"It's like a Hutt in a swimming resort," somebody whispered as the whole team stared at the projection of the bridge. Maybe it's Shen or Madoc, you weren't sure, but you had to agree. The bridge looked terrible, not unusable like the last time, but flawed. "Something you never wanted to see, yet you can't look away."
"What is it with us and bridges or cockpits? I mean, it isn't so difficult to design something like that. We even have a simulator to help us and our university degrees! By the endless Void, I feel stupid!" That's Shen, for sure. You could clearly hear his desperate anger at the bridge and only agreed with him. But you could also feel the same tiredness that tinged his words.
>>I think we should all ask for a refund. It is workable, at least it is better than last time. But that is the only positive thing I will say about it.<<
Right, what to do with the bridge design? As much as you would like to start from the ground up, time was ticking. Redesigning the whole thing will cost time and energy that your team will lack later on. Yet, the design was terrible. A fresh start might just be what you needed. It had worked in the past, so why not now?
[ ] Start from scratch! (+2 Stress)
[ ] Just take it as it is and make improvements ...
-[ ] Add +1 Maneuverability for 1 Advantage
-[ ] Add +1 Weapons for 1 Advantage
-[ ] Lower Cost by -1 for 1 Advantage
[ ] Vulkan Corvette Bridge
Name: Mk. 1 Vulkan Corvette Bride
Size: Large (-1 Compartment, +1 Weapon)
Maneuverability: Starting at 1
Weapons: Starting at 2
Advantage: 3
Flaw: 2
Cost: Starting at 4
Must be armed with at least 4 light laser cannons and 2 heavy laser cannons
Double barrels are preferred; quads for the light once
[X] Just take it as it is and make improvements ...
-[X] Add +1 Weapons for 1 Advantage
[x] Start from scratch! (+2 Stress)
I can see were the wind blows, but after this we need to take a small break or at least bleed off the stress. I still have PTSD from the Darkest Dungeon because of stress.
Should these be the other way around? I get a different result when adding up the dice roll results.
1st Roll = 2 -> 1 Advantage, 2 Flaws
2nd Roll = 4 -> 2 Advantages, 1 Flaw
Simulator for Performance tests: -1 Flaw for own Parts in Frame, Engine, Cockpit
Should these be the other way around? I get a different result when adding up the dice roll results.
1st Roll = 2 -> 1 Advantage, 2 Flaws
2nd Roll = 4 -> 2 Advantages, 1 Flaw
Simulator for Performance tests: -1 Flaw for own Parts in Frame, Engine, Cockpit
If we end up with a worse result than this one, we keep the old one, right?
Or can we take the best from both?
Due to the system in use we're actually exactly average in F/A (1/2 and 2/1). The redesign ís equally likely to make things worse overall as it is to make it better.