Something's occurred to me: Cait Sith can use materia. Which means that either robots can use materia, or people can use material
remotely.
...Hm. Well, we know that machines can interact with mako, because, well, mako reactors, for one. So the former's possible. That also seems like it'd make things like large, automated materia arrays possible, though, technology that seems like it'd have a lot of potential uses. And machines could level up materia, too.
On the other hand, if (current, at least) drones
don't have the control to use materia themselves, then there's some sort of long-distance connection being established directly between the materia Cait Sith is "using" and Cait Sith's controller -- and what else could that sort of connection be used for?
ZerbanDaGreat said:
the same way that if there was a character named Geoff you'd be a dipshit for insisting it was pronounced 'jee-off'
...That's not how it's pronounced? Huh. What
is it, then?
Noxlux013 said:
Oh, hm. Interesting question. Hard to answer at this point, I think, since saying too much about the machine's controller would be spoilery (though, as it happens, I also don't actually
remember enough about the machine's controller to answer it at the moment, anyway).
...Now I'm also wondering what the control system is. Like, is the operator sitting in an office chair in front of a couple of monitors, wearing a headphones+microphone headset and using something like a game controller? VR headset with some degree of motion capture? Direct brain-computer interface of some sort?
Guile said:
At the most basic level... yeah, probably.
A fursona doesn't need to be a sexual thing. It's just a vehicle to express yourself. Kind of goes against the spirit of the thing to use your fursona to commit corporate espionage instead of, say, hang out with Red XIII, but I'd probably invoke the Air Bud rule on that one.
Ain't nobody said a mech pilot can't use their fursona to betray their frenemies.
Eh, I don't think the presence or absence of a sexual aspect is important to the determination? As you say, it can be either.
I'd say it's a lot more important that, at the moment, we don't know what level of personal investment there is in the design. The operator developing Cait Sith's form themself is a different situation than them being handed it but liking it is a different situation than being handed it and considering it purely a tool the form of which matters only for functional purposes.
21stCentury said:
it's a persona with animal features.
Textbook definition of fursona.
Hm. Yeah, yeah, I guess there can be a grey area there. I was at first going to mention sport mascot costumes and the like as a counterexample, but then it occurred to me that the mascot of a sports team might not be the fursona of the person wearing the costume but
could be potentially considered one for the team itself. (At least, I assume; I'm not very into sports.)
So I guess it's also possible that Cait Sith, even in a situation where it's not a fursona of the operator, could be the fursona of someone or something
else, if we define it that way.