- Location
- Not the asylum anymore
- Pronouns
- She/Her
[X] Sunseeker
What's the alternative? People voting for all the things they want to do separately, and also the number of things, and the most popular number of things get done, starting from the thing that was voted the most? That would work, but it would be pretty awkward, and we'd probably end up with an itinerary no individual person asked for.The time-block voting is a weird and annoying format since order matters...
I feel like this could have been slightly alleviated by using a plan voting format, just an idea for future reference.Thank you all for your patience with this slightly clunky vote: the ordering is important, as different things at different times can have an effect.
Nah, actually just twelve. I'd Approval Voted for both "Levinheart" and "Ryza Levinheart" just in case, 'cause i didn't want to check which one had more votes, and thus we don't wanna accidentally count my vote twice or something. Looks like Brainbow, the other "Ryza Levinheart" vote on the tally did the same.Levinheart's actually got 14, as there's two votes further down that include Ryza's name, but Thunderheart and Sunseeker are still in contention.
Is that not what we're doing?I feel like this could have been slightly alleviated by using a plan voting format, just an idea for future reference.
Kind of, but not really? It wasn't presented as a plan vote so I think everyone just took it as a block vote instead. That's why there are a ton of random entries there.
What I'm attempting to say is that plan votes tend to be more organized, where things like the number of choices and the order of the votes have a purpose. This seems to be what the author was going for. While block votes are, in my experience, usually just a list of choices that people vote for. Maybe I'm mis-catagorizing it as something else, however, the case is that the voters did not appear to realize that the author was attempting to make a plan style vote for this interaction.What's the distinction between block and plan votes that you're trying to make?
For me at least, Ryza isn't trained in proper spycraft, and I'm firmly against any kid's movie escapades against a man who would gladly see her discredited and/or dead. We've informed the head honcho wizard man who is as far as we can tell is taking us seriously, we've warned as many of the students as we could that have a stake in maintaining operational security, and most plans are voting to talk to other important people (the tower heads). We're in as good a position we can get without further risk.I am deeply concerned at the majority for not bothering to figure out what the Regent's plan is and just letting it trigger.
And honestly, we were only asked to warn Stormspeaker. Artemis' Dad considers that enough to offset the danger. Which I'll concede is a major assumption to make about a villain willing to start a continental war against all comers (even if our interference already has him scaling things back to just the North. I think it was just the North)."As much as it is against my nature; I will give you this choice: you can go to try and protect my son by warning Archmage Stormspeaker of the threat. He will not tolerate any attempt to undo Thundercrier's Compact; simply telling him what is to come should be enough for him to gather enough allies that even the Regent will have to back down.
Can't speak for the majority, but I voted against that not because I don't think it's something we should do, but because I don't think it's something we can do, at least not to a meaningful degree. I doubt Soaringhawk would suggest an action that did literally nothing, but by no means does that mean everything he suggests could fully accomplish its stated purpose.I am deeply concerned at the majority for not bothering to figure out what the Regent's plan is and just letting it trigger.