- Location
- va
[X] Plan Spread Out And Draw A Circle
Yes it provides a bonus, though remember your relations are currently at 89, so many of the tribes that were favorably inclined to you are...still favorably inclined to you after the Köngurmöte, even moreso actually. This is an action for going after those who still aren't despite that.Do we get a bonus to Horse Lords diplomatic action from Halfdan's advice, and from the Köngurmöte performance? I mean 50/50 odds of improved relations after a bunch of Southern tribes were ready to pledge to Illona as Köngur seems a tad low. I'm inclined to strike while to iron is hot, if there is any advantage.
To the contrary, I think it is the least important one. At least with the Horse Lords we have some idea what is going on, and the have a high opinion of us (89%).Now, the single most important option within the rest of the diplomatic pool to take is without a doubt the Horse Lords one
Off the Beaten Path is a good choice, too. Next year, we can plan our actions depending on the new information. On the other hand, I want to go mining next year at the latest anyway, and doing it now would provide the income one year earlier. I am rather undecided.For stewardship, I'd like to take the only available option for the Off the Beaten Path option.
Er, dice have no memory. Just because we failed in the past doesn't mean we are more likely to fail in the future.We've been botching half of our intrigue options to some ill effects, double actions means that we mess it up twice instead of just once in a turn.
Why should we take Split Focus? Do you mean Double Down?We should take Split Focus on diplo actions since the bonus Alina grants is small.
I don't quite want to pick up on the extra action, though. We've been botching half of our intrigue options to some ill effects, double actions means that we mess it up twice instead of just once in a turn.
No, I mean Split Focus.
No, I mean Split Focus.
Two actions instead of one, at the cost of losing advisor bonus and no crit. Alina's bonus is small, ergo we aren't losing much here. If we take actions with a high chance of success, it is likely to go reasonably well for us.
Double Down is for ensuring things the success of which is critical.
Um... We used it before to raise several Legions in one turn? And the rules are there for all to see?
Doubling Down & Other Mechanics - It's one of the things I came up with to use and allow players more input. It also doubles the cost of actions taken as split.
As far as I'm aware it's something I came up with on my own for this quest. So people not being familiar with it isn't that surprising.Um... We used it before to raise several Legions in one turn? And the rules are there for all to see?
...you are not pulling my leg, are you?
The key with the steppe is that if we strike now while the iron is hot, we can actually get it out of the way entirely as a front. That option is gear towards convincing uncertain northern nomads to pledge for us instead; if we can get it to be lopsided enough in our favor, we'll have subdued the steppe and eliminated a potential front. That means we don't have to worry about threats up there and can freely devote our attentions to the south without getting stabbed in the back. We want an iron-clad relationship up there so that they aren't looking at our exposed back and deciding it's juicy while we're occupied... I do want to focus on the border princes, but only after we clear this step. Presently, Hastrijan has their hands full with the civil war, and the border princes are if not fantastically happy at least satisfied with their present state.To the contrary, I think it is the least important one. At least with the Horse Lords we have some idea what is going on, and the have a high opinion of us (89%).
On the other hand, we know next to nothing about the Border Princes, and they are right next to Hastrijan.
While I think Hastrijan has enough trouble as is, and won't likely attack, I can understand that people want to know more.
If we send spies into Hastijan, we should at least double down. This has the potential to backfire badly.
Off the Beaten Path is a good choice, too. Next year, we can plan our actions depending on the new information. On the other hand, I want to go mining next year at the latest anyway, and doing it now would provide the income one year earlier. I am rather undecided.
When we have about 50/50 odds for most of the options and our councilor provides little in the way of a buff, that's about one failure per turn with two actions. Our failures with intrigue tend to be more along the lines of pissing people off and weakening further options rather than just costing a fair amount of money. It's okay when we have better odds or more bonuses leaning things in our favor, but we're not much on that stuff for the present.How about 'no'.
This is utterly wrong on so many levels, and math is one of them. It's also the one that counts most.
I mean, it's not some intangible stuff, you can actually count chances of success given the bonuses.
1) We have better odds (50, 60, and 70 except for the assassins which are borked since last turn)When we have about 50/50 odds for most of the options and our councilor provides little in the way of a buff, that's about one failure per turn with two actions.
Good points, though I admit I was reluctant to hear them. I altered the plan to use that as the intrigue option, and doubled down on it because we don't want to botch it up with our Okhrana.1) We have better odds (50, 60, and 70 except for the assassins which are borked since last turn)
2) Wrong way to look at it. We have the same failure rate doing these things over the course of several turns, but we are actually getting more things done, even despite setbacks.
3) There is a DD mechanics in place to improve our chances with low-success options.
More actions are always better, and yes, it's a sticking point.
Plus, we don't really have incredibly much to guard on our side other than desolate deserts. It'd be one thing if we had thriving cities and the like where we could at least say that we're wanting to protect them from any chaos spilling over into our realm, but as it is we'd be protecting the rocks. I'm all for manning the border as Hastrijan pulls itself together and starts to become a threat, but for now even the downright hostile factions to us are saying that they want to get their war out of the way before they think about focusing on us.I'm nor convined that fortifying out border with Hastrijan is a good choice. As long as they have their naval supremacy, they can land troops all along our coast, and they may read putting troops close to their border as a preparation for an invasion. So we may provoke them into hostility, for little gain.