed from a "What if Cauldron didn't exist?" scenario, and it wasn't a guarantee even then. It's not a concern for the quest unless Grom has changed things.Exalting another C53 might well awaken Eden, or atleast allow her to contact Scion. So on one hand, Prayer would have no problem with Cauldron since they would be wiped out. The downside is that we would have potentially two entities, or atleast an additional zombie entity on the loose.
Eden is dead. The whole Eden-coming-back-to-life bit stemmed from a "What if Cauldron didn't exist?" scenario, and it wasn't a guarantee even then. It's not a concern for the quest unless Grom has changed things.
Is this the Butcher confirmed to be Cauldron power? Can you source?from what I could tell, shard influence on Cauldron capes was almost entirely a byproduct of a flawed shard with the Butcher, Sveta, and Noelle being the most triumphant examples thereof. Except the Butcher whose shard was so badly butchered it learned a new trick entirely, the others were the result of inhuman elements of their biology having impacted their psychology.
No, no no! We can't have people liking the Orichalcum candidates! Quick someone make some good anti Cauldron arguments!
Yeah, I remember it happening, I figured it was just some post-mortem reaction (emphasis on what just happened to the shard, basically).I believe she is not FULLY dead in this quest. Just mostly-dead or lobotomized or in coma or somesuch. Not at home so can't give you a WoG on it, but its a real risk that messing with Edens corpse might cause trouble.
The whole "Edens avatar started screaming in agony" when we exalted Marrow came straight from Gromweld. At minimum, there is a risk of activating some emergency signal designed to draw Scion to Eden to protect her.
Biggest concern with regards to exalting Alexandria (to me) is her power. It's exact nature is unclear, and some of the possibilities would be very difficult for Autobot to reconstruct (time stop in particular). On the other hand, her powers manifest as an amalgamation—Super Strength, Durability, Enhanced Senses, Enhanced Processing, Memory, etc. The effects should be relatively easy for Autochthon to emulate, regardless of what the exact nature Grom decides on is.
Dude, Alexandria is a Thinker.Yes, it very much is. Her inability to consider the possibility that she might have made an error in her initial judgments of Skitter killed her canon iteration.
Said conflicts are relatively minor. From a quest perspective, we're going to accomplish Cauldron's goal at some point regardless. Afterwards, Cauldron's only remaining goal is ensuring Humanity doesn't crumble in the aftermath, which we'll have to work towards anyways since we're going to be migrating a lot of people—Also a net positive for Cauldron, since it's likely a lot of individuals will die if Scion/Endbringers go on a rampage.
OK, the issue I have with this:Not really? Her agendas are pretty clear to us. They're basically Cauldron's, which is just stopping Scion/saving every Earth and ensuring Humanity can stabilize and doesn't fall apart in the aftermath. She definitely used to have her own hobbies/interest/etc (reading, for instance), but it looks like that was put aside with how busy she was with PRT/Protectorate/Cauldron stuff.
Is this the Butcher confirmed to be Cauldron power? Can you source?
I'd think something like a 'pseudo-perfect' (i.e. infinite soak, but still ignored by soak bypassing, or cannot be used against attacks that cannot be soaked ala some perfect dodges that can't be used against un-dodgeable attacks), which Transitory Invulnerability Engine seems close to (and it actually works thematically, transforming the Exalt entirely into their MM) - so possibly a 'semi-permanent' version that can't be activated under certain situations? I think the only actual soak boosters are sub/exo armour plating, and Essence Shield Projector (which doesn't really work I don't think). The other survival Charms don't really fit with Alexandria's whole 'invulnerable until she's not' thing. Possibly also have some of the non-combat Survival Charms as well.Most likely Alexandria would have charms that boost soak or such, but far more than standard. Or possibly very very cheap perfect defense. And IEU and other mental augments.
You quoted my post but didn't answer it. A mistake?
Ah, yep, sorry - it's not confirmed, but implied by something DM says. I don't believe there's any WoG or anything else, but it's definitely the bit I've seen in conjunction with Butcher as a Cauldron cape.
Which sounds familiar.29.7 said:"The powers are poor," the Doctor said. "Foreign, yes, but poor. When we tested these, we got a defensive power utilizing warped space and a power that allows one to take over a nearby parahuman's mind, body and powers automatically on death.
Or, all things considered, that the literally textbook counter to Thinkers is to spread misinformation to catch them out on a power enhanced misstep.But that is not the same thing as thinking her stupid, or assuming that a single mistake based on one fact she didn't know invalidates decades of single-minded service.
Only two major gaffs that come to mind are the canon scene with Taylor, which was caused by Taylor being able to offload emotions to her swarm, something she had no knowledge of/ability to predict, and the quest scene with Crawler/Siberian, which likely stemmed from her worry about containing Crawler before he could severaly injure/kill a bunch of PRT troops.
Not the optimal choice, but it was a minor issue that created a large problem—not enough time to sit down and listen to explanations/wait for scans, she chose to risk herself rather than let the PRT troops get killed by Crawler.
I'm sure I addressed this above... but that's a serious misrepresentation. She was lacking a vital piece of information. She had no reason to suspect it was there. She didn't think "oh, well even if I get her wrong I can handle it because I'm such a badass." Yes, she fucked up, and yes, it killed her, but it wasn't an issue of ego. She had no reason to suspect her judgment to be wrong.
At that point in Worm, the Undersiders had outright taken control over multiple parts of Brockton Bay and set themselves up as its rulers. Alexandria was confronting Taylor because Taylor had turned herself in to the PRT for the sole reason of threatening them into legitimizing the Undersiders' reign. Using a false show of force to try and put a halt on this insane plan is well worth the risk of escalation. The alternative is to let everyone know that the US government is willing to give up territory and citizenry to violent criminals.Alexandria had every reason to believe that her ability to predict Taylor's response was insufficient and that Taylor, when pushed, could be incredibly dangerous, but she went ahead with a plan that was unnecessarily confrontational to eke out rewards that were, frankly, not worth the risk that any reasonable assessment of the situation would have seen. That is an issue of ego, and it's a severe and, in my opinion, disqualifying one.
Again, I didn't claim she was evil or particularly self-aggrandizing. Just that she was arrogant. It's still arrogance, even if you are or were that good. There's always a bigger fish.I don't believe you're making me defend Rebecca Costa-Brown, but she isn't an evil person, or even a particularly self-aggrandizing one.
She definitely had reason to believe that Taylor was significantly more dangerous than she appeared, since Taylor had demonstrated such at literally every engagement, and pretty much every member of the Protectorate who had experience with Taylor could have told Alexandria that. She definitely had reason to believe that Taylor was also capable of using abilities in unexpected ways since Alexandria was there for the Noelle fight. She definitely had reason to believe that Taylor could defy predictions as she demonstrated when she escaped Dragon and Defiant after being revealed at the school.
Alexandria had every reason to believe that her ability to predict Taylor's response was insufficient and that Taylor, when pushed, could be incredibly dangerous, but she went ahead with a plan that was unnecessarily confrontational to eke out rewards that were, frankly, not worth the risk that any reasonable assessment of the situation would have seen. That is an issue of ego, and it's a severe and, in my opinion, disqualifying one.
It's not that she doesn't want to consider that she might be wrong, but secondguessing her enhanced cognition on the basis of someone else is rarely a good career decision for any Thinker, by invalidating their power's advantages.
That doesn't negate the charge of Hubris you know. Canon Alexandria implemented her plan rather stupidly and died a scrub's death for it.Using a false show of force to try and put a halt on this insane plan is well worth the risk of escalation.
"You know this cape that we have on the books as rated in several categories we're certain she doesn't have, just to be safe? Let's do something no one has managed yet. Let's make her mad. Surely we won't see something new or unexpected that way."That doesn't negate the charge of Hubris you know. Canon Alexandria implemented her plan rather stupidly and died a scrub's death for it.
Sounds like something Vault-Tec from the Fallout setting would do just for the hell of it."You know this cape that we have on the books as rated in several categories we're certain she doesn't have, just to be safe? Let's do something no one has managed yet. Let's make her mad. Surely we won't see something new or unexpected that way."
Cauldron did a fair lot of that. See also the "parahuman fedualism experiment." AKA: the Warlords of Brockton Bay. AKA: Coil and the Undersiders.Sounds like something Vault-Tec from the Fallout setting would do just for the hell of it.
To hold on the Alexandria bashing, if her information was accurate she would have basically shrugged it off. If the room wasn't helpfully cleared of all insects first, she would have seen the signs and adjusted."You know this cape that we have on the books as rated in several categories we're certain she doesn't have, just to be safe? Let's do something no one has managed yet. Let's make her mad. Surely we won't see something new or unexpected that way."
Millennia old Exalted who never stopped getting more swole have a maximum base Strength of 10, and the ability to maybe triple it for certain rolls.Fuck me running.
As someone with a grasp of Exalted's mechanics, but who hasn't read beyond the Core Rulebook and some of the splatbooks, how does that translate on Exalted's scale of power? 'Cause that sounds stupid huge.
10 dots in strength and 10 dots in athletics allow an Exalt to kick down metal reinforced gates.Fuck me running.
As someone with a grasp of Exalted's mechanics, but who hasn't read beyond the Core Rulebook and some of the splatbooks, how does that translate on Exalted's scale of power? 'Cause that sounds stupid huge.