Zeitgeist Blue
Currently Made of Metal
- Location
- Manila, Philippines, GMT +8
[X] Dagger Strike
[X] Yes
[X] Yes
I've noticed you haven't voted yet.
Ah! Good to know. Will you be putting this info anywhere in the thread to be threadmarked for easy access? Perhaps one of the first page posts? Our current assets and etc. Structures perhaps. Ships/armies/military etc blah blahYou have a full squadron (9) of Dauntless class and two echelons (6) of Tower class. Capital class squadrons are made up of Echelons of three, with three Echelons forming a Squadron. To be honest, I fully expect you to churn out a rather large fleet in the next few turns
Ah! Good to know. Will you be putting this info anywhere in the thread to be threadmarked for easy access? Perhaps one of the first page posts? Our current assets and etc. Structures perhaps. Ships/armies/military etc blah blah
Another thing to note, it didn't seem from @Snowfire that the standard options including Dagger would attempt to subvert the network instead of just destroying it. One is indeed more surgical and should leave a lot left over which is what we are aiming with, but still ded. Seems we would need to write in for a dagger version of an subvert attempt. Not sure if we honestly should though, since it's honestly tough enough as it is. Honestly hoping some Miracle Vega stuff floats in somehow, but it seems she didn't hit a miracle on her side. Possibly a trance since having an easy ish time of the spoofing... though she did seem to show some strain in the last snip during the communication.
The list never ends eh?It is on the list of things I need to do at some point in the near future
Oh, I thought that's what I said. Clarifying/Confirming/Affirming it I guess.You would need a write-in to aim for a subversion from where you currently stand. It would also, as I think I've said, be extremely difficult.
I agree, but, on the other hand - do you think we are the first species that manages to disable/subvert the surveillance? If you were a shiplord, how would you design the system?Who knows what other toys the system has? Lots and lots of loot for us to safely retroengineer and search for weaknesses without their observation if we can take any part of the system intact instead of just getting barely enough to maybe blow it to bits before it warns the enemy.
I agree, but, on the other hand - do you think we are the first species that manages to disable/subvert the surveillance? If you were a shiplord, how would you design the system?
For me it seems the shiplords practice a harvesting strategy, where it seems 'now develop something new' (for us to harvest) being their modus operandi. That policy would give them the results of insights their own race didn't (couldn't) come up with. For that to happen you need your crop to bloom ...A lot of this doesn't make sense. We just don't have enough of the context. The system appears designed to prevent violations by not only the subject species, but itself, to such a degree that it won't even investigate potentials. It seems almost absurdly reluctant to launch the courier despite humanity obviously knowing of the system's existence at this point. There's a reason that I've been speculating that the Shiplords have restrictions of their own, or that this system is actually that of a third party or even some human party. It's hard to draw conclusions from that, however, because the whole policy of the Shiplords is just weird. Why allow humanity even the opportunity to rebuild into a potential threat? Why not leave open observers or supervisors in addition to a clandestine system?
48 + 40 + 15 + 10 + 5 = 118.(61 + 32 + 10 + 4 + 10 + 10 vs 48 + 40 + 15 + 10 + 5 = 127 vs 113
I have a couple of questions about our choices, if you don't mind.You get to pick Marcus's priorities other priorities in the strike.
First and foremost, is this VI the controller for the ENTIRE subnet as far as we know? I.e. once it is dead, the other subnet resources are going to go idle?
Second, narrowing our scope somewhat, what happens to the defensive hub's weapons (internal and external) if we leave them alone vs take control of them? The way I'm reading your comment, we will have to keep fighting those systems if we don't take control of them, albeit it should be easier without a controller adding their bonuses to the rolls. Conversely, if we do take control, we can maybe get some data on the system. Is that accurate?
Third, what are "Subnet Platforms"? I get that the defensive node is gravitic weaponry and whatever point defence we got hit by on the way in, and that the combat platforms are the things trying to kill our boarding team at the moment, but what are the subnet platforms?
Last but not least, how easy does Marcus expect finding the other subnet assets insystem would be if we don't take data on them now? Previously, we had backtraced them but were stopped by security (or more precisely, not wanting to trip security) - does that mean we could easily achieve this with an action now, or conversely that it will be impossible since the transmissions we piggybacked on ought to stop? Also, are said assets likely to have any data (which we use if we capture it, and the Shiplords use if we don't), or was that all localized to the VI?
EDIT: Is the locked Courier die included in our 3 choices, or do we get 3 choices PLUS the courier?