WELCOME TO TENKAWA CITY: Magical Burst 4.0 RPG

[Ars Poetica]

@Nathaniel Wolff, @willyvereb, you are the only players left that haven't posted yet. You have five hours remaining before I make a post for you. Remember what happened to Grue, and know that I am being serious right now.

 

[Murderhobo of Nod]

Hey, quick question: judging by MoN's comment earlier, I can investigate the place I am in now, too, since it's a different part of the orphanage than the park. Can I?

Click to shrink...

Nope.

This investigation is becoming rather questionable.

 

[ApocalypticFish]

I'm okay with that.

Click to shrink...

Seconded.

Click to shrink...

Nope.

This investigation is becoming rather questionable.

Click to shrink...

I'm getting mixed signals here...

 

[Ars Poetica]

I'm getting mixed signals here...

Click to shrink...

I'm neutral either way, Nod's thinking the investigation is questionable, and Takoe is fine with you continuing it.

Do whatever, we'll move on from there.

 

[Murderhobo of Nod]

Its more of missing the actual corpse for the bush.

Without further probing, you aren't getting much information.

 

[TurtleDucks]

Hey @Murderhobo of Nod , me and Fish finished up. We'll be putting our conversation up in the IC thread now.

 

[The Fourth Monado]

... Okay, I got something.

I'll have to save the IC PTSD for later.

Now where's the IC thread...

 

[Murderhobo of Nod]

... Okay, I got something.

I'll have to save the IC PTSD for later.

Now where's the IC thread...

Click to shrink...

Link in the OP.

 

[TurtleDucks]

So, GMs, is mine and Fish's conversation workable?

 

[ApocalypticFish]

Did a roll for investigation for my character in the most recent post.

Got a sixteen.

Edit: Also, @TurtleDucks, we should probably add each other into our relationships list; relationship value = 1 at this point, obviously.

 

[Ars Poetica]

Did a roll for investigation for my character in the most recent post.

Got a sixteen.

Click to shrink...

@Murderhobo of Nod, @ElectromagneticRhapsody that's a pass. Right?

So, GMs, is mine and Fish's conversation workable?

Click to shrink...

I'm fine with it. @Takoe, @TehChron, @Ridiculously Average Guy, @D.D. Spectator, you guys fine with this?

 

[TehChron]

Uh guess

 

[Takoe]

I'm fine with it. @Takoe, @TehChron, @Ridiculously Average Guy, @D.D. Spectator, you guys fine with this?

Click to shrink...

No qualms here.
I'd prefer things not being rehearsed, but that's just me being mildly pedantic.

 

[Murderhobo of Nod]

@Murderhobo of Nod, @ElectromagneticRhapsody that's a pass. Right?

Click to shrink...

That's a rock solid success.

 

[TurtleDucks]

I also made an investigation roll. The total is 11.

 

[Murderhobo of Nod]

I also made an investigation roll. The total is 11.

Click to shrink...

That's a fuck up.

Anyway, let me recheck the rules. There might be cooperation bonuses.

 

[Murderhobo of Nod]

Remember, folks, you want a roll above 12.

 

[InfiniteDaze]

@Nathaniel Wolff, @willyvereb, you are the only players left that haven't posted yet. You have five hours remaining before I make a post for you. Remember what happened to Grue, and know that I am being serious right now.

Click to shrink...

I can still see the gun at their heads.

 

[ApocalypticFish]

Anyway, let me recheck the rules. There might be cooperation bonuses.

Click to shrink...

There are. If without a relationship, gives a +1 bonus to their roll. If with a relationship, add the value of their relationship. Since our relationship value is 1, it gives a +1 bonus. So, add +1 to both our rolls, I guess. However, I should mention something else; only one person can help with a challenge roll (in this case, the challenge roll is for investigation).

 

[Murderhobo of Nod]

There are. If without a relationship, gives a +1 bonus to their roll. If with a relationship, add the value of their relationship. Since our relationship value is 1, it gives a +1 bonus. So, add +1 to both our rolls, I guess. However, I should mention something else; only one person can help with a challenge roll (in this case, the challenge roll is for investigation).

Click to shrink...

Was that always on your sheet?

 

[TurtleDucks]

I can still see the gun at their heads.

Click to shrink...

Nathaniel seems like their fighting for life, but /I haven't seen hide nor hair of Willy. I'm thinking we're gonna see another murder

 

[ApocalypticFish]

I can still see the gun at their heads.

Click to shrink...

By the way, @Nathaniel Wolff, I don't think you've posted yet. The clock of fate is ticking. Kind of like how the wheel of fate is turning.

 

[ApocalypticFish]

Was that always on your sheet?

Click to shrink...

No. It was just added, because we just formed a relationship of some sort. I think this is how it works? You only make a challenge roll if your success is in doubt, so I decided to just put it on. However, if you want me to take it off, then I can.

 

[Murderhobo of Nod]

No. It was just added, because we just formed a relationship of some sort. I think this is how it works? You only make a challenge roll if your success is in doubt, so I decided to just put it on. However, if you want me to take it off, then I can.

Click to shrink...

Please, inform the DMs. In any case it saves @TurtleDucks roll, however.

Edit: In fact roll charm, you and @TurtleDucks. 2d6+Charm.

 

[ApocalypticFish]

Please, inform the DMs. In any case it saves @TurtleDucks roll, however.

Click to shrink...

Thank you for the information. I thought this

Edit: Also, @TurtleDucks, we should probably add each other into our relationships list; relationship value = 1 at this point, obviously.

Click to shrink...

was good enough, but tagging one or two of the DMs isn't that tough to do.