Problem comes the general trend.Well, you can take the "bleedingheart stupid" argument up with Caesar, as leaving the temple in place was his plan. The same guy who voted 'let's just kill or enslave everyone' in the previous round of votes.
That said, in his defense... A decision that is made in the total absence of information which would otherwise change the decision, is not a stupid decision because of the lack of the information, unless there was a reasonable opportunity to gain the information that was willfully or deliberately missed.
Suppose someone offers you a choice of unlocking one of two boxes, one of which contains a billion dollars and one of which contains nothing. They won't tell you which one. You choose the box on the left and open it. It contains nothing. The person taunts you, going "Aha, you must feel stupid now!"
It would be reasonable to reply "No, no I do not feel stupid. I regret the outcome of my decision, but I don't regret the process that gave rise to it. I didn't know the fortune was in the box on the right, and you wouldn't have told me, so there was no reasonable way for me to somehow know and be 'smart' by choosing the 'right' answer. It was just a question of a lucky guess, versus an unlucky guess."
Obviously.We already showed carrot and got shit for it. It is time for the stick.
Problem comes the general trend.
Everytime there is 2 boxes where one has puppy and other has something valuable that we don't know what it is. We always go for the puppy. So yes it is stupid. We knew that tample was a rallying point. Doesn't matter its particulars.
Also it is Vae Victis [] or bust.
We already showed carrot and got shit for it. It is time for the stick.
We also have to consider that the vet's opinion is biased and does not necessarily reflect reality.
Leaving aside the fact we're wasting salt that could go pay our soldiers on the topic of the temple,, I think this option is being overlooked. This guy is the closest thing they have to a leader. If the Sammites are really as bloodthirsty and fanatically religious as they're being made out to be? The town will be a bloodbath between this dude+bodyguards and the militia within moments. Easy pickings. If they don't believe us, then either this guy's a slick operator or the common farmer's really that stubborn. Or, they're not actually that fanatical.[] Reject Spurio's offer and send a messenger to the town informing them of his attempted betrayal.
Leaving aside the fact we're wasting salt that could go pay our soldiers on the topic of the temple,, I think this option is being overlooked. This guy is the closest thing they have to a leader. If the Sammites are really as bloodthirsty and fanatically religious as they're being made out to be? The town will be a bloodbath between this dude+bodyguards and the militia within moments. Easy pickings. If they don't believe us, then either this guy's a slick operator or the common farmer's really that stubborn. Or, they're not actually that fanatical.
If being honorable to a bunch of foreigners is only going to result in them dissing us for it, what sense does it make to be honorable? We're under no obligation by any stretch of the imagination.I am thinking about it, but it does have the disadvantage of discouraging people from betraying their cities to us in the future. Also, it's the sort of thing Cato might do, and the thought of behaving like Cato makes me want to vomit.
If being honorable to a bunch of foreigners is only going to result in them dissing us for it, what sense does it make to be honorable? We're under no obligation by any stretch of the imagination.
Well...But do they outweigh the time, energy and Roman blood we'll have to expend in the future assaulting/besieging cities that would otherwise have fallen by treachery?
Depends on whether or not I'm right.If the Sammites are really as bloodthirsty and fanatically religious as they're being made out to be? The town will be a bloodbath between this dude+bodyguards and the militia within moments. Easy pickings.
Regret to not call peace yet?Well, you can take the "bleedingheart stupid" argument up with Caesar, as leaving the temple in place was his plan. The same guy who voted 'let's just kill or enslave everyone' in the previous round of votes.
That said, in his defense... A decision that is made in the total absence of information which would otherwise change the decision, is not a stupid decision because of the lack of the information, unless there was a reasonable opportunity to gain the information that was willfully or deliberately missed.
Suppose someone offers you a choice of unlocking one of two boxes, one of which contains a billion dollars and one of which contains nothing. They won't tell you which one. You choose the box on the left and open it. It contains nothing. The person taunts you, going "Aha, you must feel stupid now!"
It would be reasonable to reply "No, no I do not feel stupid. I regret the outcome of my decision, but I don't regret the process that gave rise to it. I didn't know the fortune was in the box on the right, and you wouldn't have told me, so there was no reasonable way for me to somehow know and be 'smart' by choosing the 'right' answer. It was just a question of a lucky guess, versus an unlucky guess."
I am not even surprised a this point. SV might talk big game about being competent but if they have to choose they always go with bledingheart stupid.
How much money is ten talents, relatively speaking? We're spending it on fifty guys, how much is that per guy?
Also, do we know how much the loot from the other town is?
Whatever we do, I definitely don't want to try and get these guys to fight for us. Even if this is an honest offer, they're making this offer because they're scared. These are not people to rely on in a fight.
Jesus christ. We've got to haggle this guy down, I'm not paying a full sixth of our loot, taking money from our soldiers, for the assistance of fifty half starved farmers.