thanks for letting us know, good luck on all your exams real life does come first of course ^^
Writing fanfiction is supposed to be fun. Part of that means that when other things get in the way and stop it from being fun, putting it down to concentrate on those things. Don't feel you have to write for us, we all enjoy it more because we know that you don't have to do it.I think the reasonable thing to do is to take a hiatus until after my exam work is done. Hopefully that will be mid-May, but if I need to put off or retake the exam it's possible things could extend longer.
It's really hard to tell in terms of chapters, but structurally we're headed for the climax soon. Then there will be the denouement. I'd guess we're something like 75% done, but stories have a way of ballooning in wordcount sometimes.How much longer do you expect the story to be?
I don't mean how long until you finish writing, I mean how many more chapter are you expecting To need?
I'm comfortable waiting as long as is needed, so long as if you ever abandon/ finish this you post your story notes
And of course people into certain kinds of futurism and/or SF (and probably some fantasy for that matter) have been playing with the questions and answers for years.
On that note, if anyone would like to discuss/ask me about anything having to do with writing technique (story planning, character arcs, technical stuff like grammar, whatever you fancy) I'd be happy to answer questions during our intermission. I'm no expert, but I spend a lot of time studying and thinking about that stuff and enjoy discussing it.
Where do you suggest a newbie writer look to learn about writing technique?
What pseudonym did you write under?
I'll do you one better and toss a couple recommendations from the lot. Both first contact stories, for some reason. This is my most successful piece. This is a short funny one. ("Take your upvote and then go home and think about what you've done." is still one of my favorite comments ever.)
I have always wondered how an author decides where to draw the line between reading up on the theory to make the science realistic and just deciding that the science is handwaveium mixed with some proper-sounding grammar.
Thank you so much for taking the time to say that, it really brightens my day.I love reading stories that include advanced science/pseudoscience, and I have always wondered how an author decides where to draw the line between reading up on the theory to make the science realistic and just deciding that the science is handwaveium mixed with some proper-sounding grammar.
For example, when the Civilization's scientists were explaining how they would penetrate past their universe into another, I very specifically remember that you used the word 'brane,' which sent me to a dictionary and then on a 30 minute interlude of reading articles on string theory. Personally, it made the scene real to me; I could vividly imagine how much effort these fictional physicists must have put in to try to save their civilization. It's one of the (many, many) reasons that I consider "Scientia Weaponizes the Future" to be one of my favorite pieces of literature. Even months later I remember the chapter and regularly go back to re-read it because of how much it has fascinated me. So what brought on that decision to take -what I assume to be- extra effort to make the science of Scientia theoretically realistic?
I think the two biggest hand waves that have to happen in almost all sci-fi is material science and energy density/transferWith the right treatment and effort it's possible to make handwaves feel like they aren't, and that's worth the extra effort to keep the reader feeling immersed. It's an illusion, but a compelling one, and that's good storytelling.
Absolutely. Although I suspect most writers just come up with a cool idea and don't do the math.I think the two biggest hand waves that have to happen in almost all sci-fi is material science and energy density/transfer
the biggest example anybody should know right now is the MCU the Iron-Man armour which utilises an Arc Reactor which generates 8 Gigajoules (it been a while since I watched the movies but that what's on the wiki) of energy per second which ignoring if something that small could generate that much, would run into issues with the materials it's made of to contain the heat,
ensure structural stability, which would be harder as he puts it unguarded on the exterior of the suit and it doesn't go boom when damaged?!
and than the crux of the issue power transfer, I don't see how he would be able to transfer that amount of power around his suit with anything less than a cable they use for power lines (I took a course a while ago to be an electrician and vaguely remember that this is more power than can be transferred through one)
even assuming perfect throughput with no resistance in the lines it's just not possible to move that amount of power around stuff that small, as you run into the issue our current computers run into, and that's the electrons themselves
I remember something about muons (basically heavy electrons) being produced and that's how his repulsors work but I don't know if the repulsors themselves make it or it's how he bypasses the power limits
I'm pretty sure some if not most of this is wrong but it's still shows my point
Most sci-fi can be broken down into either hand waving the materials, the energy, or blaming quantum mechanics by shoving "quantum" or "dimensional" or some other in front of the title
Exactly, some use optronics to solve the electron computer issue, or dimensional/space tech to fold space and bypass the issue. "Dump the waste into hyperspace" nicely sums it up. Dump all the extra energy sideways of the local 3D slice and do whatever you want with it later, and use molecular circuitry so cableing isnt a problem, especially as the builds become larger and the detail more precise. Combined with better material science and actual quantum mechanics you can get away with pretty much anything and leave it still making (some) sense.Absolutely. Although I suspect most writers just come up with a cool idea and don't do the math.
The Origin Civilization figuring out how to make matter with custom properties in particle accelerators (not to mention metamaterial tricks) was a big help for that sort of thing. Feel free to steal the idea if you ever need to for a story. There's some leeway in real physics for it with regards to whatever the heck is going on with dark matter. There's new physics out there that we don't understand yet.
In Scientia's case, they could use custom designed room temperature superconductors (electrical and thermal) to resolve it, I think.Exactly, some use optronics to solve the electron computer issue, or dimensional/space tech to fold space and bypass the issue. "Dump the waste into hyperspace" nicely sums it up. Dump all the extra energy sideways of the local 3D slice and do whatever you want with it later, and use molecular circuitry so cableing isnt a problem, especially as the builds become larger and the detail more precise. Combined with better material science and actual quantum mechanics you can get away with pretty much anything and leave it still making (some) sense.