Grandfather Clock and the Town of Mimics (Mafia)

Can you explain this again a bit to get conversation going?
D2-D3's events look, to me, like Meso claimed suspicion of Yun D2, did not have that suspicion D3, then when pressed on the discrepancy tried to come up with an explanation that didn't look scummy.
Importantly, D3's events notably do not read to me like Meso had genuine suspicion of Yun that they lacked confidence in.
This part of the read stands independant of Yun's scum/towniness.

The read was more compelling and more damning when I thought Yun was scum, because in the case of a Meso/Yun scum team there was a clear, scummy reason for the D2 post, a clear, scummy reason for not following up on it D3, and a clear, scummy reason for when they started exhibiting suspicions again D3.
These reasons no longer hold up, making me less certain of the scumread.

In light of Yun being town, I don't see any clear purpose behind Meso's late D2 - early D3 posts. It reads most like Meso claimed suspicion of Yun D2, and entirely forgot about it D3.
 
@mesonoxian Assuming now that you were being honest:
Why did it take so long to get an answer that I found satisfactory?
Was I unclear what I was looking for?
Should I have found an earlier answer satisfactory?
 
@mesonoxian Assuming now that you were being honest:
Why did it take so long to get an answer that I found satisfactory?
Was I unclear what I was looking for?
Should I have found an earlier answer satisfactory?
I don't know. I tried to explain repeatedly and I am not sure why my latter explanations were acceptable when the earlier ones weren't. It struck me as rather suspicious actually.

I was suspicious of Yun, but my one specimen of his play was equally suspicious so I wavered. His scumread of Rosen made me less so, but Rosen being town didn't eliminate my doubts (unfortunately rightly).

What I don't get is how my reluctance to go after Yun is at all an issue at this point. And while you said before you thought I was suspicious apart from Yun, I haven't seen anything presented other than my not being sure about his scumminess and my answers to your questions about it. And you claimed your suspicion predated your questioning of me, so that's worrying.

If your push had worked, I'd have died, and I imagine town would be circling on Yun right now and a scum victory would be all but in the books.
 
Could you break this down a bit for me. I can't tell if you were saying you thought the secondary wagon was forced, or that reading it as suspicious is forced?

Sorta a can't have one without the other, but it boils down to the suspicions being forced. And it still does to an extent. It's hyper focusing on one detail and ignoring the rest/ the player's standard metric. I have to regrab my quotes but my current thought process is IH is Scum. As for their teammate I'm certain it's between you or shadell, but I'd rather take that 50/50 with my thoughts at EoD.

Now going down to the night kill I feel it was between Me and Pawn. While I'm sad Pawn got killed over me I suppose I'll be the savior. :p Okay meme joke over I think Pawn was killed for two reasons: 1- To attempt to make conversation be monofocused on the veterans today, and 2- To make people more certain of their reads, or specifically their town reads. Now I did Iso's on both Slots and the players in the slots. The constant read I was getting strangly TMI posts from IH along with constant move against the lynch flow feeling. I can put up points later when I re-find the quotes but yet. Sunday so I can't be super active but I am here ish.

Again. We are in LyLo. a Single town not voting at scum is grounds for scum to win as ties are No Lynch's.
 
I don't know. I tried to explain repeatedly and I am not sure why my latter explanations were acceptable when the earlier ones weren't. It struck me as rather suspicious actually.
Your first two answers were about later events than the ones I was asking about. Your next few claimed to have always been scumreading Yun, which I did not find to be a satisfying answer because there was manifest evidence that you were not scumreading Yun, namely the post where you said you had no scum reads. Only the very final post in the spoilers actually reads as giving justification for why you would claim a scumread one day and claim a lack of scumread the next.

I'm still scumreading Yun. I just think that permitting inactivity to function as a strategy is bad for the long term health of our mafia games overall, since it produces an environment where not playing is a viable scum strategy. Yun is absolutely who I would be voting for if eliminating scum this game were my only concern, but when QT hadn't posted for most of entire day for the second time I thought actually acting on my previously stated principles was called for.
This one is about switching to QT, and states a present scumread of Yun.

I'll be honest, I have had a hard time getting into this game. There is essentially no night analysis to be done and a solid quarter of players aren't interacting by day. If I were scum I wouldn't mind, since my fun would be in avoiding suspicion. But I am town so my fun is in trying to solve the game and find scum, and I don't think that is possible, since there is a big block of nothing happening.

Yun's been playing weird, and sometimes I am pretty sure they are scummy, but then I think about the bizarre interaction with Nictis last game and I wonder what not weird for Yun would look like. That isn't a terribly nice argument to make, but my one sample of town Yun was them playing in what looked like a really irrational, tunneling manner.

I'm not blind, I know my ambivalence toward Yun looks scummy, but I backed off my vote for QT on Day 2 too quickly due to the fact making policy votes feel bad and getting too focused on Rosen. I should have stuck with it, and today seemed to be set up for more of the same.

I've talked about my feelings on inactivity votes in previous games, and this case seemed egregious enough that if I didn't do it this game it would mean I would never carry through. That isn't acceptable to me, even if it means getting voted as a townie.

Nevermind.


[X] Vote Yun
This one is again about switching to QT
(Note that this is a reply to Shadell, even though it's apparently directed at me.)

If this is what you meant, I already replied. Basically I have thought Yun's play was weird all along, I explicitly said as much in the post you quoted.

But I thought they were new, and moreover my only experience of Yun was the last Archdemon game, where his play was similar to his play here, was quickly marked as scum, and he was town.

So yeah, the idea that the scum team is letting us knock off a town player with a weird style worries me, but I see no better options and his subsequent play hasn't left me feeling any better about him.

So there is no conflict between the posts. Yun is my best choice to eliminate scum, but I am still worried I am wrong and missing something that would point to another scum, either Yun's team mate or a completely different team.
This one states that when you said you were scumreading Yun earlier you in fact meant you'd always been scumreading Yun.
This could theoretically be read as 'I lost confidence in my Yun scumread, which is why I said I had no scumreads' but given the present tense and context, it read as justifying the current vote, not the past behaviour.

Day 2 I was voting for QT, but QT showed up for a bit, and I thought Rosen was scum, and frankly I was getting frustrated with Rosen's play so I swapped to Rosen prematurely instead of sticking with QT. Day 3 I tried to correct that mistake but QT subbed out so I switched to Yun.

I think Yun is the best candidate. Not sure they're scum though, just my best guess at it.
Again justifies the swaps to QT.

"Scumreading" isn't the same as being totally certain someone was scum, Yun already was suspected by other people, so there was hardly any benefit on jumping in and trying to convince people of a case I was still uncertain of, especially after my push on Rosen blew up in my face. I shouldn't think it is too surprising that made me doubt my reads. So I decided to watch and see how things went. When we had even more lurking, I felt compelled to return to voting for QT.
This is the first time you do anything that might justify why you say you have a scumread one day and say you don't have a scumread the next.



I was suspicious of Yun, but my one specimen of his play was equally suspicious so I wavered. His scumread of Rosen made me less so, but Rosen being town didn't eliminate my doubts (unfortunately rightly).
...Can you restate this? I think typos mangled it a bit.

What I don't get is how my reluctance to go after Yun is at all an issue at this point.
If I claim a read, and am caught in a lie about it, that is full stop scummy. I think I have caught you in a lie about having had a scumread.

And while you said before you thought I was suspicious apart from Yun, I haven't seen anything presented other than my not being sure about his scumminess and my answers to your questions about it.
I have said before that my suspicions on you, specifically the perceived contradiction here, do not require Yun being scum. I have not presented or claimed anything further, since beyond this my evidence is weak.

And you claimed your suspicion predated your questioning of me, so that's worrying.
And this flat out never happened.
 
Your first two answers were about later events than the ones I was asking about. Your next few claimed to have always been scumreading Yun, which I did not find to be a satisfying answer because there was manifest evidence that you were not scumreading Yun, namely the post where you said you had no scum reads. Only the very final post in the spoilers actually reads as giving justification for why you would claim a scumread one day and claim a lack of scumread the next.

This one is about switching to QT, and states a present scumread of Yun.


This one is again about switching to QT
(Note that this is a reply to Shadell, even though it's apparently directed at me.)


This one states that when you said you were scumreading Yun earlier you in fact meant you'd always been scumreading Yun.
This could theoretically be read as 'I lost confidence in my Yun scumread, which is why I said I had no scumreads' but given the present tense and context, it read as justifying the current vote, not the past behaviour.


Again justifies the swaps to QT.


This is the first time you do anything that might justify why you say you have a scumread one day and say you don't have a scumread the next.




...Can you restate this? I think typos mangled it a bit.


If I claim a read, and am caught in a lie about it, that is full stop scummy. I think I have caught you in a lie about having had a scumread.


I have said before that my suspicions on you, specifically the perceived contradiction here, do not require Yun being scum. I have not presented or claimed anything further, since beyond this my evidence is weak.


And this flat out never happened.
No typos at all that I can see. I thought Yun was acting weird. That made think he was scummy. But last game he acted weird and was town, so that made me doubt my read. The fact he was hostile to Rosen, who I believed to be scum made me less suspicious, but when flipped town that didn't make me certain of their scumminess. Saying someone is my best scumread or my preferred target to catch scum isn't the same as saying I know or believe they are scum. If I have a weak or uncertain scumread on only one person, that makes them my favored target, but it doesn't mean my read on them is solid.


I see that you figured it out, but I alread typed it so I'll leave it in.

You didn't catch me in a lie, you caught me being indecisive, which is the cornerstone of my town play every time. I might have mangled up the timeline at some point recounting things, since I wasn't keeping notes of my suspicion level, but the reality is what I laid out, I thought Yun was suspicious, but my only baseline for them was equally suspicious town play last game.

You said you thought I was scummy apart from my indecisiveness. Specifically you said you were more sure of my scumminess than Yun's. But all of your evidence for my scumminess has been that you thought my read on Yun was inconsistent. So what exactly is supposed to be my motive if Yun wasn't my team mate? Why would I push against QT for inactivity, despite knowing it makes me look scummier if Yun is just as good a catch for the scum team? This seems to me very much a narrative looking for evidence rather than evidence used to build an image of what is going on. The only question in my mind is whether this is townie tunneling or an attempt to cinch the game for scum.

My guess is honestly the latter. It makes sense. If town goes in blind and picks someone more or less at random, we have a 60% chance of hotting town, but we still have a 40% chance of hitting scum, and there are no strong really cases at this point. Scum finally have good cause to go out on a limb to try to set up a wagon instead of just letting town autocannibalize. And I am the only townie with even the shadow of a case against me, so scum can't afford to let go of it.
 
No typos at all that I can see. I thought Yun was acting weird. That made think he was scummy. But last game he acted weird and was town, so that made me doubt my read. The fact he was hostile to Rosen, who I believed to be scum made me less suspicious, but when flipped town that didn't make me certain of their scumminess. Saying someone is my best scumread or my preferred target to catch scum isn't the same as saying I know or believe they are scum. If I have a weak or uncertain scumread on only one person, that makes them my favored target, but it doesn't mean my read on them is solid.


I see that you figured it out, but I alread typed it so I'll leave it in.

You didn't catch me in a lie, you caught me being indecisive, which is the cornerstone of my town play every time. I might have mangled up the timeline at some point recounting things, since I wasn't keeping notes of my suspicion level, but the reality is what I laid out, I thought Yun was suspicious, but my only baseline for them was equally suspicious town play last game.

You said you thought I was scummy apart from my indecisiveness. Specifically you said you were more sure of my scumminess than Yun's. But all of your evidence for my scumminess has been that you thought my read on Yun was inconsistent. So what exactly is supposed to be my motive if Yun wasn't my team mate? Why would I push against QT for inactivity, despite knowing it makes me look scummier if Yun is just as good a catch for the scum team? This seems to me very much a narrative looking for evidence rather than evidence used to build an image of what is going on. The only question in my mind is whether this is townie tunneling or an attempt to cinch the game for scum.

My guess is honestly the latter. It makes sense. If town goes in blind and picks someone more or less at random, we have a 60% chance of hotting town, but we still have a 40% chance of hitting scum, and there are no strong really cases at this point. Scum finally have good cause to go out on a limb to try to set up a wagon instead of just letting town autocannibalize. And I am the only townie with even the shadow of a case against me, so scum can't afford to let go of it.

Lemme just quote myself
D2-D3's events look, to me, like Meso claimed suspicion of Yun D2, did not have that suspicion D3, then when pressed on the discrepancy tried to come up with an explanation that didn't look scummy.
Importantly, D3's events notably do not read to me like Meso had genuine suspicion of Yun that they lacked confidence in.
This part of the read stands independant of Yun's scum/towniness.

The read was more compelling and more damning when I thought Yun was scum, because in the case of a Meso/Yun scum team there was a clear, scummy reason for the D2 post, a clear, scummy reason for not following up on it D3, and a clear, scummy reason for when they started exhibiting suspicions again D3.
These reasons no longer hold up, making me less certain of the scumread.

In light of Yun being town, I don't see any clear purpose behind Meso's late D2 - early D3 posts. It reads most like Meso claimed suspicion of Yun D2, and entirely forgot about it D3.
If I claim a read, and am caught in a lie about it, that is full stop scummy. I think I have caught you in a lie about having had a scumread.

In short, I don't think I believe you about it being indecisiveness, based on how the posts read. I am not certain in my disbelief. I don't know why you'd claim a scumread on Yun that you didn't have. My disbelief is not wholly dependent on potential motive. Even with no clear scum motive, lying is scummy.

Is this sufficiently clear?
 
@Shadell can you give me your read on Pyrros?

Firstly, I don't buy Pawn's townread on Pyrros for one. A lot of it was arguing principles and meta-game and scum A: doesn't really expose themselves or help town too much by taking a strong stance on game principles (in fact, arguing out the clock on a tangent like that that's often town v town would be an easy way to distract town), and also, my guess is that the large majority of players would forget their alignment and get 100% invested in defending a pet theory on game strategy or persuasion to the expense of anything else. It's easy to read that firmness and proactive stance as clearing, but I don't think it is ultimately.

What's clearing is scum showing that kind of aggression in ways that have risks to scum, pushing conversation forward, building out reads, generating knowledge that works.


ATM, I have suspicions on IH and you, but I'm working through a read on Cyri that's just going to be a bit of work since I want to be comprehensive, and depending on where that lands, I would probably shift scum on Pyrros if I end up scumreading Cyri, otherwise still agonizingly null overall.


Sorta a can't have one without the other, but it boils down to the suspicions being forced. And it still does to an extent. It's hyper focusing on one detail and ignoring the rest/ the player's standard metric. I have to regrab my quotes but my current thought process is IH is Scum. As for their teammate I'm certain it's between you or shadell, but I'd rather take that 50/50 with my thoughts at EoD.

Explain the logic on me or Meso partnered with IH?
 
Quick, so Pawn and Nictis are very clear NK targets as both are very strong, well-known players. Shalmoa was a solid neutral kill, being TR pretty widely (with Pawn as the notable exception.) Zaea, however, is a newer player who wasn't likely seen as a core threat to scum, and who was being fairly widely scumread. We've been back and forth over the NK there a few times, but we know 7 players aren't scum now. Based on this, and the Zaea kill as a bit of a standout among the night-kills, who do people think would have really stood to gain cover from murdering Zaea instead of a more prominent/townread player?

Building this out, the Zaea kill happened N2, after Nictis, -Rosen and Happerry were dead, so the players besides Zae were:

  1. @Cyricubed
  2. @mesonoxian
  3. @Yun Bob the Trouser Mimic, [Exiled to the Dungeon] d3.
  4. @Shalmoa Cynthia the Mimic Mimic, [Murdered in the Night] n3.
  5. @OriginalName replaced by @InterstellarHobo d2.
  6. @QTesseract
  7. @Shadell
  8. @Scia

Meso's been scumread all game, making them an unlikely NK target (and thus have little need to randomize a kill to hit whoever), Yun, Shalmoa and Ori are all confirmed town (and thus not responsible). QT was inactive, so also not a high NK priority likely. IH had just subbed in, and would probably be extended some leniency.

So, that really leaves me, Scia and Cyri as players I'd expect to have been hit before Zaea. Of these, my read of the situation is that Cyri and I have more experience, were more actively townread at that time and would also have been seen as a bigger threat.

As I know I'm town, I think the Zaea kill actually is fairly incriminating for Cyricubed, as Cyri's the only remaining unknown who stood to gain if scum at this point.

So, what else has Cyri done that's scummy?

D4 was the shortest/easiest day to examine. This is a solid post, but most of Cyri's other D4 posts are throwing near random questions at people and doing nothing with the feedback. It's possible Cyri was lost as I was, but I also don't like that these are very theoryless posts. OTOH, the thread was dead. Overall, I think I could see scum-Cyri doing

D3 again had a lot of fairly low effort questioning of others that doesn't really feel like it builds to much. Cyri jumps on the Yun wagon early (though everyone kinda did) and I get the impression of either scum trying to look proactive or town casting around for a theory. Very consistent with D4, but not clearing. Pawn's entry into the thread brought a lot more structure to the Day and really helped clean things up, and I think this post from Pyrros is interesting, but more on that

D2 is probably the towniest Day. Cyri spends a lot of time responding to Yun, who gets progressively more defensive and tunnels on Cyri in response. Cyri's also got early consistent scumreads on both Meso and Yun that endure. OTOH, Cyri admits to backing off a scumread to vote on Happerry in a way that I don't really like in retrospect, and also a lot of this seems more like a scummy-looking Yun accidentally hand

D1 is interesting. As of 148 I was suspecting Cyri. here Cyri kinda talked up a big idea earlyish in the Day, but then dropped it for no reasons. That, again matches the idea of a scum player trying to look towny by doing towny plans and not relaly working out the internal core of genuine town logic, in contrast to genuine town doing towny things by virtue of following an internal town process. 328 has some posts that I think aren't great either and reads like some massive hedging combined with a vote against Cyri's own reads. EoD is something a lot of people cleared Cyri for, with an early swap onto the Happerry wagon that Cyri... didn't really justify. It felt cleaner than the late joiners, but it's not as good as I thought at the time.

Overall then, Cyri feels... okay, which is something that feels off at this point. They've had a few persistent scumreads (Meso, Yun) but spent a huge proportion of their time doing stuff that feels more like activity to look active rather than activity to be active, and I haven't felt strong pushes from them to really act on those reads, rather than throwing them out and being willing to hop off when others have joined the read. Add in that Cyri's the only real player I think had motive to NK Zaea and I think there's a fair case for Cyriscum to be made here.

If so, Pyrros stands out as a possible teammate due mostly to the quoted post where a lot of very vague, waffly reads are paired with a very concrete statement on Cyri that sets off alarm bells.

OTOH, I could see Meso as a partner as well, with the read on Meso being a dedicated strategy of distancing.

Not voting yet, because I want responses to this, and I want to build similar profiles on IH and Meso.
 
My current feeling is that our team is something like IH/Pyrros or IH/Shadell, but given my track record this game that means nothing.
 
Firstly, I don't buy Pawn's townread on Pyrros for one. A lot of it was arguing principles and meta-game and scum A: doesn't really expose themselves or help town too much by taking a strong stance on game principles (in fact, arguing out the clock on a tangent like that that's often town v town would be an easy way to distract town), and also, my guess is that the large majority of players would forget their alignment and get 100% invested in defending a pet theory on game strategy or persuasion to the expense of anything else. It's easy to read that firmness and proactive stance as clearing, but I don't think it is ultimately.
You are correct that it is fairly NAI, as I am generally willing to state my stances on game theory clear when I don't feel it will endanger me. Something that would endanger me would do so equally as Town or Scum, since either way being read as Scum is a bad thing.

That said, I wasn't defending it. I stated my reasoning and then ended the conversation there. Defending would more try to provide examples or otherwise try to show why Pawn is wrong in his assessment, which is both not really something I want to get in to about a subjective opinion and also not really advisable at this level of gameplay.
If so, Pyrros stands out as a possible teammate due mostly to the quoted post where a lot of very vague, waffly reads are paired with a very concrete statement on Cyri that sets off alarm bells.
I still don't really get why you guys are saying this. Just about the only thing differing from my Cyricubed statement and half of my reads is that I have at least a bit of experience with Cyricubed and no/little experience with you, Shalmoa, or Yun - which I actually stated in the statements on you and Shalmoa. That is literally all the difference in terms of how "concrete" my spewing out random thoughts comes out. Like, it's not really that concrete.

When I mean something concrete, I say "hard town" or "hard scum." "Light Town" is never a concrete reading from me, especially since I explicitly don't do reads for the reason that my thoughts are always changing and adjusting, sometimes in paranoia and sometimes because I am not sure how to interpret information.
 
Explain the logic on me or Meso partnered with IH?

Because I strongly doubt Terra would look at Ori/Scia and say: Okay that's be fine as the two scum to make in a completely day phase intensive game given the majority of the player base. I'd expect at min 1 vet in the team of play experience leveling around you and Meso(you both started around the same time and have played consistantly) and go up from there. I know I'm town, my original IH scum partner was Pawn/QT slot but that got thrown in the gutter. I also disbelieve a Meso/Yun scumteam simply based on the pawn kill being a vet kill. I doubt if it was a double vet team they'd want to increase risk of lynch to a 66% on numbers alone. IH and Pyrros aren't bad players and I doubt they'd fall to sheeping two vets tunneling on one person without thinking Hrmmm...

The problem I've had is I'm uncertain if it's you or if IH and Meso's interactions were fabricated. The main thing I'm focusing on atm is IH as he is the scum read I have.

If you look back when IH entered the game he poked around on what peoples thoughts about Zae was. This was D2. continuing on we see more and more come out from them. They also give a strangly accurate reading of Yun, that he's aruging with bad faith and not the best arguments (There is a reason I didn't address Yun's last post, post flip for this reason, it wasn't a good argument and one I was willing to engage with as it's basis is that I poked QT's inactivity and thus I'm their scumpartner...the reality is I just don't enjoy stale games and would do this no matter what)

Overall I've gotten a cautious poke the waters field with IH that coupled with a few too many TMI posts looking back to say that it's just coincidence. Then we have the Meso push. Now again, Meso/IH interaction could be a two-sided facade but either way I'm pretty sure IH's side feels forced. The logic for coming to suspicion is backwards and focusing the lynch, Yun is scum and if so Meso is scum, lynch meso. Now IH stated they had other reasons for susing meso that didn't matter if Yun flipped town, that reads to me as scum trying to set-up a reason to keep a bad lynch and reasonings. Especially when I can't really agree with the reasonings for susing meso at this point.
 
I'm on the fence about which of Meso or Shadell are scum but I'm leaning shadell atm. That being said I'm much more confidant in my IH read. I think the Scia/Pyrros slot is town based off Pyrros alone actually. Their play has matched what I remember of their town play although it has been a while and Scia never really hit my sus radar too hard after D1 from memory and current notes. I'd have my quotes but I haven't found time to hunt them again so apologies. I have them saved on work computer so I might be able to hit shlap them in tomorrow.

For now I'm confidant in my read and don't want to forget to do this so

[X] Vote InterstellarHobo
 
Because I strongly doubt Terra would look at Ori/Scia and say: Okay that's be fine as the two scum to make in a completely day phase intensive game given the majority of the player base. I'd expect at min 1 vet in the team of play experience leveling around you and Meso(you both started around the same time and have played consistantly) and go up from there. I know I'm town, my original IH scum partner was Pawn/QT slot but that got thrown in the gutter. I also disbelieve a Meso/Yun scumteam simply based on the pawn kill being a vet kill. I doubt if it was a double vet team they'd want to increase risk of lynch to a 66% on numbers alone. IH and Pyrros aren't bad players and I doubt they'd fall to sheeping two vets tunneling on one person without thinking Hrmmm...

The problem I've had is I'm uncertain if it's you or if IH and Meso's interactions were fabricated. The main thing I'm focusing on atm is IH as he is the scum read I have.

If you look back when IH entered the game he poked around on what peoples thoughts about Zae was. This was D2. continuing on we see more and more come out from them. They also give a strangly accurate reading of Yun, that he's aruging with bad faith and not the best arguments (There is a reason I didn't address Yun's last post, post flip for this reason, it wasn't a good argument and one I was willing to engage with as it's basis is that I poked QT's inactivity and thus I'm their scumpartner...the reality is I just don't enjoy stale games and would do this no matter what)

Overall I've gotten a cautious poke the waters field with IH that coupled with a few too many TMI posts looking back to say that it's just coincidence. Then we have the Meso push. Now again, Meso/IH interaction could be a two-sided facade but either way I'm pretty sure IH's side feels forced. The logic for coming to suspicion is backwards and focusing the lynch, Yun is scum and if so Meso is scum, lynch meso. Now IH stated they had other reasons for susing meso that didn't matter if Yun flipped town, that reads to me as scum trying to set-up a reason to keep a bad lynch and reasonings. Especially when I can't really agree with the reasonings for susing meso at this point.

I am... really suspect of this post. First off, the Yun read:
"They also give a strangly accurate reading of Yun, that he's aruging with bad faith and not the best arguments (There is a reason I didn't address Yun's last post, post flip for this reason, it wasn't a good argument and one I was willing to engage with as it's basis is that I poked QT's inactivity and thus I'm their scumpartner...the reality is I just don't enjoy stale games and would do this no matter what)"
It was patently obvious that Yun was arguing with bad faith and not the best arguments, this is in fact one of the things you scumread them for.
The only thing that's insightful about my read there is the reasoning of being highly pressured I ascribed to Yun. I don't think that's an incredibly difficult thing to read in to Yun's play.


Secondly:
"a few too many TMI posts looking back to say that it's just coincidence."
Do you have any other than the Yun read?
Cause too many well informed posts is definitely not a correct assessment of my play this game.

Thirdly:
"The logic for coming to suspicion is backwards and focusing the lynch, Yun is scum and if so Meso is scum, lynch meso."
Where in that argument did I exhibit this logic? This claim was never made.
 
Nooooo I lost my quotes on this computer too!? Ffs. Ugh...I need the quotes to point at the argument. Give me a bit.
 
What is/was the case against Zaelix, in summary? If such a summary exists a link will suffice.
What is/was the case against Happery, ditto above?
@Shadell, can you clarify what your stance on -Rosen is, and why?

This is where you first went in poking the waters about Zaelix, trying to get an idea of what towns thought process of them at the time.

Right, thoughts. I've mostly just been rereading the Zaealix bailout, keeping up with the thread a bit, and farting around with other things. A lot of time has been wasted.

I went to the effort to put this together, and changed my mind like three times what conclusion I drew from it.
Have Shadell's votes and unvotes on Zaealix.
Initial vote

Shadell claims Zaea is a bad hit ultimately. Their vote is still on Zaealix.
It's unclear to me why Shadell agrees here.

Shadell changes his mind about whether Zaea is a bad vote, on the grounds of having no better vote.

Shadell swaps to Happerry for a bad post.

Shadell decides the swap to Happerry was bad and goes back to Zaealix My current belief (and I now feel reasonably comfortable in it) is that Shadell was town, and waffling in indecision. There's understandable reasoning behind each of the posts, and I'm having trouble imagining a world in which this is good scum play.

So here we see another focus on Zaealix. What I see as TMI here is wording. Bailout. That implies from my PoV a slip on knowing Zae was town and then focusing on Shadell's voting pattern regarding it. It feels as though your trying to set up a town read on your scummate while also trying to sus someone you know as town a bit by calling it a bailout.

#547
General impression of Yun is someone feeling highly pressured, and arguing poorly/in bad faith to try to avert it.
This impression is pretty strong right now.
I think I'm more inclined to vote elsewhere today.

The problem is I didn't get the idea that Yun didn't have confidence in their reads. When you view it from the PoV of that day I read Yun as trying to manipulate an argument to land a scumread which then brought actual pressure. You can look back and say that Yes, the statement is correct, but without the knowledge of the flip at the time this post comes off as strong TMI and distancing from another town lynch again in lieu of a stronger playre removal.


So, first off, I think -Rosen's argument for Zaealix town is hot garbage. I'd be repeating others at this point for that. I've also generally found their argumentation really unhelpful for actual factfinding, and the constant calls for townclears generally suspicious.


Other things which have gone unremarked:
If you check when -Rosen started gathering data, there was already a strong and growing wagon on Zaealix.
The data -Rosen recieved was pretty predictable from the thread. The analysis was pretty much limited to 'Zaealix can't be scum'. Together, this gives the strong impression that this data collection was done for the explicit purpose of building that specific argument. (-Rosen says there's other purposes behind the GtH. If true, I suspect they'll be just as bs as this one was.)

The push for LHF happened as a wagon was building on them, which stinks of deflection.

Finally, Zaealix's behaviour since day start reads fairly strongly like distancing. Note that -Rosen and Zaealix have a half-assed argument, where -Rosen utterly fails to engage Zaealix's points, and Zaealix fails to meaningfully press them.
This post in particular reads as poor quality, toothless distancing.

I think, right now, the most plausible world is one where -Rosen had to bail out his scumbuddy.

Here we have heavy susing on -Rosen under the assumption that Zae is their scumbuddy. Anyone note this as familiar? "X is Scum! thus Y is scum by association, lynch Y first!" I am seeing the same argument towards Meso now and seeing it twice isn't flying by.

A possible explanation for QT is town (only looking at activity) is that QT does not have time/attention for the game. This is not particularly difficult to think up.

Obviously this is not good for town, which is why policy lynches exist, but the concept of an inactive towny is hardly mystifying.

Now this is my last TMI read but I can admit it's one that can be inferred from general knowledge of these things. But when buckled with 3 others I feel like it may have been just enough TMI...especially with a later post.

Yun: Scumreading. Previous read of 'highly pressured' still holds. Latest post reads far more like an attempt to kill QT than a legitimate argument.
I need to reread in detail, but I think that will only change strength of scumread.

QT: Scumreading. D1 vote was very sheepy, My attempts to press for details got ignored. Lack of activity is a contributing factor.

Note the scumreading on QT, for the same factors of before the next day, except now they're scumreading yun instead of saying their town for the exact same reasoning that they called them town for?

YesterDay claimed Yun suspicious, with only saving grace being -Rosen pushing super hard. Day starts with the suspicion on Yun having vanished, and no pushes made. Later vote is very plausibly distancing, particularly with switching off to dink QT.
Need to reread early material.
This is functionally the second wagon of the Day. Splitting the wagon between the two people I consider scum is not going to plausibly allow a third person to win.

I find you more suspicious than Yun, so my vote is going to you instead of them.

And here we go again. Now I agreed that Meso's dropping of Yun was sus initially. After the flip I reviewed meso and realized I had been too stubborn on my read of Yun/Meso scumworld and didn't factor in that Meso tends to second guess themselves more than I like (Which means have some faith in your reads Meso your a good player) and they don't mono-focus like Me or Nictis tend to do. It actually brought me back to neutral on Meso after the flip, but you didn't let go of this despite the flip.

This post is, without context, somewhat wolfy as it's basically "I find Yun scummy but not enough to vote for today." With no context that would be a shoddy reason to vote for Meso, but when you see a post like this you expect follow up, since otherwise it reads like easy distancing.

Night events should have made Yun seem more scummy. D3 rolls around. Things read like Meso has forgotten they ever scumread Yun.
First, Meso explicitly states not having any idea who scum is. Not even an 'I'm still kind of suspicious of Yun.'
There is a complete lack of pressure, which I'll concede could be the explanation Meso gave: FIND LINK

When pressed on what they think of Yun, their answers do not line up with 'I find Yun scummy', nor with 'I found Yun scummy a Day ago but am now doubting myself'. They line up far better with trying to excuse Yun's behaviour. I'd expect either consistency with the prior scumread, or some mention of how he was now doubting it- but there's no indication the given post-facto justification actually impacted these posts.

The D3 posts don't read like sudden uncertainty impacted them at all. The post from D2 in to the D3 posts is not sufficiently explained by 'always found Yun weird.' Neither of Meso's explanations plausibly line up with past events.

The above is the bulk of my scumread, made significantly stronger by how it feels like Meso has been trying to avoid giving a straight answer. I have, I think, been pretty explicit about what I'm looking for.

The core basis of this as I'm reading it is Meso avoided voting Yun because Yun was their scummate. Pre-flip this was fine. You've stated you don't believe meso's indecisiveness to be sincere but...frankly that's just Meso. Looking back I remember in I believe clown mafia me trying to work Meso as "3rd-Wheel" scum but failing due to Meso's Indecisiveness disrupting that. (Could be a dif game I just know at the end it was me vs Meso in a big argument). You've stuck on that through D4 and into this D5.

Reads are basically unchanged, save that meso is now a weaker scumread than QT.

QT/Pawn I think is most likely scum. Mostly from dodging pushes while still QT, early posts as pawn rub me wrong.
Meso I still think is scum. My reasoning before did not rely on Yun being scum, I see the same contradiction either way. It no longer serves an obvious scum purpose though, so my scumread is no longer confident.
I haven't done due diligence on either Cyric or Pyrros.
Shadell I still think is town from early iso.

Here you even point out your own contradiction. The reasoning for scum reading isn't there, but you still scumread it...you've maintained the exact same argument but the reasoning's have fallen through.

This part of the read stands independant of Yun's scum/towniness

Except...

The read was more compelling and more damning when I thought Yun was scum, because in the case of a Meso/Yun scum team there was a clear, scummy reason for the D2 post, a clear, scummy reason for not following up on it D3, and a clear, scummy reason for when they started exhibiting suspicions again D3.
These reasons no longer hold up, making me less certain of the scumread.

Again, you say from my PoV and how I interpret it: This read is independant of Yun's Flip...but because of Yun's flip the ground for the read isn't there and isn't that good. Yet...you've been pushing it this whole time and looking for other reasons to shade Meso and re-establish the scum read.

Sorry for the wall but I feel the effort is worth it.
 
This is where you first went in poking the waters about Zaelix, trying to get an idea of what towns thought process of them at the time.



So here we see another focus on Zaealix. What I see as TMI here is wording. Bailout. That implies from my PoV a slip on knowing Zae was town and then focusing on Shadell's voting pattern regarding it. It feels as though your trying to set up a town read on your scummate while also trying to sus someone you know as town a bit by calling it a bailout.



The problem is I didn't get the idea that Yun didn't have confidence in their reads. When you view it from the PoV of that day I read Yun as trying to manipulate an argument to land a scumread which then brought actual pressure. You can look back and say that Yes, the statement is correct, but without the knowledge of the flip at the time this post comes off as strong TMI and distancing from another town lynch again in lieu of a stronger playre removal.




Here we have heavy susing on -Rosen under the assumption that Zae is their scumbuddy. Anyone note this as familiar? "X is Scum! thus Y is scum by association, lynch Y first!" I am seeing the same argument towards Meso now and seeing it twice isn't flying by.



Now this is my last TMI read but I can admit it's one that can be inferred from general knowledge of these things. But when buckled with 3 others I feel like it may have been just enough TMI...especially with a later post.



Note the scumreading on QT, for the same factors of before the next day, except now they're scumreading yun instead of saying their town for the exact same reasoning that they called them town for?




And here we go again. Now I agreed that Meso's dropping of Yun was sus initially. After the flip I reviewed meso and realized I had been too stubborn on my read of Yun/Meso scumworld and didn't factor in that Meso tends to second guess themselves more than I like (Which means have some faith in your reads Meso your a good player) and they don't mono-focus like Me or Nictis tend to do. It actually brought me back to neutral on Meso after the flip, but you didn't let go of this despite the flip.



The core basis of this as I'm reading it is Meso avoided voting Yun because Yun was their scummate. Pre-flip this was fine. You've stated you don't believe meso's indecisiveness to be sincere but...frankly that's just Meso. Looking back I remember in I believe clown mafia me trying to work Meso as "3rd-Wheel" scum but failing due to Meso's Indecisiveness disrupting that. (Could be a dif game I just know at the end it was me vs Meso in a big argument). You've stuck on that through D4 and into this D5.



Here you even point out your own contradiction. The reasoning for scum reading isn't there, but you still scumread it...you've maintained the exact same argument but the reasoning's have fallen through.



Except...



Again, you say from my PoV and how I interpret it: This read is independant of Yun's Flip...but because of Yun's flip the ground for the read isn't there and isn't that good. Yet...you've been pushing it this whole time and looking for other reasons to shade Meso and re-establish the scum read.

Sorry for the wall but I feel the effort is worth it.
I didn't play in clown mafia, it was the game I spectated that got me interested in playing. I think maybe that was Game of Crowns?
 
I didn't play in clown mafia, it was the game I spectated that got me interested in playing. I think maybe that was Game of Crowns?

No, it was Totadilez 1st game, I remember that much. I just can't remember what game that was. Either way irrelevant to which exact game it was but it happened.
 
So, first off, I wish you'd organized your post so I could tell what is in response to what, or so that there was a clearer structure of points.

This post is going to focus on the 'pattern of TMI' that you supposedly saw.
To be clear: this is me pressing on what I found suspicious about your push on me, and the pattern of TMI that I don't believe you ever saw.
Actually defending myself from these points is for a later post.


So here we see another focus on Zaealix. What I see as TMI here is wording. Bailout. That implies from my PoV a slip on knowing Zae was town and then focusing on Shadell's voting pattern regarding it. It feels as though your trying to set up a town read on your scummate while also trying to sus someone you know as town a bit by calling it a bailout.
This isn't a TMI, by any reasonable definition of the term.
You can call this shading, and there's a reasonable argument here which I'll defend against later.
Your logic here is: I used the word Bailout to imply Zae was scum, which slips that I knew he was town.
Saying "I implied Zaealix was scum, which indicates I knew he was town" is absurd. Knowing Zaealix is town doesn't even match this behaviour particularly well as a post facto justification.
I don't see how you would see this in a pattern of TMI.


The problem is I didn't get the idea that Yun didn't have confidence in their reads. When you view it from the PoV of that day I read Yun as trying to manipulate an argument to land a scumread which then brought actual pressure. You can look back and say that Yes, the statement is correct, but without the knowledge of the flip at the time this post comes off as strong TMI and distancing from another town lynch again in lieu of a stronger playre removal.
This is a TMI read, and plausible.
It's also the one where I asked if you had any others, since it's not a pattern on it's own.
I will defend against this later.

Here we have heavy susing on -Rosen under the assumption that Zae is their scumbuddy. Anyone note this as familiar? "X is Scum! thus Y is scum by association, lynch Y first!" I am seeing the same argument towards Meso now and seeing it twice isn't flying by.
This isn't a TMI read in any way at all. This isn't even dressed up as a TMI read.


Now this is my last TMI read but I can admit it's one that can be inferred from general knowledge of these things. But when buckled with 3 others I feel like it may have been just enough TMI...especially with a later post.
And this one is...
Pointing out that town can in fact be inactive is not TMI, this would be a massive stretch even if you had three other data points.
 
Back
Top