So would anyone oppose using an action or two next turn to increase our tactics next turn seeing as we are kind of running towards bonuses for it because it was neglected and we clearly need it?
I'm not gonna be leaping for it just because people can't stay on target and get distracted by life.So would anyone oppose using an action or two next turn to increase our tactics next turn seeing as we are kind of running towards bonuses for it because it was neglected and we clearly need it?
Nah. We can always learn tactics, but Power is currently on a time-limit per say. I would be much happier if we focused on that to get it to 50 as soon as possible.So would anyone oppose using an action or two next turn to increase our tactics next turn seeing as we are kind of running towards bonuses for it because it was neglected and we clearly need it?
I'm not gonna be leaping for it just because people can't stay on target and get distracted by life.
I'll take that as a no then.Nah. We can always learn tactics, but Power is currently on a time-limit per say. I would be much happier if we focused on that to get it to 50 as soon as possible.
Or remove psyker abilities from those that lack a strong will, enhance the abilities of those who are capable of resisting chaos, mass produce weak psykers, mess with Chaos Sorcerers once/if they become a thing, etc. So many options.[X] Save the Capital!
agreed @MacroDaemon I really want the ability to reduce and remove chaos corruption.
Yea, that's pretty much confirmed that I want to tag it along with the other 2 Psyker skills once we get the All 25 Stat perkPerhaps not useful right now, but holy shit those Education: Esoteric 60/80/100 perks. That's one path I personally think we have to follow at one point as the threat of Chaos is ever present.
Sadly, we need the 40 or 60 perk to take Education: Esoteric 80.
Because we are a primarch with a speech all 50 who can talk them into it?Actually, that's a good point. Why would they put us in a command position?
Because we are a primarch with a speech all 50 who can talk them into it?
Yeah, I kind of agree. Even if they DO put us in a command position it's not exactly like we're THAT exceptional in command. They probably still have people superior to us there, and that's not going to put us in a position to kill the Warboss.Honestly, perhaps we should just pick some of the psyker perks and rip the orcs to shreds with the thing we are specialized in?
Also they might not have a choice if the Orks break through the lines, so we're preparing in case that happens and we need to rally some forces to stop it.Actually, that's a good point. Why would they put us in a command position?
The plan is a combo of the two. Diplo our way into command and prevent damage to the city by directing troops and win by killing the boss and scaring them away.Honestly, perhaps we should just pick some of the psyker perks and rip the orcs to shreds with the thing we are specialized in? While we could probably diplo our way to command something, it'd probably be easier to just go fight.
It's also a bad idea to mess with the command structure in times of crisis. They'll have their command and control structure in place, us showing up might not be all that helpful.Yeah, I kind of agree. Even if they DO put us in a command position it's not exactly like we're THAT exceptional in command. They probably still have people superior to us there, and that's not going to put us in a position to kill the Warboss.
That presumes that we can do a better job than anyone they have.The plan is a combo of the two. Diplo our way into command and prevent damage to the city by directing troops and win by killing the boss and scaring them away.