- Location
- Canada
I'm firmly in the camp that the meta-knowledge SI that is dropped in a ideal situation to share knowledge that can then be verified and acted upon better but then doesn't is a asshole and sharing is not immersion breaking simply because its a survival mechanism and people would be more worried about not being drowned or bonesawed etc.
Unless he ties himself in (stupid) knots about predestination or the Simurgh, in which case he might as well leave the city and forget about the 'plot' therefore nuking the real reason this bull is a issue, namely the writer being a hack that wants to use meta but doesn't want it to change events unpredictably (which it would anyway btw) because he then would have to actually work.
Well, you'll be happy to know I am planning to set fire to the Stations of The Canon, shoot the resulting flaming wreckage out of a mass driver, and plunge it into the sun.
The metaknowledge of how people act is much more important here than the knowledge of what will happen at a given time, with few exceptions.
And the SI will be worried about the Simurgh, and with pre-cogs as a whole. That's called 'not being idiotic'. Reliable knowledge from the future can become an instant global victory condition if used right, though the fact that in Worm precognition is really just outrageously effective (on the level of Artilect) predictive software is helpful.
With that, the Tinker power, and the meta-knowledge, I've been brainstorming ways for the SI to avoid it.
I've thought of four. One will protect from the Simurgh and PtV, but not necessarily all other precognition, one will definitely protect from the Simurgh, and it should protect from all other precognition as well, but I'm not sure about PtV, one if it works will protect from every single type of precognition including PtV and the Simurgh, and the last would definitely protect from PtV, probably the Simurgh, and likely many other types of precognition.