Apotheosis
Lucifer
- Pronouns
- She/Her
You mean Marcipoor here?
Also, is Claudo the sarcastic one we're supposed to like or the other? Though I assume there's few differentiating features between the two.
Also, is Claudo the sarcastic one we're supposed to like or the other? Though I assume there's few differentiating features between the two.
It's Beale, of course it's self-published.
"Rest assured, I shall deal with you anon, and you shall have the opportunity to explain yourself in full, whether you will or no."
Most. Pushover. Supposedly-obnoxiously-arrogant-elven-king. EVER!
They saw his flashing eyes and stiffly erect back, which betrayed his despairing anger.
"...Our desire for talent must never be used to overshadow an absence of calling. That way lie madness and material empire."
Likeness of creatures to God is not affirmed on account of agreement in form according to formality of the same genus or species, but solely according to analog, inasmuch as God is essential being, whereas other things are beings by participation.
1537 actually
But it was clearly one of the leetest encyclicals.
Gib back rightful Milanese clay!
Also, an actual quote from it, for the Specials.
Likeness of creatures to God is not affirmed on account of agreement in form according to formality of the same genus or species, but solely according to analog, inasmuch as God is essential being, whereas other things are beings by participation.
That is literal ripped off the Summa Theologica. Which underscore two points: 1) English is ugly and clunky language, not fit for philosophy or poetry. But let us not belabour the obvious. 2) all the Beale's "brilliance" is just lazy theft. And I am sure the quote is not attributed.
If it is a text about whether elves have souls, it isn't much of a summa, is it? I mean a summa is supposed to be everything known about a topic. The Summa Theologica is supposed to be the sum of knowledge available about theology at the time. Where as this is a treatise on a specific topic about the theological status of elves.He vaguely states in the author's note that he used bits of the Summa Theologica in Summa Elvitca, though he implies more work than he put into it. And he definitely doesn't credit the translation he used.
So no real surprise--again, Pope Nero Dumbledore's declaration is Sublimis Deus with elves written in, even though this makes no sense for the world he's written. Oh, and later in Throne of Bones he rips off one Cicero's letters, with some adjustments.
Cause it's just words.
I'd say that English does just fine on poetry, and about average on philosophy.
If it is a text about whether elves have souls, it isn't much of a summa, is it? I mean a summa is supposed to be everything known about a topic. The Summa Theologica is supposed to be the sum of knowledge available about theology at the time. Where as this is a treatise on a specific topic about the theological status of elves.
I'd expect a summa on elves to include their physiognomy, and culture, and history, and a history of all the opinions regarding them from past scholars. Not just "these are the elves I met on my summer vacation".
That's a lot of dumb little mistakes for a guy who devotes at least 50% of his online written output to harping on how much of a genius he is.
The Author's Note. Beale explains that this was supposed to be the start of an epic philosophical trilogy--because of course it was. He talks about how irreligious fantasy authors just don't get how awesome the great scholars of the church were, and how he thought it was time for someone to write a fantasy novel that showed a medieval church in a medievalesque fantasy world. If so it's still time, because the Amorran Church of Crystal Dragon Jesus ain't that. He includes as many slams on atheists and modern intellectuals as he can fit in. He explains that the subtitle is a pun. He in essence, invites us to enjoy his immense cleverness.
For the later work by his patrons and promoted authors, I can say the apple fell about a micrometer from the tree. What I've seen is genre fiction (and often bad genre fiction) mixed with pretentious and arrogant ramblings about how bold, daring, creative, and above all, important it is for being bad genre fiction.
Pulp/Camp fantasy/scif is immensely fun, but it still takes talent and/or effort to make it work. Beale has no talent and puts in no effort.I have a soft spot for bad fantasy, and by "bad" I mean strains of fantasy that are out of style these days - cheesy sword-and-sandal epics, traditional heroic tales, that sort of thing.
But this is just bad, period. It employs one of my most hated tropes in fantasy - taking real world places and nations, mashing them together, changing the names a bit (or sometimes not at all), then calling it a day. We don't even get much of Beale's loathsome politics to riff on.