It's basically been an integral part of our campaign strategy from the start. Just take a look at our People over Politics plank or the fact that one of our strengths originally was that we're an outsider. What more do you want from an anti-establishment candidate?Could have Pataki legitimately go for the Drain The Swamp track....his record holds up to anticorruption?
That stand is going to rally the gun nuts all the harder. That's a Democrat argument.First idea that's popped into my head is the classic standby of mental health treatment. Cite that it's not just these lunatic school shooters, but that the rate of suicide by gun is nearly twice that of homocide. Suicide is a tragedy, and anybody who argues against it is a heartless bastard who doesn't care about the lives of Americans. But Pataki cares. Pataki will defend life.
One of the few things we can do that's worse than being weak on abortion and gun control is to say those issues aren't important.
I like this. It would be worth pulling up stats to see if gun club regulars are more or less likely to commit crimes, or at least gun crimes.Everyone I know who is passionate about guns is also passionate about their gun club/shooting range and the culture of responsibility it fosters. Maybe QuestPataki can square his unpopular gun control ideas by selling himself as being pro-responsible gun clubs?
Problem is there are no stats. The NRA has done an amazing job at ensuring no one can research gun violence. An example of this is that the ATF is legally forbidden from using an electronic database for firearms data so all of that has to be stored on paper or microfilm which then has to be manually searched through to track down who a gun belongs to.I like this. It would be worth pulling up stats to see if gun club regulars are more or less likely to commit crimes, or at least gun crimes.
...Problem is there are no stats. The NRA has done an amazing job at ensuring no one can research gun violence. An example of this is that the ATF is legally forbidden from using an electronic database for firearms data so all of that has to be stored on paper or microfilm which then has to be manually searched through to track down who a gun belongs to.
Since when is the lack of hard evidence a problem for politics?Problem is there are no stats. The NRA has done an amazing job at ensuring no one can research gun violence. An example of this is that the ATF is legally forbidden from using an electronic database for firearms data so all of that has to be stored on paper or microfilm which then has to be manually searched through to track down who a gun belongs to.
I wonder if we can use this as an example of a invalid means to protect the right to bare arms, and something that is detrimental to both gun owners, and law abiding citizens, to only benefit criminals?Problem is there are no stats. The NRA has done an amazing job at ensuring no one can research gun violence. An example of this is that the ATF is legally forbidden from using an electronic database for firearms data so all of that has to be stored on paper or microfilm which then has to be manually searched through to track down who a gun belongs to.
I wonder if we can use this as an example of a invalid means to protect the right to bare arms, and something that is detrimental to both gun owners, and law abiding citizens, to only benefit criminals?
No, that wouldn't work, the right of a person to be able to sell their own property without government approval and such. I was thinking pointing out that such a regulation is making the government inefficient deliberately in order to make it so that it is impossible to protect the citizenry from crime.Well if you do maybe we can make the argument that open gun sales in gun expos leaves them open for a domestic terrorist working for al-quida to purchase one.
And perhaps add something along the lines of requiring a warrant to access those records. Emphasize that they will still be protected by the Constitution, and that only criminals and terrorists should have anything to fear.No, that wouldn't work, the right of a person to be able to sell their own property without government approval and such. I was thinking pointing out that such a regulation is making the government inefficient deliberately in order to make it so that it is impossible to protect the citizenry from crime.
I still want to know,Why Trump seem to have everything hand to him? Divine intervention?.
The analalysis talk about Trump need to do passable,I just want to know the "Why" reason.
Trump was a frontrunner who has no heavy pressure from any direction. He's leading the pack, all he needs to do is not fuck up, and he'll be fineI still want to know,Why Trump seem to have everything hand to him? Divine intervention?.
The analalysis talk about Trump need to do passable,I just want to know the "Why" reason.
If this is fictional setting,We will scream author fiat and Mary sue by now.Look at real life -- for whatever reason, a whole bunch of people supported him for basically being himself.
If this is fictional setting,We will scream author fiat and Mary sue by now.
If this is fictional setting,We will scream author fiat and Mary sue by now.
You forgot John GlennAnd the saddest death of the year wasn't David Bowie, Prince, or Alan Rickman,
Trump was a frontrunner who has no heavy pressure from any direction. He's leading the pack, all he needs to do is not fuck up, and he'll be fine
Trump has +2 on his charisma with celebrity trait in characther creation,he some how munchkin his way to take"KKK endorsement","White supremacism" as negative trait to pick more perk like "High energy".IRL?
But if you have no rep in the game than how do people recognize you other than "that celebrity".
He does have a rep. He's currently polling in the lead nationally, and in most states. Trump is winning right now, and he largely controls the narrative. That's being challenged by Pataki and Christie, but don't underestimate him.IRL?
But if you have no rep in the game than how do people recognize you other than "that celebrity".