Private Lee O'Malley
Easygoing Egoist
- Location
- Gensokyo
I mean, Tarkus is less pretty than Bruford, so obviously he's more evil.
That's how that works, right?
Basically.
I mean, Tarkus is less pretty than Bruford, so obviously he's more evil.
That's how that works, right?
Yeah there are exceptions to that rule, e.g: Narcian who is only second to Oliver in terms of beauty is fucking evil and Gonzalez, while not very handsome, is still a good guy.Real talk though, the level of blatant plagiarism on display in that comic is the only thing more insulting than the art, and both are equally emblematic of Rob Liefeld despite the comic not being made by him. The man inspired a very special blend of laziness and hackiness that you just don't see nowadays (insert RWBY joke here, laugh, then please move on because one mod intervention sparked by an off-topic dead horse is too many already).
Again though: By that logic, this is going to end with Dio turning out to be the good guy all along. Though yes, Fire Emblem is distressingly blatant in indulging in "Good = Beauty," though there are at least several more rugged characters like, in the very game referred in this comic book, Dorcas, a bandit you recruit who is handsome, but in a very masculine, scarred way rather than the typical bishounen.
Well, I mean, not all the heroes are beautiful....
Oh who am I kidding, Speedwagon and Zeppeli are gorgeous men and Jonathan is a big dumb bear.
Well, I mean, not all the heroes are beautiful....
Oh who am I kidding, Speedwagon and Zeppeli are gorgeous men and Jonathan is a big dumb bear.
There are few JoJo protagonist casts that don't look like supermodels in general.
There are few JoJo protagonist casts that don't look like supermodels in general.
But Dio is attractive in a more effeminate way than the hyper-masculine protagonists, which in shounen usually means he's the rival and/or archnemesis. The Aztec-brain-spike mask is filling in for Char's mask from Gundam.Again though: By that logic, this is going to end with Dio turning out to be the good guy all along.
I'm pretty sure it is.
Is it spoilers to argue that point? Because I've got some arguments about why certain parts are incredibly charming but ridiculous as beautiful protagonists.
That feels sort of discontinuous. A second ago, Blueford was extolling JoJo as a worthy foe who it was an honor to fight, and referring to their battle as a fight between heroes. Now he's being derogatory? Weird. Dunno if this is an Araki problem, or a translation problem. I suspect the latter, but I'm not sure.
Going by the visuals here, Tarkus is somewhere in the neighborhood of 12 feet tall, which isn't remotely human. He's well into the "fantasy giant" range.
You see, I wasn't the only one who noticed that Blueford didn't appear to feel any pain (or even notice at all) when his arm got vaporized. But now, after having his whole body suffused with JoJo's low-intensity sendo barrage, he's actually feeling pain.
So, like I said. I admire JoJo's dedication to his ideals, but I don't think he actually did the right thing here. The stakes were just too high for him to risk it all on an optimistic hunch with only a little evidence in its support.
Or maybe I'm just too cynical.
For me, the most entertaining part of the the episode was the luck/pluck bit, because it only makes sense in english, and this is an 80s manga.
Araki: AW SHIT, DID YA'LL KNOW "FORTUNE" SOUNDS LIKE "COURAGE" IN ENGLISH? THIS IS GODDAMN BANANAS
Again though: By that logic, this is going to end with Dio turning out to be the good guy all along. Though yes, Fire Emblem is distressingly blatant in indulging in "Good = Beauty," though there are at least several more rugged characters like, in the very game referred in this comic book, Dorcas, a bandit you recruit who is handsome, but in a very masculine, scarred way rather than the typical bishounen.
Throughout the entirety of Jojo part 1 to 3, there are only a handful of villains I can think of who are actually ugly looking. Part 2 in particular is full of GLORIOUS ABS.
Well, the zombie mooks tend to look like the shambling corpses they are.
(In the manga: the anime's usage of crazy colors and whatnot is a clear break from the manga in this regard, and probably for the best)
I think that's less cynicism and making some questionable assumptions about the likely consequences of being wrong. They had their literal life-and-death struggle between a superhuman monster and a solar-powered boy go on for several minutes, with the initial chunk having little effect on each party. In a strictly real-world universe sure your general chain of thought is a good point, but while JoJo's has more realism to it than you might intuitively expect from the name and all it's still fundamentally a story operating on its own terms. Based on what we've seen so far, Johnathan being wrong was a risk, but more like 'why did you let the boss do 20 HP damage out of your 200 HP when you could've finished them off on your turn' and not 'he stabs you through the heart and you die'.
Like yes Johnathan is holding to his ideals and there is some potential unfortunate consequences here, and JoJo's has already shown it's willing to eg have his father die as a fairly direct consequence of idealistic behavior, but I think you're putting the scene into a framework that doesn't reflect the clear dynamics of the story itself.
I mean, if JoJo's neck actually IS swordproof then you're right, and my jokes to that effect are rendered completely unironic. But is that really the case?
Jonathan has Standard Shounen Protagonist Quantum Durability. Things that should kill an ordinary man don't, unless it's blatantly obviously kind of thing no one would be able to survive without explicit supernatural fuckery, like getting your head chopped off or getting ripped in half, then suddenly they revert to the durability of a normal human and promptly expire.
Are you sure about that? I've been making jokes about JoJo's apparent indestructibility, but the show SEEMS to have been suggesting throughout this fight that if Bruford really did get to bring his sword down on JoJo's neck, it would kill him. And that's what JoJo was letting Bruford do in the hopes that he'd get ahold of himself at the last second.
I mean, if JoJo's neck actually IS swordproof then you're right, and my jokes to that effect are rendered completely unironic. But is that really the case?
Jonathan has Shounen Protagonist quantum durability. Things that should kill an ordinary man don't, unless it's blatantly obviously kind of thing no one would be able to survive without explicit supernatural fuckery, like getting your head chopped off or getting ripped in half, then suddenly they revert to the durability of a normal human and expire.
But Jonathan himself doesn't know that, so that isn't a valid argument for him in-universe deciding to stand down and let things play out. You're essentially arguing that he's the Shounen Action Manga equivalent of Deadpool and is fully aware of his invincibility due to narrative demands.
But that's an entirely metatextual argument. Anime protagonists never die of seemingly-fatal wounds, so JoJo won't, either. But JoJo doesn't know that he's an anime protagonist, and has no reason to believe that Bruford's sword strike won't kill him.If I'm entirely and completely honest based on my larger experience with JoJo's, yes I believe Johnathan taking a sword to the back of the neck would fail to chop right through the spinal column and instead be a Serious Injury that would seriously impair Johnathan, require Hamon help from Zeppeli after the fight to fix, and just generally be a pain in the neck, but not actually kill him.
And to be fair, chopping through a spine for a clean kill is actually really hard, so that wouldn't even actually be as unrealistic as you might think.
(Unless it was being depicted as an attempt to slash the throat? That's not how I remember it or how you described it, though)
But that's an entirely metatextual argument. Anime protagonists never die of seemingly-fatal wounds, so JoJo won't, either. But JoJo doesn't know that he's an anime protagonist, and has no reason to believe that Bruford's sword strike won't kill him.
The carotid artery, jugular and/or windpipe are on the way to the spine from every angle except from behind, so even if he fails to penetrate the vertebrae at all, the odds of survival are slim.
...I'm sorry, are you seriously saying that your argument is that JoJo fully believes that he's immune to death by decapitation????
Okay seriously on what basis are you assuming Johnathan actually believes he would die if hit? Because to the best of my recollection there is absolutely nothing suggesting he believes that, and there is no reason to assume he believes that. In fact, his habit of face-tanking so far rather implies Johnathan functionally does 'know' that he's an anime protagonist, inasmuch as his behavior is in alignment with the story he exists in.
The only metatextual part is the part where I'm saying 'yes I think JoJo's actually works this way, based on what else I've read of it'.
You are the one who is making an argument that's not based in the show-so-far, but instead is based on this weird idea that Johnathan's expectations of his own durability are magically lesser than what he has already personally experienced repeatedly.
Hmm... it seems that I did miss you implying that strike would be coming from behind. It's been a few weeks since I watched the episode in question, so I don't recall what angle the sword was coming from, but "from behind" seems the least likely one. I would expect a shounen protagonist like JoJo to be looking at the guy who's about to kill him.So... you didn't notice the part where I indicated I was under the impression the strike was to the back of the neck?
Then why did you bring it up in support of your "JoJo would live through it anyway" argument in the first place?My primary point in saying 'surprisingly difficult to cut through a human neck' isn't 'surviving a sword chop to the back of the neck and continuing to fight is perfectly realistic!'
Eh, Diesel could have been worse with its plagiarism, after all it didn't rip character designs straight from the source like Incarnate did*.Real talk though, the level of blatant plagiarism on display in that comic is the only thing more insulting than the art, and both are equally emblematic of Rob Liefeld despite the comic not being made by him. The man inspired a very special blend of laziness and hackiness that you just don't see nowadays (insert RWBY joke here, laugh, then please move on because one mod intervention sparked by an off-topic dead horse is too many already).
Assassin's Creed traditionally does this for named antagonists, since the very first game, and it isn't even a Japanese property. Ubisoft... *checks* Montreal developed just about the entire mainline series except Rogue, Syndicate, and the new one.You mean 'then suddenly they get to monologue for five minutes and go gently into a peaceful death'.
People all over routinely poke fun at how long it takes people to die in anime, manga, JRPGs, etc. Sometimes it'll take fifteen full minutes of dialogue for someone who has taken a rapidly lethal injury to actually, you know, expire, such that it ends up feeling like they're faking to milk the drama!
Eh, Diesel could have been worse with its plagiarism, after all it didn't rip character designs straight from the source like Incarnate did*.
*a comic that was super plagerism on Bleach, made by Gene Simmons' son.