*edit* pls disregard the above, not sure why this got quoted in my postIf people don't want to be immortal that's fine, I said granted access to it not forced to undergo it
We are a company not a government(yet) so stuff like that is up to them but we shouldn't make it so expensive that only the rich can afford it every one should be able to.
This is the internet you can't be sure if someone is serious or not.
Uplifting of sapient species, creation of new life, and adding new abilities to existing life are all technically illegal, ref http://masseffect.wikia.com/wiki/Gene_therapy . While age prolongation would certainly count as expanding an existing ability, immortality could be argued to be fundamentally different, much like infinity is not really a number.
.
Well... technically stopping aging is removing a capability from an existing lifeform. Getting old and making way for the next generation is a feature of fast evolving life, not a defect. I'm fairly sure we had to evolve
Senescence, and reversing the changes of that evolution isn't the same as, say, adding wings, or built in biological radios or something.
You can also word it as simply a cure for the various illnesses and frailness of age - call it a cure for "TDS" (Time Degradation Syndrome) instead of calling it eternal youth.
If they really try to hit us with that, throw enough money at Lawyers and Lobbyists and we have very reasonable grounds to argue that we're not violating any of those restrictions.
Last edited: