They aren't mutually exclusive. The main tradeoff is, I suppose, Naoto. She's your greatest combat asset—yes, but she's also on the back foot and fundamentally inclined to be defending someone else.What's the main tradeoff between asking her a question, as opposed to going straight to defending her? Are the two mutually exclusive, or is it possible to vote for both?
It doesn't seem to be not working, but it's been all of a couple of seconds and she hasn't had a chance to really tune in yet. You can probably assume it works fine.
Given the historic attempts of peacefully resolving these things in Persona, we might need UMI for that, you ok with that?
It's good to examine possibilities, but you fixate too quickly on single possibilities based on very limited, circumstantial evidence. You're also very quick to dismiss the simple explanations - it kind of sounds like you don't even consider the simple explanation to be a real theory.And I will also point out that having a theory is better than not having one at all, regardless of the track record.
Because in my mind, it's less a theory so much as the default assumption that Naoto is working off in story. She's expecting there to be a "real" Kana confronting her Shadow like in P4.You're also very quick to dismiss the simple explanations - it kind of sounds like you don't even consider the simple explanation to be a real theory
I could be wrong, but I'm not sure this Kana is particularly prone to volunteering information, especially given how she isn't clear on what's coming next and thus may not know to say the information she had that we'd want to know in that scenario?"Me?" she asked in a small voice that didn't match Utau's memories from the party in the least
-snip-
"I'm... Kana?" she said finally, looking a little lost. "Nanami Kana? I- I can't really explain! I just know! I'm so glad you came!" She paused for a second or so, shifting against Amu's hug—clutching at her friend's arm. Relieved, happy they were here—but scared. Timid, to an almost disturbing degree. "Um..."
Kana frowned slightly, ineffectively trying to pull away from the hug. A furrow grew in her brow, then she lifted her gaze back up to stare at Shirogane and Utau in turn.
"She's right behind me. And if you stay here then Kana will be angry," she continued—her voice sounding a little firmer and more confident, though only by a tiny amount. "Really angry."
Yes, but Occam's Razor exists and should be applied from time to time? (This is less applicable here because this is three cosmologies mashed together into one whole, admittedly; and I'm not asking for you to stop posting your theorization either)
Mhm, though there is, theoretically, an alternate explanation of "you can't get Yui this way until you deal with the other Shadows in the way first, too much fog lying around"?
Or "Yui is out cold and can't respond", or "Yui is in too many pieces for this to work", or a variety of other explanations.Mhm, though there is, theoretically, an alternate explanation of "you can't get Yui this way until you deal with the other Shadows in the way first, too much fog lying around"?
(That is, trying again after we resolve this seems worth an try, especially since it didn't consume WP last time)
...you know, I wonder if we have enough Mind Control skill with the Key to stabilise things for a short while?When they do exist, they're typically subsections of the 'administrative' grouping, but- remember that said grouping isn't a person. If ejected as a Shadow, it'll normally stay connected enough that it's still capable of using everything in the non-administrative sections of their mind, but the connections are weakened; and, lacking a coherent set of choices, insanity is the inevitable result.
A better comparison would be depth first search instead of breadth first search, with little negative effect (could be bad if we all get dragged along for the ride, but I don't think that's occuring here) as long as it doesn't make it into the votes?
If you mean "overfixating" in the context of bringing up potential evidence for a particular theory in the OOC discussion, I prefer to think of it as explaining in-depth why I consider that particular theory to be likely. If you find that to be excessive even when it's limited just to discussion and not the votes.... all I can say is, our definitions of "excessive" clearly differ.Or "Yui is out cold and can't respond", or "Yui is in too many pieces for this to work", or a variety of other explanations.
This is an example of what I see as Pistachio overfixating on single possibilities. Pistachio came up with the "Yui isn't here" idea, and now anything that could be interpreted as evidence for that idea does get interpreted as evidence, even when there are other possibilities.
Bringing up evidence isn't the problem. You already see "Yui isn't here" as confirmed. You judge evidence as being much more favorable for your preferred theories than it really is. I think you focus too hard on how evidence fits into your particular theory, with too little consideration for how it fits into other possibilities, or whether the evidence is actually strong.If you mean "overfixating" in the context of bringing up potential evidence for a particular theory in the OOC discussion, I prefer to think of it as explaining in-depth why I consider that particular theory to be likely. If you find that to be excessive even when it's limited just to discussion and not the votes.... all I can say is, our definitions of "excessive" clearly differ.
There's a limit to how many surprises and how much complexity you can cram into a narrative without making a bloated mess. Most of the time, the right explanation is a simple one in fiction too.I believe a point you brought up before in favor of "default" assumptions being the likely ones comes from something to the effect of the simplest explanations usually being the case in real life, which is something that may be true..... in real life.
On the other hand, when it comes to creative writing, that kind of thing tends to be considered "boring" and "predictable", making it somewhat less-likely to be the case in a work of fiction.
I'd add "the pursuer is someone's cognition of Kana" to the list. Perhaps not using the term "cognition", since Baughn hasn't played Persona 5, but the idea of cognitions sounds like the kind of thing Baughn would think of as obvious. (I think that thing Naoto blasted may have been a cognition.)Take your pick. Most of these have some reason or other (usually a meta reason or OOC knowledge from discussion) for being lower down on the likelihood list by, my personal estimation.
Personally I would put this a lot higher on the list: It's on-brand for theme, she had to get her Mind Control dots from somewhere, and if she doesn't remember her own name she can't have her family cause problems eventually right?The pursuer is Kana's non-Shadow self and the reason her non-Shadow self is so hostile is because it has been thoroughly brainwashed by Manticore into believing she is called Akane and has been conditioned to constantly, subconsciously beat her own Shadow into submission in order to repress her own memories.
Hoy, I actually wasn't wrong about Saaya having used her powers before. Someone else did think I was wrong and they actually managed to convince me that my suspicions about it were unfounded.Bringing up evidence isn't the problem. You already see "Yui isn't here" as confirmed. You judge evidence as being much more favorable for your preferred theories than it really is. I think you focus too hard on how evidence fits into your particular theory, with too little consideration for how it fits into other possibilities, or whether the evidence is actually strong.
At least you're not acting on your theories quite as aggressively as, say, that time you thought Saaya had seen rifts before.
She'd knowingly tried to use psionics to break stuff before her standoff with Amu - it just didn't result in reality completely breaking to the point of letting in demons that time. So she did know (or suspected) that she'd contributed to making the rift.Saaya reaches for that energy, without the lens of a ruby, and grasps the core of a nuclear reactor.
The surge of energy erases her table, bedroom door and a chunk of the opposite wall from existence.
Possibly- there are certainly parallels to Futaba's situation. But the main issue is it doesn't explain why the domain was ripping itself apart, it's a little difficult to conceive of a cognition having enough power to do that.I'd add "the pursuer is someone's cognition of Kana" to the list. Perhaps not using the term "cognition", since Baughn hasn't played Persona 5, but the idea of cognitions sounds like the kind of thing Baughn would think of as obvious. (I think that thing Naoto blasted may have been a cognition.)
The list wasn't in order of likelihood but yeah, I almost put this on the level of likelihood as the transplant theory.Personally I would put this a lot higher on the list: It's on-brand for theme, she had to get her Mind Control dots from somewhere, and if she doesn't remember her own name she can't have her family cause problems eventually right?
That's completely different from breaking Reality before though, unless you want to argue that we have done the same before like Saaya?
.....I dunno, it was the exact same skill. "Spatial fabric" may be a step up from "chunk of room", but presumably she went through the exact same process of lashing out. Just because her swing hit the television instead of the vase doesn't change the fact someone was swinging a wrecking ball around on purpose.That's completely different from breaking reality before though, unless you want to argue that we have done the same before like Saaaya?